Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Baird not impressed
Comments
-
It's passing efficiency nationally by year. It's not a perfect stat, but it's by far the best single metric you can use to compare quarterbacks.RoadDawg55 said:Boobs, what stat is that? Efficiency? And I don't care what the stats say, Tui was way better than Price. Do you really think we wouldn't have more wins with Tui instead of Price?
Here are some more numbers for those two side by side:
YPA: Price 7.4, Tui 7.2 - EVEN
TD/INT: Price 70/28 (in 1,094 passes), Tui 31/28 (in 761 passes) - HUGE edge for PRICE
Rushing: Price is a career zero, Tui was worth about 400 yards per year. - SMALL edge for TUI
If you switched Tui and Price, I think UW could still have won the 2001 Rose Bowl with Price and I know Sark goes 7-6 with Tui every year. Price is underrated because he plays for a shitty coach with a mediocre defense and bad special teams.
If you like Tui over Price, you're a fan of the stupid "signature wins" argument. Quarterbacks are important in college, by they can't lead teams to Rose Bowls by themselves. Just ask yourself what would have happened if Price and Mariota switched jerseys a few weeks ago. -
I don't think Price is the problem. Sark is the problem, followed by the lines. I will say, there's no way Price takes the 2000 team to the Rose Bowl.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's passing efficiency nationally by year. It's not a perfect stat, but it's by far the best single metric you can use to compare quarterbacks.RoadDawg55 said:Boobs, what stat is that? Efficiency? And I don't care what the stats say, Tui was way better than Price. Do you really think we wouldn't have more wins with Tui instead of Price?
Here are some more numbers for those two side by side:
YPA: Price 7.4, Tui 7.2 - EVEN
TD/INT: Price 70/28 (in 1,094 passes), Tui 31/28 (in 761 passes) - HUGE edge for PRICE
Rushing: Price is a career zero, Tui was worth about 400 yards per year. - SMALL edge for TUI
If you switched Tui and Price, I think UW could still have won the 2001 Rose Bowl with Price and I know Sark goes 7-6 with Tui every year. Price is underrated because he plays for a shitty coach with a mediocre defense and bad special teams.
If you like Tui over Price, you're a fan of the stupid "signature wins" argument. Quarterbacks are important in college, by they can't lead teams to Rose Bowls by themselves. Just ask yourself what would have happened if Price and Mariota switched jerseys a few weeks ago.
Here's why I think Price is an above average QB. If you switched him with Taylor Kelly or Kevin Hogan, I don't think we would be any worse, and those guys are average to above average QB's. With great teams around them, they can win, but they aren't anything special.
-
You have really been dooging it up lately with your Price bashing and Wilcox dick sucking.RoadDawg55 said:
The game has changed. QB's in general put up bigger numbers than they did in the past. Comparing QB's from today to guys from the 80's and 90's is not accurate. Price is an average to slightly above average QB. He's not as good as many of you on here think he is, and he's not as bad as doogs and Hugh think he is.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He's UW's all-time TD leader, passer rating, completion % and 2nd all-time in yards.Tequilla said:If Price's game isn't the deep throw, and we know he can't complete the intermediate throw, then what the fuck is his game?
Price's yardage total was because he was playing Cal, not because he was fucking sharp last night. A lot of his throws were late and/or under thrown - fortunately for him Cal's defense is THAT FUCKING BAD.
He's a good QB, wish some of you idiots would realize this. -
Completely disagree. If he was Stanford a team where he would actually have a pocket he would do well.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't think Price is the problem. Sark is the problem, followed by the lines. I will say, there's no way Price takes the 2000 team to the Rose Bowl.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's passing efficiency nationally by year. It's not a perfect stat, but it's by far the best single metric you can use to compare quarterbacks.RoadDawg55 said:Boobs, what stat is that? Efficiency? And I don't care what the stats say, Tui was way better than Price. Do you really think we wouldn't have more wins with Tui instead of Price?
Here are some more numbers for those two side by side:
YPA: Price 7.4, Tui 7.2 - EVEN
TD/INT: Price 70/28 (in 1,094 passes), Tui 31/28 (in 761 passes) - HUGE edge for PRICE
Rushing: Price is a career zero, Tui was worth about 400 yards per year. - SMALL edge for TUI
If you switched Tui and Price, I think UW could still have won the 2001 Rose Bowl with Price and I know Sark goes 7-6 with Tui every year. Price is underrated because he plays for a shitty coach with a mediocre defense and bad special teams.
