Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Da fuq?

1111214161722

Comments

  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    edited November 2017
    Not BroncFan55 busting five reasons, but the same concept, man.

    Also but still, an NRA member taught Adam Lanza gun safety, ergo an NRA member was involved with that mass shooting.

    QED.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    NRA had nothing to do with this shooting. No NRA member has ever been involved with a mass shooting.

    Stop deflecting. Stop letting your emotions run away with your logic. Get control. Think.

    Who said any NRA member was a shooter? here's an interesting article.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/mass-shootings-in-america/
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    The childlike faith in government. Let's look at the ways in which the government let you down:

    The Texas mass murderer was charged with animal cruelty. The charges were dropped even though he lied and refused to cooperate.

    The Texas mass murderer was committed to a mental hospital, he escaped. But nothing was done about it.

    While in the military he made death threats against his superiors and tried to smuggle weapons onto the base. None of that mattered.

    The only reason he was court-martialed? He assaulted his wife and young son and served 12 months in prison. The Air Force did not report the criminal conviction to the FBI and as a result was not entered into the National Instant Criminal Background Check.

    That allowed the murder to buy guns, killing dozens and wounding more.

    While some cry out the government should ban guns, what really happened?

    Because the government failed to do its job, a private citizen was forced to take action.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Dude61 said:

    The childlike faith in government. Let's look at the ways in which the government let you down:

    The Texas mass murderer was charged with animal cruelty. The charges were dropped even though he lied and refused to cooperate.

    The Texas mass murderer was committed to a mental hospital, he escaped. But nothing was done about it.

    While in the military he made death threats against his superiors and tried to smuggle weapons onto the base. None of that mattered.

    The only reason he was court-martialed? He assaulted his wife and young son and served 12 months in prison. The Air Force did not report the criminal conviction to the FBI and as a result was not entered into the National Instant Criminal Background Check.

    That allowed the murder to buy guns, killing dozens and wounding more.

    While some cry out the government should ban guns, what really happened?

    Because the government failed to do its job, a private citizen was forced to take action.

    What person, with any power, is calling to ban guns?
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    I hate Vanilla.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    dflea said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.
    I'm right but there is nothing unusual about that.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/texas-church-shooting-who-is-gunman-devin-patrick-kelley.html

    Are you talking to yourself?

    And he was able to legally purchase the weapon. Even tho US law says he can't. Imagine if we were to close gun show, internet, and private sale loopholes.
    Imagine if someone present had a gun. You can't stop these types of people from obtaining weapons. You can shoot them dead.
    You are clearly confusing the ability to purchase versus the ability to possess. There are many legal ways for people to buy guns who are not allowed to possess guns. Why do you think it violates the second amendment to require background checks on all purchases?
    Prohibited people are prohibited from purchase or possession. You should know this. Blame the US military. He passed the background check. So as always your Soros talking points are bullshit.


    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/air-force-didnt-report-texas-shooters-domestic-violence-conviction-to-federal-database-allowing-him-to-buy-guns.html
    You didn't answer the question.
    Yes I did. Can you buy heroin? Still illegal.
    Then why do you agree with the war on drugs? If everyone can just buy them anyway?
    You walked into that one Sled.
    Sure as fuck did.

    Anyone with a brain would have seen it coming - but this is Sledog.

    And double fuck him for getting me to upvote a Hondo post.
    It looks like MikeDamone thinks you're a faggot.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?

    It is?
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?

    It is?
    It is in a ton of states. Do you know why?
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?

    Queery: Does the second amendment exist only to ensure hunters have access to hunting rifles?