Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Willie Taggart

Swaye
Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
in College Football Forum
Extend him now!
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1345678

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,085
    Swaye said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    Slingblade was their Lambo, but Faggert does not look even as good as Slick Rick. If their next three hires are Gilby, Tryone and Dude bruh, it's over for them. Uncle Phil will be dead soon anyway.

    BONEM!
    Is there room for two Black Sarks?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PineapplePirate
    PineapplePirate Member Posts: 4,643
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    F-4-T
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    Slightly better than the Canes
    You were so much better. This ain't even bait. Jesus. Get to Mt Zion this morning with your wife and get some perspective.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    edited October 2017
    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    No, it doesn't. I'm pretty sure you don't know that just yet. In any event, they've done what they've done and they're ranked where they are. My database isn't full of examples of successful PAC 12 teams with freshman QBs pressed into a starting role.

    #Rent check.

    #7-6.

    #We?wereready2rackhim.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Muttzen
    Muttzen Member Posts: 1,015
    Peterman took 3 years to get his guys in there.

    But Taggert does seem like black Ron Zook so far.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    creepycoug said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    No, it doesn't. I'm pretty sure you don't know that just yet. In any event, they've done what they've done and they're ranked where they are. My database isn't full of examples of successful PAC 12 teams with freshman QBs pressed into a starting role.

    #Rent check.

    #7-6.

    #We?wereready2rackhim.
    You have no idea what you are talking about. Take a seat with Mosster.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,741 Founders Club
    edited October 2017
    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    Slightly better than the Canes
    You were so much better. This ain't even bait. Jesus. Get to Mt Zion this morning with your wife and get some perspective.
    Cmon creep, it is hard to hold your practice squad to this kind of yardage, let alone getting everyone's best shot every week.

    I think the cpugs are pretty good. They've properly done what losers do and suck for 3 years until they have all seniors and a good duct-taped together quarterback.

    There is no excuse for this UW team to have a close game with them in Seattle though.

    Miami looks good, probably a year away from contending.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    RaceBannon said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    Slightly better than the Canes
    You were so much better. This ain't even bait. Jesus. Get to Mt Zion this morning with your wife and get some perspective.
    Looks like you took the bait
    No; it looks like I didn't. That we banter is axiomatic. I only check out when I check out. I'm not checked out. Don't flatter yourself white center.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    CuntWaffle said:

    creepycoug said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    No, it doesn't. I'm pretty sure you don't know that just yet. In any event, they've done what they've done and they're ranked where they are. My database isn't full of examples of successful PAC 12 teams with freshman QBs pressed into a starting role.

    #Rent check.

    #7-6.

    #We?wereready2rackhim.
    You have no idea what you are talking about. Take a seat with Mosster.
    7-6. I know that. Fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    haie said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    Slightly better than the Canes
    You were so much better. This ain't even bait. Jesus. Get to Mt Zion this morning with your wife and get some perspective.
    Cmon creep, it is hard to hold your practice squad to this kind of yardage, let alone getting everyone's best shot every week.

    I think the cpugs are pretty good. They've properly done what losers do and suck for 3 years until they have all seniors and a good duct-taped together quarterback.

    There is no excuse for this UW team to have a close game with them in Seattle though.

    Miami looks good, probably a year away from contending.
    The point of the poast wasn't to argue that Oregon is a good team in disguise. It's the conclusion on the coaching staff.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    bananasnblondes said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    I love how you started by accusing me of sounding dawgman/ Kim-like and then proceed to explain-away a 4-score loss to the coogs at home
    Do you love it? What part did I get wrong?

    Good post Grinolds.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    I love how you started by accusing me of sounding dawgman/ Kim-like and then proceed to explain-away a 4-score loss to the coogs at home
    Do you love it? What part did I get wrong?

    Good post Grinolds.
    Everything
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,741 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    haie said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    Slightly better than the Canes
    You were so much better. This ain't even bait. Jesus. Get to Mt Zion this morning with your wife and get some perspective.
    Cmon creep, it is hard to hold your practice squad to this kind of yardage, let alone getting everyone's best shot every week.

    I think the cpugs are pretty good. They've properly done what losers do and suck for 3 years until they have all seniors and a good duct-taped together quarterback.

    There is no excuse for this UW team to have a close game with them in Seattle though.

    Miami looks good, probably a year away from contending.
    The point of the poast wasn't to argue that Oregon is a good team in disguise. It's the conclusion on the coaching staff.
    Sure, it's not entirely reasonable to dismiss UW 2014 and shit all over Taggert in year 1.

    if I were a duck fan, I would would be nervous this staff is closer to Helton than Petersen. And I would be angry with the AD for shirking Row The Boat at this point as well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    CuntWaffle said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    I love how you started by accusing me of sounding dawgman/ Kim-like and then proceed to explain-away a 4-score loss to the coogs at home
    Do you love it? What part did I get wrong?

