Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
$39 billion bailout for industries affected by tariffs
Comments
-
I’d recommend a refresheroregonblitzkrieg said:
I've read his shit but its been awhile. Everyone has the right to control their own body and life, sure, up to the point where it infringes on someone else's life or liberty.MikeDamone said:
You’re not familiar with Locke? Are you being serious about not knowing what self ownership is? This leads me to believe you also are not clear on property rights.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.MikeDamone said:
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This is a Hondo level poast.MikeDamone said:
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.oregonblitzkrieg said:Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
-
Can't have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com cunt, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free Damone, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.MikeDamone said:
Link?oregonblitzkrieg said:
In another thread, unless you were trolling.MikeDamone said:
Where did I ever suggest a stateless society?oregonblitzkrieg said:How exactly would your stateless utopia function in reality. No state, no military, no country. Putin and Xi would really like that.
-
Where did I ever suggest this?MikeDamone said:
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This is a Hondo level poast.MikeDamone said:
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.oregonblitzkrieg said:Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
-
No link. That’s what I thought. Because I never said that.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Can't have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com cunt, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free Damone, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.MikeDamone said:
Link?oregonblitzkrieg said:
In another thread, unless you were trolling.MikeDamone said:
Where did I ever suggest a stateless society?oregonblitzkrieg said:How exactly would your stateless utopia function in reality. No state, no military, no country. Putin and Xi would really like that.
-
You're the resident tome of economics history and scholarship. But I'm not sure you consider all of the possible outcomes if the philosophies you follow were into practice. For example, what level of social unrest would be caused by an open borders policy, and how would it be contained? If the people in a libertarian country voted in a communist government, what would happen then? It doesn't seem to have the answers to those kinds of questions. Libertarianism doesn't seem capable of defending its own existence in certain situations.MikeDamone said:
I’d recommend a refresheroregonblitzkrieg said:
I've read his shit but its been awhile. Everyone has the right to control their own body and life, sure, up to the point where it infringes on someone else's life or liberty.MikeDamone said:
You’re not familiar with Locke? Are you being serious about not knowing what self ownership is? This leads me to believe you also are not clear on property rights.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.MikeDamone said:
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This is a Hondo level poast.MikeDamone said:
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.oregonblitzkrieg said:Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
-
You create some nice strawmen to attack.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're the resident tome of economics history and scholarship. But I'm not sure you consider all of the possible outcomes if the philosophies you follow were into practice. For example, what level of social unrest would be caused by an open borders policy, and how would it be contained? If the people in a libertarian country voted in a communist government, what would happen then? It doesn't seem to have the answers to those kinds of questions. It doesn't seem capable of defending its own existence.MikeDamone said:
I’d recommend a refresheroregonblitzkrieg said:
I've read his shit but its been awhile. Everyone has the right to control their own body and life, sure, up to the point where it infringes on someone else's life or liberty.MikeDamone said:
You’re not familiar with Locke? Are you being serious about not knowing what self ownership is? This leads me to believe you also are not clear on property rights.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.MikeDamone said:
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This is a Hondo level poast.MikeDamone said:
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.oregonblitzkrieg said:Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
What is the basis for the assumption that there would be social unrest? People only immigrante if there is opportunity. If there is little opportunity there is no immigration. -
OBK? Property? ROFLMikeDamone said:
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.oregonblitzkrieg said:Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
-
-
I dig this response. From the dude who is a master at putting words in people's mouths.MikeDamone said:
No link. That’s what I thought. Because I never said that.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Can't have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com cunt, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free Damone, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.MikeDamone said:
Link?oregonblitzkrieg said:
In another thread, unless you were trolling.MikeDamone said:
Where did I ever suggest a stateless society?oregonblitzkrieg said:How exactly would your stateless utopia function in reality. No state, no military, no country. Putin and Xi would really like that.
-
It's Tommy's dream chick.Pitchfork51 said:
