"Unbiased" Peach Bowl Preview ...
Comments
-
I recommend listening to Isaac Hayes while reading this long courtship thread.
-
She was hot while she lasted.EwaDawg said:
I was lucky enough to find the Budda shit after about 15 seconds. Basically said Budda is toast (@ 186 pounds) because they have a 240 pound fullback.MisterEm said:You watched that shit, @Tequilla?
C'mon man!
Dude certainly never watched Budda, or MF Jones, or Jo Jo play.
But I digress. You are correct. My grandma could put together a better analysis of the Peach Bowl and we all know she is dead.
Don't know what that dipshit's excuse is. -
You took a post I made that responded to 3 specific and unique points, made a couple of generic minor points largely unrelated to the content in question, and then did a victory lap celebrating your brevity.AlCzervik said:I could have said everything and more in a few sentences. Protect browning and move him out pocket. MAKE BROWNING GET RID OF BALL FAST (he holds ball too long, doesnt make quick decisions-throws). throw on 1st down until run game finds identity. Force Hurts into turnovers by stopping run. Score on special teams.
Only took pup 30 seconds as opposed to the 4 hours it took you cuntslice
Weird.
Also, "cuntslice?" Really? That's trying WAYYYYY too hard to look cool with one of those edgy old combo words like douche nozzle. You're whining about verbosity when "cunt" would have sufficed. You know, all the cool and totally non-trashy people use the word "cunt." -
I hear a lot of chatter about Browning's, ahem, "inexperience" (LOL!!!!!). What they don't realize is that Browning had four FULL years of high school under his belt before he even arrived and will do everything to win this game.Mad_Son said:
Man you're right! I bet we can really dominate the time of possession! Anything we can do to shorten the game and keep Alabama off the field will help us win the game.H_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
-
You need to PM @IrishDawg22. He's got this place dialed in and can help you understand some of the nuances like cuntslice.Secfans said:
You took a post I made that responded to 3 specific and unique points, made a couple of generic minor points largely unrelated to the content in question, and then did a victory lap celebrating your brevity.AlCzervik said:I could have said everything and more in a few sentences. Protect browning and move him out pocket. MAKE BROWNING GET RID OF BALL FAST (he holds ball too long, doesnt make quick decisions-throws). throw on 1st down until run game finds identity. Force Hurts into turnovers by stopping run. Score on special teams.
Only took pup 30 seconds as opposed to the 4 hours it took you cuntslice
Weird.
Also, "cuntslice?" Really? That's trying WAYYYYY too hard to look cool with one of those edgy old combo words like douche nozzle. You're whining about verbosity when "cunt" would have sufficed. You know, all the cool and totally non-trashy people use the word "cunt." -
Usually AIDS does start from the bottomsalemcoog said:My grandma could put together a better analysis of the Peach Bowl and we all know she is dead.
Sad the AIDS didn't start from the bottom down. -
It just illustrates a lack of creativity. I expected more from this place...CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
You need to PM @IrishDawg22. He's got this place dialed in and can help you understand some of the nuances like cuntslice.
-
Just send the PM to @IrishDawg22Secfans said:
It just illustrates a lack of creativity. I expected more from this place...CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
You need to PM @IrishDawg22. He's got this place dialed in and can help you understand some of the nuances like cuntslice. -
Why?Secfans said:
It just illustrates a lack of creativity. I expected more from this place...CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
You need to PM @IrishDawg22. He's got this place dialed in and can help you understand some of the nuances like cuntslice. -
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
-
You have absolutely no idea what's going on here.Secfans said:
It just illustrates a lack of creativity. I expected more from this place...CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
You need to PM @IrishDawg22. He's got this place dialed in and can help you understand some of the nuances like cuntslice. -
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 -
funny, this article talks about how small Alabama is playing this year. This writer KNOWS football
Foster might have gone through the most dramatic transformation. The senior from Auburn, Alabama, played last season at 240 pounds, but said he played middle linebacker this year between 220 and 225.
http://www.kitsapsun.com/story/sports/college/2016/12/27/alabama-defense-got-better-getting-lighter/95895884/
-
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 -
Bama lbs lost weight to get faster and quicker. Playing a lot of tempo teams required this. In the past, Bama has been exposed because the front 7 was too slow and couldn't contain dual threat QBs effectively. They lost enough to gain doped, but not too much that they lost power or strength.doogie said:funny, this article talks about how small Alabama is playing this year. This writer KNOWS football
Foster might have gone through the most dramatic transformation. The senior from Auburn, Alabama, played last season at 240 pounds, but said he played middle linebacker this year between 220 and 225.
http://www.kitsapsun.com/story/sports/college/2016/12/27/alabama-defense-got-better-getting-lighter/95895884/ -
Actually showed up with a grown Man team that was ready to play.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 -
Probably the opposite of what USC did when they lost by 17 to a team UW beat 44-6. CHRIST.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Washington&loser=Alabama&year=2016&method=2
-
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though. -
Combination of factors ...montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
1) Were able to exploit us in the passing game over the middle w TEs especially after Victor was injured
2) converted in the red zone
3) Really bad game plan by OC and Browning really panicked
4) SC was able to exploit the C-RG combo big time and combined w 3) able to really collapse the pocket
It's the worst game UW played all year by a wide margin ... in the long run, probably good for them to have gone through it -
The thing I think that you are missing is that setting up the run sets up other plays later in the game. When the run game is nullified it hampers the OC and disrupts the offensive game plan. If a team becomes one demensional they are a lot easier to beatMad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though. -
Great write up.Mad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
Lemme shorten it up for ya.
They put a little pressure on our noodle arm QB and he shit the bed. -
Seriously? It's easier to defend one dimensional offenses?montyfranklyn said:
The thing I think that you are missing is that setting up the run sets up other plays later in the game. When the run game is nullified it hampers the OC and disrupts the offensive game plan. If a team becomes one demensional they are a lot easier to beatMad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
We were never in a position through 3 quarters where we had to abandon the run. Even if it is just picking up 2 or 3 you have to be willing to stick with it to keep a defense honest. Lavon Coleman I believe had 2 carries during the game.
The other thing not mentioned is that was the week Jeff Tedford (our offensive consultant) took the Fresno job ... my guess is that Pete has had more of a hand in the game planning since the USC game -
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Alabama&loser=Washington&year=2016&method=2AlCzervik said:
Probably the opposite of what USC did when they lost by 17 to a team UW beat 44-6. CHRIST.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Washington&loser=Alabama&year=2016&method=2 -
It's funny that you decided to fag out HH this week since your shit team is done playing shit football for the year.salemcoog said:
Great write up.Mad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
Lemme shorten it up for ya.
They put a little pressure on our noodle arm QB and he shit the bed.
You should go kill yourself before your shit team starts playing shit football again next year. -
Lulz, just listened to the Alabama play by play guy confirm Alabama hasn't seen a team all season with as much balance as Washington who he calls the most balanced team in the country.
You guys need to compare your expert notes -
message bored are kool in that you can ignore what you wrote two-three pages ago and contradict yourself later in the same thread.montyfranklyn said:
Bama lbs lost weight to get faster and quicker. Playing a lot of tempo teams required this. In the past, Bama has been exposed because the front 7 was too slow and couldn't contain dual threat QBs effectively. They lost enough to gain doped, but not too much that they lost power or strength.doogie said:funny, this article talks about how small Alabama is playing this year. This writer KNOWS football
Foster might have gone through the most dramatic transformation. The senior from Auburn, Alabama, played last season at 240 pounds, but said he played middle linebacker this year between 220 and 225.
http://www.kitsapsun.com/story/sports/college/2016/12/27/alabama-defense-got-better-getting-lighter/95895884/ -
We haven't outside say Arkansas. Tell me what teams has Washington faced that was as balanced as Alabama?doogie said:Lulz, just listened to the Alabama play by play guy confirm Alabama hasn't seen a team all season with as much balance as Washington who he calls the most balanced team in the country.
You guys need to compare your expert notes -
You missed the point.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Alabama&loser=Washington&year=2016&method=2AlCzervik said:
Probably the opposite of what USC did when they lost by 17 to a team UW beat 44-6. CHRIST.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Washington&loser=Alabama&year=2016&method=2 -
You're now arguing with your play by play guy over Alabama's season. I assume, you're smarter?montyfranklyn said:
We haven't outside say Arkansas. Tell me what teams has Washington faced that was as balanced as Alabama?doogie said:Lulz, just listened to the Alabama play by play guy confirm Alabama hasn't seen a team all season with as much balance as Washington who he calls the most balanced team in the country.
You guys need to compare your expert notes -
I think you are trying to down play the common opponent point. The link you posted was clearly stupid because Bama beat the holy hell out of Mississippi State. Mississippi State also didn't have Chad Kelly. I know you all will harp on USC changing QBs, but QBs don't play defense. They just couldn't stop Bama.AlCzervik said:
You missed the point.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Alabama&loser=Washington&year=2016&method=2AlCzervik said:
Probably the opposite of what USC did when they lost by 17 to a team UW beat 44-6. CHRIST.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Washington&loser=Alabama&year=2016&method=2
