Da fuq?
Comments
-
That clerk is a member of the US Air Force.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
Didn't realize Kaepernick posted on these boards. -
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal. -
Nope @salemcoog . I was responding to the "Religion good, atheism bad, because Hitler/Stalin" cliché what OBK was using.salemcoog said:
But the Crusades!!!! POTD.RaceBannon said:
Bull shit stretchYellowSnow said:
OBK you ignorant slut, what the fuck is this shit? Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism. Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way). Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.oregonblitzkrieg said:Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian
Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.
So it's religions fault that Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc. abandoned God and killed Millions of people thereafter????
'Ol yellow leg's putting those atrocities in Religion's column.
That's bad logic at work there.
And a bad use of the quote feature by myself. -
doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
He didn’t buy a military weapon. All weapons in his possession were illegal for this shooter to own. This shooter knew attempting to buy a weapon was a crime. He did it anyway. Any new law you can concoct today, doesn’t change that fact.Mosster47 said:
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
Human error is to blame combined with a lack of respect for the law. -
Then how the fuck is this a zillion times more of a problem in America compared to the rest of the world?doogie said:doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
He didn’t buy a military weapon. All weapons in his possession were illegal for this shooter to own. This shooter knew attempting to buy a weapon was a crime. He did it anyway. Any new law you can concoct today, doesn’t change that fact.Mosster47 said:
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
Human error is to blame combined with a lack of respect for the law.
An AR-15 is an M-16 with a different trigger. An AR-15 with a 30 round magazine would put you on par with everyone around you on a battle field.
You can't redneck NRA your way out of these things. -
NRA had nothing to do with this shooting. No NRA member has ever been involved with a mass shooting.
Stop deflecting. Stop letting your emotions run away with your logic. Get control. Think. -
doogie said:
NRA had nothing to do with this shooting. No NRA member has ever been involved with a mass shooting.
Stop deflecting. Stop letting your emotions run away with your logic. Get control. Think.
-
HuffPo is my source.AZDuck said:doogie said:NRA had nothing to do with this shooting. No NRA member has ever been involved with a mass shooting.
Stop deflecting. Stop letting your emotions run away with your logic. Get control. Think. -
you're not supposed to spoil the funGrundleStiltzkin said:
HuffPo is my source.AZDuck said:doogie said:NRA had nothing to do with this shooting. No NRA member has ever been involved with a mass shooting.
Stop deflecting. Stop letting your emotions run away with your logic. Get control. Think. -
Disagree.AZDuck said:
you're not supposed to spoil the funGrundleStiltzkin said:
HuffPo is my source.AZDuck said:doogie said:NRA had nothing to do with this shooting. No NRA member has ever been involved with a mass shooting.
Stop deflecting. Stop letting your emotions run away with your logic. Get control. Think.
But good try, good effort. -
Not BroncFan55 busting five reasons, but the same concept, man.
Also but still, an NRA member taught Adam Lanza gun safety, ergo an NRA member was involved with that mass shooting.
QED. -
Who said any NRA member was a shooter? here's an interesting article.doogie said:NRA had nothing to do with this shooting. No NRA member has ever been involved with a mass shooting.
Stop deflecting. Stop letting your emotions run away with your logic. Get control. Think.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/mass-shootings-in-america/ -
The childlike faith in government. Let's look at the ways in which the government let you down:
The Texas mass murderer was charged with animal cruelty. The charges were dropped even though he lied and refused to cooperate.
The Texas mass murderer was committed to a mental hospital, he escaped. But nothing was done about it.
While in the military he made death threats against his superiors and tried to smuggle weapons onto the base. None of that mattered.
The only reason he was court-martialed? He assaulted his wife and young son and served 12 months in prison. The Air Force did not report the criminal conviction to the FBI and as a result was not entered into the National Instant Criminal Background Check.
That allowed the murder to buy guns, killing dozens and wounding more.
While some cry out the government should ban guns, what really happened?
Because the government failed to do its job, a private citizen was forced to take action.
-
What person, with any power, is calling to ban guns?Dude61 said:The childlike faith in government. Let's look at the ways in which the government let you down:
The Texas mass murderer was charged with animal cruelty. The charges were dropped even though he lied and refused to cooperate.
The Texas mass murderer was committed to a mental hospital, he escaped. But nothing was done about it.
While in the military he made death threats against his superiors and tried to smuggle weapons onto the base. None of that mattered.
The only reason he was court-martialed? He assaulted his wife and young son and served 12 months in prison. The Air Force did not report the criminal conviction to the FBI and as a result was not entered into the National Instant Criminal Background Check.
That allowed the murder to buy guns, killing dozens and wounding more.
While some cry out the government should ban guns, what really happened?
Because the government failed to do its job, a private citizen was forced to take action. -
I hate Vanilla.
-
It looks like MikeDamone thinks you're a faggot.dflea said:
Sure as fuck did.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You walked into that one Sled.2001400ex said:
Then why do you agree with the war on drugs? If everyone can just buy them anyway?Sledog said:
Yes I did. Can you buy heroin? Still illegal.2001400ex said:
You didn't answer the question.Sledog said:
Prohibited people are prohibited from purchase or possession. You should know this. Blame the US military. He passed the background check. So as always your Soros talking points are bullshit.2001400ex said:
You are clearly confusing the ability to purchase versus the ability to possess. There are many legal ways for people to buy guns who are not allowed to possess guns. Why do you think it violates the second amendment to require background checks on all purchases?Sledog said:
Imagine if someone present had a gun. You can't stop these types of people from obtaining weapons. You can shoot them dead.2001400ex said:
Are you talking to yourself?Sledog said:
I'm right but there is nothing unusual about that.Sledog said:
Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?Sledog said:
That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Terrorists.Sledog said:Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.
The word is terrorists.
Hope this helps.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/texas-church-shooting-who-is-gunman-devin-patrick-kelley.html
And he was able to legally purchase the weapon. Even tho US law says he can't. Imagine if we were to close gun show, internet, and private sale loopholes.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/air-force-didnt-report-texas-shooters-domestic-violence-conviction-to-federal-database-allowing-him-to-buy-guns.html
Anyone with a brain would have seen it coming - but this is Sledog.
And double fuck him for getting me to upvote a Hondo post. -
Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?
-
-
It is in a ton of states. Do you know why?GrundleStiltzkin said: -
Queery: Does the second amendment exist only to ensure hunters have access to hunting rifles?Mosster47 said:Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?
-
If he has time to go around flagging my posts then he's a bigger buttfuck than you are, and that takes some doing.oregonblitzkrieg said:
It looks like MikeDamone thinks you're a faggot.
Be sure to tell him I said that next time you're smoking his pole.
-
Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.Mosster47 said:
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck. -
Imagine how much cooler the shoot out at the OK corral would have been with Glocks and AR's instead of six shooters and double barrels.Sledog said:
Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.Mosster47 said:
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck. -
Way less fucking coolYellowSnow said:
Imagine how much cooler the shoot out at the OK corral would have been with Glocks and AR's instead of six shooters and double barrels.Sledog said:
Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.Mosster47 said:
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck. -
Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?Sledog said:
Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.Mosster47 said:
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people. -
NopeMosster47 said:
It is in a ton of states. Do you know why?GrundleStiltzkin said: -
So people don't have the capacity to kill a mass amount of game animals.GrundleStiltzkin said:
NopeMosster47 said:
It is in a ton of states. Do you know why?GrundleStiltzkin said:
It somehow makes sense for deer, but for people it's the worst thing ever. -
ThanksMosster47 said:
So people don't have the capacity to kill a mass amount of game animals.GrundleStiltzkin said:
NopeMosster47 said:
It is in a ton of states. Do you know why?GrundleStiltzkin said:
It somehow makes sense for deer, but for people it's the worst thing ever. -
Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.Mosster47 said:
Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?Sledog said:
Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.Mosster47 said:
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people. -
Then why aren't you saying you should have full access to fully automatic weapons?Sledog said:
Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.Mosster47 said:
Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?Sledog said:
Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.Mosster47 said:
Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.doogie said:
Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.
A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.
The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.
There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
How does a background check infringe your gun ownership?
Why do you support felons not owning a gun?
