Dylan Morris, 4* 2019 QB, Graham (Graham-Kapowsin), WA (COMMITTED)
Comments
-
Yes. It wasn't "shit" but it also wasn't spectacular. If Jake doesn't throw that stupid pic 6 in the first half the game would've still been in reach.RoadDawg55 said:
I never really thought of it like that, but it's a brilliant point.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our offense was Jack Pardee bullshit. We plowed bad teams and scored 7-10 points against good teams.Passion said:
Disagree. Smith's area of the team put up big numbers and he produced the 6th place vote-getter for the Heisman.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Disagree: Sirmon was Pete, Yankoff was Lubick and this was Pete.dnc said:@Babushka officially moves out of the shit tier recruiters with this one. That's three 4 star QB's in two classes. Yeah two of them are in state and one of them came because of Lubick, but scorebored is all that matters. Smiff's scorebored looks pretty good of late. Especially given the RISE concerns.
Not saying he's Lubick or Lake, don't twist. But he's at least in the Bonerpoppa/PaoPao tier as opposed to the Malloe/Strausser tier where he was before.
Incremental progress and chit.
The only one that wasn't a chip in was Yankoff and that was all Lubick/Pete.
If we pull Tanner McKee and he cites Smith, then we can talk.
Babushka helps, though admittedly he may need Pete of Lubick to seal the deal. Malloe just needs to go away.
I've said it a million times, if you give up 45 points in critical games, but only 10 against bad offenses you are not a good defense.
If you score 50+ against shit teams and 7 against a good one, you are not a good offense.
We have a better team than everyone. That's why we scored. Our offense is dreck against similar competition.
The one thing I did love about last year was it was the first year in forever we pushed guys around. We couldn't have pushed a team like Utah or Stanford around in previous years. I would call it a pretty good, much improved offense.
Our OLs did pretty well in nearly all games. When is the last time we could say that? -
The USC game was a horribly called game. No reason to abandon the run like that. Coleman getting two carries was a tragedy. Maybe we still would have lost, but it was puzzling.Passion said:
Yes. It wasn't "shit" but it also wasn't spectacular. If Jake doesn't throw that stupid pic 6 in the first half the game would've still been in reach.RoadDawg55 said:
I never really thought of it like that, but it's a brilliant point.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our offense was Jack Pardee bullshit. We plowed bad teams and scored 7-10 points against good teams.Passion said:
Disagree. Smith's area of the team put up big numbers and he produced the 6th place vote-getter for the Heisman.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Disagree: Sirmon was Pete, Yankoff was Lubick and this was Pete.dnc said:@Babushka officially moves out of the shit tier recruiters with this one. That's three 4 star QB's in two classes. Yeah two of them are in state and one of them came because of Lubick, but scorebored is all that matters. Smiff's scorebored looks pretty good of late. Especially given the RISE concerns.
Not saying he's Lubick or Lake, don't twist. But he's at least in the Bonerpoppa/PaoPao tier as opposed to the Malloe/Strausser tier where he was before.
Incremental progress and chit.
The only one that wasn't a chip in was Yankoff and that was all Lubick/Pete.
If we pull Tanner McKee and he cites Smith, then we can talk.
Babushka helps, though admittedly he may need Pete of Lubick to seal the deal. Malloe just needs to go away.
I've said it a million times, if you give up 45 points in critical games, but only 10 against bad offenses you are not a good defense.
If you score 50+ against shit teams and 7 against a good one, you are not a good offense.
We have a better team than everyone. That's why we scored. Our offense is dreck against similar competition.
The one thing I did love about last year was it was the first year in forever we pushed guys around. We couldn't have pushed a team like Utah or Stanford around in previous years. I would call it a pretty good, much improved offense.
Our OLs did pretty well in nearly all games. When is the last time we could say that?
I don't think the outcome would have been any different against Alabama, but I wish we ran it more in that one too. The pick 6 fucked us and we stopped running the ball in the 2nd half. In hindsight, I wish we wouldn't have panicked and continued to run the ball. Make it a longer game. We had chances for turnovers on D. Psalm botched picking up a loose ball.
Forcing a defense to bring it constantly can lull them to sleep, miss a gap, etc. -
Browning's head. They played Alabama. Their All-American 1st rounder destroyed our freshman OL. A Heisman contender QB'ing a playoff team throws the ball away. 3rd down and 10.Tequilla said:
Browning made the wrong read ... but where did the pressure come from on that play?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
He's right, you know. The offense generated two touchdowns after all.Tequilla said:
Alabama had superior talent ... in both games we lost our struggles started on the OL and in particular on the C and RG positionsWeakarmCobra said:
I guess having superior athletes did not help last year. Everytime UW played a team of same talent level it had trouble.Tequilla said:
Babushka is far from perfect as an OC ... but if you look at our results on offense last year it's hard to be very critical of the job Babushka did on the wholeWeakarmCobra said:
Half of the job is to coach and other to recruit. He still sux as an OCdnc said:@Babushka officially moves out of the shit tier recruiters with this one. That's three 4 star QB's in two classes. Yeah two of them are in state and one of them came because of Lubick, but scorebored is all that matters. Smiff's scorebored looks pretty good of late. Especially given the RISE concerns.
Not saying he's Lubick or Lake, don't twist. But he's at least in the Bonerpoppa/PaoPao tier as opposed to the Malloe/Strausser tier where he was before.
Incremental progress and chit.
Also in both games you can really argue that Browning's shoulder issues also were limiting
The game plan against Alabama actually wasn't that bad ... we did a lot of good things there (more than what many would admit)
-
Smith is wearing the kind of shirt a chick with small breasts wears to use an optical illusion to make them look bigger.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
Tedford.Tequilla said:
Babushka is far from perfect as an OC ... but if you look at our results on offense last year it's hard to be very critical of the job Babushka did on the wholeWeakarmCobra said:
Half of the job is to coach and other to recruit. He still sux as an OCdnc said:@Babushka officially moves out of the shit tier recruiters with this one. That's three 4 star QB's in two classes. Yeah two of them are in state and one of them came because of Lubick, but scorebored is all that matters. Smiff's scorebored looks pretty good of late. Especially given the RISE concerns.
Not saying he's Lubick or Lake, don't twist. But he's at least in the Bonerpoppa/PaoPao tier as opposed to the Malloe/Strausser tier where he was before.
Incremental progress and chit. -
This. As soon as Tedford left, there was a noticeable drop in quality of playcalling.Mad_Son said:
Tedford.Tequilla said:
Babushka is far from perfect as an OC ... but if you look at our results on offense last year it's hard to be very critical of the job Babushka did on the wholeWeakarmCobra said:
Half of the job is to coach and other to recruit. He still sux as an OCdnc said:@Babushka officially moves out of the shit tier recruiters with this one. That's three 4 star QB's in two classes. Yeah two of them are in state and one of them came because of Lubick, but scorebored is all that matters. Smiff's scorebored looks pretty good of late. Especially given the RISE concerns.
Not saying he's Lubick or Lake, don't twist. But he's at least in the Bonerpoppa/PaoPao tier as opposed to the Malloe/Strausser tier where he was before.
Incremental progress and chit. -
I will give props to Smith where they are due. He looks like he's actually gotten a normal fucking haircut, is not slouching horribly, and could pass for a football coach.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
CRISPR.Sources said:...As soon as Tedford left, there was a noticeable
droprise in quality ofplaycallingopponents. -
Didn't realize USC and Bama called all those pass plays for us. Thanks for clarifying.TTJ said:
CRISPR.Sources said:...As soon as Tedford left, there was a noticeable
droprise in quality ofplaycallingopponents.
I think it's more accurate to say that because we played tougher opponents, we couldn't just chuck it up and score TDs. Babushka got exposed. -
Same talent level? TF are you smoking? Are you reading Dennis' hyperbole and taking that shit literally?WeakarmCobra said:
I guess having superior athletes did not help last year. Everytime UW played a team of same talent level it had trouble.Tequilla said:
Babushka is far from perfect as an OC ... but if you look at our results on offense last year it's hard to be very critical of the job Babushka did on the wholeWeakarmCobra said:
Half of the job is to coach and other to recruit. He still sux as an OCdnc said:@Babushka officially moves out of the shit tier recruiters with this one. That's three 4 star QB's in two classes. Yeah two of them are in state and one of them came because of Lubick, but scorebored is all that matters. Smiff's scorebored looks pretty good of late. Especially given the RISE concerns.
Not saying he's Lubick or Lake, don't twist. But he's at least in the Bonerpoppa/PaoPao tier as opposed to the Malloe/Strausser tier where he was before.
Incremental progress and chit.
UW's offense did not have similar talent to USC and Alabama's defenses. Holy fuck we weren't in the same talent universe with Alabama's defense. Bama's defense had three first round picks. They had 6 players picked in the top 3 rounds and another in the 4th. UW's offense had 1 player picked. That's it. And yes it was younger than Bama's defense, but UW's 11 starters in that game will not touch any of Bama's 2017 draft marks over all the drafts they're eligible for. And the fact UW was a lot younger doesn't help the case.
Only the doogliest fucking doog thinks UW was an even talent matchup with Alafuckingbama. That was a talent mismatch, especially UW's offense against Bama's defense. That's as dumb as coogs claiming their talent is equal to ours.
Never in my lifetime have we had an offense with equal talent to USC's defense. We certainly didn't this year - their defense had three times as many people drafted as our offense did. And they bring at least as many high draftees back as our offense does, probably more.
The truth is UW's offense did play a couple of defenses they had similar talent with this year. Oregon and Stanford. And they annihilated them.
You could probably throw Colorado in there too, their defense was very talented. The passing game struggled against them but the running game kicked ass and we ran it 30 more times than we threw. Hard to be too critical there.
I'm mad we didn't play better against SC and Bama too. But think about what you're saying. Only on an extreme doog message bored would anyone even think about claiming UW's offense had similar talent to Bama's defense.
