Congratulations to all those who

BearsWiin said:

have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution



BIG BALLS BOB

Suck it Coker and nacho lover. Bishop Blanchet class of 1983!

BearsWiin said:

have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution



BIG BALLS BOB

Yes

Now we are definitely going to be killed by those refugees that have spent the past two years being vetted.

This is embarrassing:

"Judge Robart asks DOJ's Bennet how many arrests of foreign nationals there have been from the 7 countries since 9/11.

She [Bennett] says she doesn't know.

Judge Robart says "None as I can tell". He [Judge Robart] continues: "You're here arguing on behalf of someone who says we have to protect the US from these individuals coming from these countries, and there's no support for that".

DOJ's Bennett says that POTUS gets to make the call and the court doesn't get "to look behind those determinations".

Judge Robart says that he's looking to see if the immigration order is "rationally based", he [Judge Robart] says "I have to find facts as opposed to fiction"."

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

You're talking about the executive order, right?

No one knows who this faggot is and no one cares. HTH.

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:

1st quarter lead posts of the night

We can beat the Tide!

24-7. You won't be playing in the championship.

The constitution doesn't apply to foreign nationals. GTFO.

ThomasFremont said:

He's my neighbor.

Wait...he's the guy whose fence you jumped after getting caught fucking his daughter?!?!

Wow.

Ballsy. Kudos.

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

dhdawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.

Then why are you in perpetual menstruation over immigration?

2001400ex said:

Dude61 said:

dhdawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.

You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.

So a wall is a solution without a problem.

My post concerned the cost to taxpayers, not the number of people entering or exiting the country. If you have a study showing that tax revenue the US receives from illegal immigration exceeding the cost, I would consider that.