If you like Tui over Price, you're a fan of the stupid "signature wins" argument. Quarterbacks are important in college, by they can't lead teams to Rose Bowls by themselves. Just ask yourself what would have happened if Price and Mariota switched jerseys a few weeks ago.
Here's why I think Price is an above average QB. If you switched him with Taylor Kelly or Kevin Hogan, I don't think we would be any worse, and those guys are average to above average QB's. With great teams around them, they can win, but they aren't anything special.
When has Price ever made a bad throw or bad play when he actually has time? Guy is always running for his life.
Also his WR's have been nothing special compared to other UW WR's. I would take Stevens over anyone that Price has ever played with. Stevens despite his drunken behavior and raping Co-Eds was an actual great pass catching TE unlike ASJ.
Huard also had a better WR in Pathon/Coleman. Pickett had Reggie/Frederick. Price had one year of Kearse, basically only one year of Kasen.
His stats speak for themselves. He's not average or "slightly" above average at all. -
Vince Young says ... Hook'em.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's passing efficiency nationally by year. It's not a perfect stat, but it's by far the best single metric you can use to compare quarterbacks.RoadDawg55 said:Boobs, what stat is that? Efficiency? And I don't care what the stats say, Tui was way better than Price. Do you really think we wouldn't have more wins with Tui instead of Price?
Here are some more numbers for those two side by side:
YPA: Price 7.4, Tui 7.2 - EVEN
TD/INT: Price 70/28 (in 1,094 passes), Tui 31/28 (in 761 passes) - HUGE edge for PRICE
Rushing: Price is a career zero, Tui was worth about 400 yards per year. - SMALL edge for TUI
If you switched Tui and Price, I think UW could still have won the 2001 Rose Bowl with Price and I know Sark goes 7-6 with Tui every year. Price is underrated because he plays for a shitty coach with a mediocre defense and bad special teams.
If you like Tui over Price, you're a fan of the stupid "signature wins" argument. Quarterbacks are important in college, by they can't lead teams to Rose Bowls by themselves. Just ask yourself what would have happened if Price and Mariota switched jerseys a few weeks ago.
-
Vince Young was terrific but those recruiting classes were ranked in the top 5 every year leading up to that. It's fucking Texas, they have talent every year.topdawgnc said:
Vince Young says ... Hook'em.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's passing efficiency nationally by year. It's not a perfect stat, but it's by far the best single metric you can use to compare quarterbacks.RoadDawg55 said:Boobs, what stat is that? Efficiency? And I don't care what the stats say, Tui was way better than Price. Do you really think we wouldn't have more wins with Tui instead of Price?
Here are some more numbers for those two side by side:
YPA: Price 7.4, Tui 7.2 - EVEN
TD/INT: Price 70/28 (in 1,094 passes), Tui 31/28 (in 761 passes) - HUGE edge for PRICE
Rushing: Price is a career zero, Tui was worth about 400 yards per year. - SMALL edge for TUI
If you switched Tui and Price, I think UW could still have won the 2001 Rose Bowl with Price and I know Sark goes 7-6 with Tui every year. Price is underrated because he plays for a shitty coach with a mediocre defense and bad special teams.
If you like Tui over Price, you're a fan of the stupid "signature wins" argument. Quarterbacks are important in college, by they can't lead teams to Rose Bowls by themselves. Just ask yourself what would have happened if Price and Mariota switched jerseys a few weeks ago. -
And have done what since he left?He_Needs_More_Time said:
Vince Young was terrific but those recruiting classes were ranked in the top 5 every year leading up to that. It's fucking Texas, they have talent every year.topdawgnc said:
Vince Young says ... Hook'em.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's passing efficiency nationally by year. It's not a perfect stat, but it's by far the best single metric you can use to compare quarterbacks.RoadDawg55 said:Boobs, what stat is that? Efficiency? And I don't care what the stats say, Tui was way better than Price. Do you really think we wouldn't have more wins with Tui instead of Price?
Here are some more numbers for those two side by side:
YPA: Price 7.4, Tui 7.2 - EVEN
TD/INT: Price 70/28 (in 1,094 passes), Tui 31/28 (in 761 passes) - HUGE edge for PRICE
Rushing: Price is a career zero, Tui was worth about 400 yards per year. - SMALL edge for TUI
If you switched Tui and Price, I think UW could still have won the 2001 Rose Bowl with Price and I know Sark goes 7-6 with Tui every year. Price is underrated because he plays for a shitty coach with a mediocre defense and bad special teams.