    Good post Grinolds.
    Everything
    You mad?

    I didnt explain away a loss Kris. I explained away how FS it is to conclude that Taggart is doomed based on that loss. I know reading isn't your strong suit.

    And I don't know a single person who's been watching college football for more than a couple of years riding on the Peterman train and who isn't retarded who thinks that. Congratulations. You must be retarded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    creepycoug said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    I love how you started by accusing me of sounding dawgman/ Kim-like and then proceed to explain-away a 4-score loss to the coogs at home
    Do you love it? What part did I get wrong?

    Good post Grinolds.
    Everything
    You mad?

    I didnt explain away a loss Kris. I explained away how FS it is to conclude that Taggart is doomed based on that loss. I know reading isn't your strong suit.

    And I don't know a single person who's been watching college football for more than a couple of years riding on the Peterman train and who isn't retarded who thinks that. Congratulations. You must be retarded.
    Nope. You seem upset though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    haie said:

    creepycoug said:

    haie said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    The Cougs are not a good team. HTH.

    Slightly better than the Canes
    You were so much better. This ain't even bait. Jesus. Get to Mt Zion this morning with your wife and get some perspective.
    Cmon creep, it is hard to hold your practice squad to this kind of yardage, let alone getting everyone's best shot every week.

    I think the cpugs are pretty good. They've properly done what losers do and suck for 3 years until they have all seniors and a good duct-taped together quarterback.

    There is no excuse for this UW team to have a close game with them in Seattle though.

    Miami looks good, probably a year away from contending.
    The point of the poast wasn't to argue that Oregon is a good team in disguise. It's the conclusion on the coaching staff.
    Sure, it's not entirely reasonable to dismiss UW 2014 and shit all over Taggert in year 1.

    if I were a duck fan, I would would be nervous this staff is closer to Helton than Petersen. And I would be angry with the AD for shirking Row The Boat at this point as well.
    You don't know until you know. Couple years ago, there were more than a few Sallys around here growing pretty impatient with Peterman. I remember who they were. 7-6.

    As far as I can tell, Taggart has put together a good staff. Getting Levitt was huge. Cristobal is a very well respected young coach. 99% of the cffootball world thought FIU was retarded to let him go. And he recruits lights out. And he's a Cane.

    The point, which has soared over the heads of my friends here, is that Grinold's post is more hopeful than it is reasonable. As people here should know all too well, it doesn't take long for a bad staff to make a big mess. Playing tough for a half, and then losing big to one of the better cuog teams in the last several years, isn't much on which to draw a firm conclusion.

    It's pretty simple. Their D is playing well enough to keep them in games, but their offense can't stay on the field. They are thin at receiver, and now have a freshman who doesn't know what the fuck he's doing under center. For any coaching staff, those are bad facts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    CuntWaffle said:

    creepycoug said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    I love how you started by accusing me of sounding dawgman/ Kim-like and then proceed to explain-away a 4-score loss to the coogs at home
    Do you love it? What part did I get wrong?

    Good post Grinolds.
    Everything
    You mad?

    I didnt explain away a loss Kris. I explained away how FS it is to conclude that Taggart is doomed based on that loss. I know reading isn't your strong suit.

    And I don't know a single person who's been watching college football for more than a couple of years riding on the Peterman train and who isn't retarded who thinks that. Congratulations. You must be retarded.
    Nope. You seem upset though.
    Nope. Not at all. I live for this shit. Are you new here?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    Disagree.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    dflea said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    Disagree.
    7-6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    it's hard for me to hear about the year 1 excuse for faggart (which is fair) at the same time mosster and blitzkrieg talk about how amazing Oregon is right now
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    creepycoug said:

    dflea said:

    creepycoug said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon is in some serious shit. They have a current crop of players who already have a history of quitting when faced with adversity.

    They also have a recruiting class filled with "committed but i will still take all my visits" kids from the East coast who bought into this idea that Oregon was back, baby.

    Then there's the coaching staff who looks like shit.

    They needed to win this year.

    You sound hopeful, but this is a bit dawgman. Even Kim-like.

    A few data points:

    They're not in fact quitting;
    Their defense is playing well, especially considering their offense can't stay on the field;
    Credit this to the new staff.

    But that staff also inherited a team with one functional qb, who is now down, and they're light on receivers (bump creepy's poast about dismissing Carrington).

    It's easy to say "just run the ball on every play" but that only works in your living room. Against good teams, and the the Cuogs are a good team, you have to be able to hurt a defense stacking the box. Oregon can't do that right now and has a kid who can't make easy reads because he's not ready for PAC 12 play. None of this spells " you fucked up with Taggart." We are well within LIPO.

    I don't think their recruiting profile is exactly unique.

    Finally, 8-6; 7-6.

    Now 6-0 and coming off a pretend run at the title, and this is all anyone here cares about. Tell Willie his rent check is overdue.
    Disagree.
    7-6
    Disagree.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter