Congratulations to all those who


BIG BALLS BOB
Comments
-
Suck it Coker and nacho lover. Bishop Blanchet class of 1983!BearsWiin said:have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution
BIG BALLS BOB -
Lives on EAST Queen Anne hill too.BearsWiin said:have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution
BIG BALLS BOB -
Hope Trump sends him to Auschwitz.
-
Sea-Town SMARTPurpleJ said:Hope Trump sends him to Auschwitz.
-
YesBearsWiin said:have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution
BIG BALLS BOB -
1st quarter lead posts of the night
-
Now we are definitely going to be killed by those refugees that have spent the past two years being vetted.
-
I'm just happy Refugees who end up in Seattle get to live in the Brand New "affordable housing" projects all around the city.
-
We can beat the Tide!RaceBannon said:1st quarter lead posts of the night
-
BearsWiin said:
have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution
BIG BALLS BOB
Thanks,http://www.staradvertiser.com/2017/02/03/breaking-news/hawaii-sues-trump-over-immigration-ban/
-
This is embarrassing:
"Judge Robart asks DOJ's Bennet how many arrests of foreign nationals there have been from the 7 countries since 9/11.
She [Bennett] says she doesn't know.
Judge Robart says "None as I can tell". He [Judge Robart] continues: "You're here arguing on behalf of someone who says we have to protect the US from these individuals coming from these countries, and there's no support for that".
DOJ's Bennett says that POTUS gets to make the call and the court doesn't get "to look behind those determinations".
Judge Robart says that he's looking to see if the immigration order is "rationally based", he [Judge Robart] says "I have to find facts as opposed to fiction"." -
Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
-
You're talking about the executive order, right?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
-
Most likely to be overturned on appeal.
-
No one knows who this faggot is and no one cares. HTH.
-
He's my neighbor.
-
24-7. You won't be playing in the championship.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We can beat the Tide!RaceBannon said:1st quarter lead posts of the night
-
I was playing along with Race. You're a humorless cunt.oregonblitzkrieg said:
24-7. You won't be playing in the championship.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We can beat the Tide!RaceBannon said:1st quarter lead posts of the night
-
The constitution doesn't apply to foreign nationals. GTFO.
-
4 am is the best time to be mad online.oregonblitzkrieg said:The constitution doesn't apply to foreign nationals. GTFO.
-
Wait...he's the guy whose fence you jumped after getting caught fucking his daughter?!?!ThomasFremont said:He's my neighbor.
Wow.
Ballsy. Kudos.
-
Is he cross-eyed? Or what's going on there?BearsWiin said:have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution
BIG BALLS BOB -
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned -
Pretty easy to tear the EO apart if the court uses any heightened scrutiny, but on rational basis alone the feds stand a good chance of prevailing if for no other reason than the onus being on the WA AG to show no rational basis behind the EO.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned -
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned -
You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.Dude61 said:
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned
So a wall is a solution without a problem. -
Then why are you in perpetual menstruation over immigration?
-
Me? I just said the Muslim ban is a joke. And the constitutional judges agree.doogie said:Then why are you in perpetual menstruation over immigration?
HTH -
My post concerned the cost to taxpayers, not the number of people entering or exiting the country. If you have a study showing that tax revenue the US receives from illegal immigration exceeding the cost, I would consider that.2001400ex said:
You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.Dude61 said:
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned
So a wall is a solution without a problem. -
So you are saying you want to keep the illegals in with a wall then?Dude61 said:
My post concerned the cost to taxpayers, not the number of people entering or exiting the country. If you have a study showing that tax revenue the US receives from illegal immigration exceeding the cost, I would consider that.2001400ex said:
You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.Dude61 said:
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned
So a wall is a solution without a problem.