"Unbiased" Peach Bowl Preview ...
Comments
-
Great write up.Mad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
Lemme shorten it up for ya.
They put a little pressure on our noodle arm QB and he shit the bed. -
Seriously? It's easier to defend one dimensional offenses?montyfranklyn said:
The thing I think that you are missing is that setting up the run sets up other plays later in the game. When the run game is nullified it hampers the OC and disrupts the offensive game plan. If a team becomes one demensional they are a lot easier to beatMad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
We were never in a position through 3 quarters where we had to abandon the run. Even if it is just picking up 2 or 3 you have to be willing to stick with it to keep a defense honest. Lavon Coleman I believe had 2 carries during the game.
The other thing not mentioned is that was the week Jeff Tedford (our offensive consultant) took the Fresno job ... my guess is that Pete has had more of a hand in the game planning since the USC game -
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Alabama&loser=Washington&year=2016&method=2AlCzervik said:
Probably the opposite of what USC did when they lost by 17 to a team UW beat 44-6. CHRIST.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Washington&loser=Alabama&year=2016&method=2 -
It's funny that you decided to fag out HH this week since your shit team is done playing shit football for the year.salemcoog said:
Great write up.Mad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
Lemme shorten it up for ya.
They put a little pressure on our noodle arm QB and he shit the bed.
You should go kill yourself before your shit team starts playing shit football again next year. -
Lulz, just listened to the Alabama play by play guy confirm Alabama hasn't seen a team all season with as much balance as Washington who he calls the most balanced team in the country.
You guys need to compare your expert notes -
message bored are kool in that you can ignore what you wrote two-three pages ago and contradict yourself later in the same thread.montyfranklyn said:
Bama lbs lost weight to get faster and quicker. Playing a lot of tempo teams required this. In the past, Bama has been exposed because the front 7 was too slow and couldn't contain dual threat QBs effectively. They lost enough to gain doped, but not too much that they lost power or strength.doogie said:funny, this article talks about how small Alabama is playing this year. This writer KNOWS football
Foster might have gone through the most dramatic transformation. The senior from Auburn, Alabama, played last season at 240 pounds, but said he played middle linebacker this year between 220 and 225.
http://www.kitsapsun.com/story/sports/college/2016/12/27/alabama-defense-got-better-getting-lighter/95895884/ -
We haven't outside say Arkansas. Tell me what teams has Washington faced that was as balanced as Alabama?doogie said:Lulz, just listened to the Alabama play by play guy confirm Alabama hasn't seen a team all season with as much balance as Washington who he calls the most balanced team in the country.
You guys need to compare your expert notes -
You missed the point.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Alabama&loser=Washington&year=2016&method=2AlCzervik said:
Probably the opposite of what USC did when they lost by 17 to a team UW beat 44-6. CHRIST.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Washington&loser=Alabama&year=2016&method=2 -
You're now arguing with your play by play guy over Alabama's season. I assume, you're smarter?montyfranklyn said:
We haven't outside say Arkansas. Tell me what teams has Washington faced that was as balanced as Alabama?doogie said:Lulz, just listened to the Alabama play by play guy confirm Alabama hasn't seen a team all season with as much balance as Washington who he calls the most balanced team in the country.
You guys need to compare your expert notes -
I think you are trying to down play the common opponent point. The link you posted was clearly stupid because Bama beat the holy hell out of Mississippi State. Mississippi State also didn't have Chad Kelly. I know you all will harp on USC changing QBs, but QBs don't play defense. They just couldn't stop Bama.AlCzervik said:
You missed the point.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Alabama&loser=Washington&year=2016&method=2AlCzervik said:
Probably the opposite of what USC did when they lost by 17 to a team UW beat 44-6. CHRIST.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Washington&loser=Alabama&year=2016&method=2