If you like Tui over Price, you're a fan of the stupid "signature wins" argument. Quarterbacks are important in college, by they can't lead teams to Rose Bowls by themselves. Just ask yourself what would have happened if Price and Mariota switched jerseys a few weeks ago. -
Mack Brown isn't a good coach. Although with Colt McCoy they were pretty good too.topdawgnc said:
And have done what since he left?He_Needs_More_Time said:
Vince Young was terrific but those recruiting classes were ranked in the top 5 every year leading up to that. It's fucking Texas, they have talent every year.topdawgnc said:
Vince Young says ... Hook'em.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's passing efficiency nationally by year. It's not a perfect stat, but it's by far the best single metric you can use to compare quarterbacks.RoadDawg55 said:Boobs, what stat is that? Efficiency? And I don't care what the stats say, Tui was way better than Price. Do you really think we wouldn't have more wins with Tui instead of Price?
Here are some more numbers for those two side by side:
YPA: Price 7.4, Tui 7.2 - EVEN
TD/INT: Price 70/28 (in 1,094 passes), Tui 31/28 (in 761 passes) - HUGE edge for PRICE
Rushing: Price is a career zero, Tui was worth about 400 yards per year. - SMALL edge for TUI
If you switched Tui and Price, I think UW could still have won the 2001 Rose Bowl with Price and I know Sark goes 7-6 with Tui every year. Price is underrated because he plays for a shitty coach with a mediocre defense and bad special teams.
If you like Tui over Price, you're a fan of the stupid "signature wins" argument. Quarterbacks are important in college, by they can't lead teams to Rose Bowls by themselves. Just ask yourself what would have happened if Price and Mariota switched jerseys a few weeks ago. -
Mack Brown is a good coach, he is not great.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Mack Brown isn't a good coach. Although with Colt McCoy they were pretty good too.topdawgnc said:
And have done what since he left?He_Needs_More_Time said:
Vince Young was terrific but those recruiting classes were ranked in the top 5 every year leading up to that. It's fucking Texas, they have talent every year.topdawgnc said:
Vince Young says ... Hook'em.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's passing efficiency nationally by year. It's not a perfect stat, but it's by far the best single metric you can use to compare quarterbacks.RoadDawg55 said:Boobs, what stat is that? Efficiency? And I don't care what the stats say, Tui was way better than Price. Do you really think we wouldn't have more wins with Tui instead of Price?
Here are some more numbers for those two side by side:
YPA: Price 7.4, Tui 7.2 - EVEN
TD/INT: Price 70/28 (in 1,094 passes), Tui 31/28 (in 761 passes) - HUGE edge for PRICE
Rushing: Price is a career zero, Tui was worth about 400 yards per year. - SMALL edge for TUI
If you switched Tui and Price, I think UW could still have won the 2001 Rose Bowl with Price and I know Sark goes 7-6 with Tui every year. Price is underrated because he plays for a shitty coach with a mediocre defense and bad special teams.
If you like Tui over Price, you're a fan of the stupid "signature wins" argument. Quarterbacks are important in college, by they can't lead teams to Rose Bowls by themselves. Just ask yourself what would have happened if Price and Mariota switched jerseys a few weeks ago.
He is the Peyton Manning of coaches.
And yes ... Colt was good. I contend ... without Vince Young ... Texas is not playing in that Rose Bowl ... -
Wilcox's D has fallen off some, but I think it has more to do with Seven than Wilcox. He's a good (not great yet) DC. Price played bad against Oregon and even worse against ASU. Once again, he's not the problem, but it is what it is. I think he's the 4th through 6th best QB in the league, which is an above average QB. That's not really bashing.He_Needs_More_Time said:
You have really been dooging it up lately with your Price bashing and Wilcox dick sucking.RoadDawg55 said:
The game has changed. QB's in general put up bigger numbers than they did in the past. Comparing QB's from today to guys from the 80's and 90's is not accurate. Price is an average to slightly above average QB. He's not as good as many of you on here think he is, and he's not as bad as doogs and Hugh think he is.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He's UW's all-time TD leader, passer rating, completion % and 2nd all-time in yards.Tequilla said:If Price's game isn't the deep throw, and we know he can't complete the intermediate throw, then what the fuck is his game?
Price's yardage total was because he was playing Cal, not because he was fucking sharp last night. A lot of his throws were late and/or under thrown - fortunately for him Cal's defense is THAT FUCKING BAD.
He's a good QB, wish some of you idiots would realize this.
It's not dooging. I hate Sark just as much as you guys. I just don't buy that Keith Price is a great QB. Sark is a fucking idiot AND our lines suck AND Price is not a great QB. Abundance mothafucka.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
