CIA Admits Spying on Senate Staffers

2001400ex said:

Did anyone realize this is from 2014? I am glad that pawz and Derek stand with Diane Feinstein. It's a good look.

Was it the 2014 in the link itself that gave it away for you? Speed limit IQ...

Hey look...HondoFS still hasn’t paid up. BIG surprise...wonder if it’s because the patties aren’t flipping themselves or the partner(?) won’t let him spend the $$$.

Can I sponsor your donation to HH for the year? Would be worth it as long as I get to add a disclaimer of my choosing to every one of your poasts...

ThomasFremont said:

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

This is pretty fucked up. Spying on domestic soil is the NSA’s job!!!

Are any of you really naive enough to think this is an isolated incident though? Our privacy rights are gone and owning millions of guns didn’t stop them from doing it.

Wtf does owning guns have to do with this?

The 2A crowd insists that guns safeguard our rights. The fact that we have plenty of guns and no privacy rights from our own government spy agencies says otherwise.

There you go again Tommy, reaching like a fucking Hondo.

Ok, so you’re content with the current state of privacy rights in today’s America?

No.

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

This is pretty fucked up. Spying on domestic soil is the NSA’s job!!!

Are any of you really naive enough to think this is an isolated incident though? Our privacy rights are gone and owning millions of guns didn’t stop them from doing it.

Wtf does owning guns have to do with this?

The 2A crowd insists that guns safeguard our rights. The fact that we have plenty of guns and no privacy rights from our own government spy agencies says otherwise.

There you go again Tommy, reaching like a fucking Hondo.

Ok, so you’re content with the current state of privacy rights in today’s America?

No.

I didn’t think so.

USMChawk said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.

You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.

And every time Trump does something crazy it's a direct reflection on Hillary because only could someone as shitty as her lead to a reality TV guy being the president.

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

pawz said:

RaceBannon said:

Hondo's embittered love affair with Hillary is the best part of this bored

No.

But it does make me think the Soros machine needs to pay @DerekJohnson for his spam.

I offered to pay @2001400ex membership for him as long as I got to add a signature of my choosing to each of his poasts.

He so far has ignored my offer...

@DerekJohnson and @Swaye . Is it possible for me to add a signature to all of @2001400ex poasts? I don't think its right for @DerekJohnson to be footing the bill for all the spam he poasts without paying his own way, and apparently he either can't afford to do it or his partner won't allow him so I've offered to sponsor him as long as I get to add a disclaimer/signature to all of his poasts.

Any way to do that?

pawz said:

@HoustonHusky I'll foot half the bill with you, but I want #aclockworkshill #doorassout. No warning.

Silencing people with opposing views is for the weak.

2001400ex said:

USMChawk said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.

You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.

No you aren't comparing shit. When Trump does something stupid. Your news source researches the shit out of it to find something Obama did that was maybe similar. To justify Trump's actions. Remember all the shit your news source gave Obama for blaming Bush? It was FS then and it's FS now. Defend Trump's actions on their own.

When you hold your progressive hero’s to the same standard that you hold conservatives to (and Trump isn’t a conservative) then I’ll be interested in your take. Your entire spiel is straw mans and red herrings.

2001400ex said:

USMChawk said:

2001400ex said:

USMChawk said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.

You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.

No you aren't comparing shit. When Trump does something stupid. Your news source researches the shit out of it to find something Obama did that was maybe similar. To justify Trump's actions. Remember all the shit your news source gave Obama for blaming Bush? It was FS then and it's FS now. Defend Trump's actions on their own.

When you hold your progressive hero’s to the same standard that you hold conservatives to (and Trump isn’t a conservative) then I’ll be interested in your take. Your entire spiel is straw mans and red herrings.

Give an example where I don't give "my progressive heros" the same standard.

And my spiel is correcting dumbfucks like you that say stupid shit like Obama gave Iran hundreds of billions of dollars. Or Trump's approval rating is 36% among black people.

Give an example of where I talked about Obama giving billions of dollars to Iran or about Trump’s approval rating being 36%.

My criticism is relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without acknowledging Obama or Hillary.

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

pawz said:

RaceBannon said:

Hondo's embittered love affair with Hillary is the best part of this bored

No.

But it does make me think the Soros machine needs to pay @DerekJohnson for his spam.

I offered to pay @2001400ex membership for him as long as I got to add a signature of my choosing to each of his poasts.

He so far has ignored my offer...

@DerekJohnson and @Swaye . Is it possible for me to add a signature to all of @2001400ex poasts? I don't think its right for @DerekJohnson to be footing the bill for all the spam he poasts without paying his own way, and apparently he either can't afford to do it or his partner won't allow him so I've offered to sponsor him as long as I get to add a disclaimer/signature to all of his poasts.

Any way to do that?

I've donated twice. Last year was the wam. And this year I will when I feel like it. I don't react to people goading me to donate. But if you want to donate for me.... Go ahead.

Funny. You said that a while ago so I dropped it...and yet you still haven't ponied up.

Funny how that works...