Official Wk 1 Playoff Rankings Game Thread
Comments
-
Right, don't win out and it doesn't matter at all.dhdawg said:
not really. we know this all dependent on if UW wins out and accept that there is at the very least a 30% chance of that not happeningUWhuskytskeet said:
I didn't think it would matter before tonight, but yeah that concerns me now. Really though, there are four teams ahead of us and each plays at least four more games, three likely will play five. That's around 20 games and all we need is one of them to be a loss and we won't sweat a drop.RoadDawg55 said:ATM isn't good and will lose again. I'm a little worried about what happens if Ohio State beats Michigan in a close game. Alabama, Clemson go undefeated. Ohio State and Michigan with one loss. That's the nightmare scenario.
This thread is going to look so retarded if we lose a game. -
not unless Louisville, Ohio State, and A&M all take another lossUWhuskytskeet said:
Right, don't win out and it doesn't matter at all.dhdawg said:
not really. we know this all dependent on if UW wins out and accept that there is at the very least a 30% chance of that not happeningUWhuskytskeet said:
I didn't think it would matter before tonight, but yeah that concerns me now. Really though, there are four teams ahead of us and each plays at least four more games, three likely will play five. That's around 20 games and all we need is one of them to be a loss and we won't sweat a drop.RoadDawg55 said:ATM isn't good and will lose again. I'm a little worried about what happens if Ohio State beats Michigan in a close game. Alabama, Clemson go undefeated. Ohio State and Michigan with one loss. That's the nightmare scenario.
This thread is going to look so retarded if we lose a game.
-
This changes nothing.. We all knew that a 1 loss Washington wasn't getting into the playoffs. WIN out and we are in. This just helps us. The players Will NOT be overlooking Cal this week after getting bitch slapped in the rankings. I for one will tip my hat and say "Thank you" to the committee. They about to butt fuck Cal then shove a Marshawn Lynch bobble head up the crack for good measure.
-
Spooge: will you try crossing the border to attend the bowl game?Ice_Holmvik said:This changes nothing.. We all knew that a 1 loss Washington wasn't getting into the playoffs. WIN out and we are in. This just helps us. The players Will NOT be overlooking Cal this week after getting bitch slapped in the rankings. I for one will tip my hat and say "Thank you" to the committee. They about to butt fuck Cal then shove a Marshawn Lynch bobble head up the crack for good measure.
-
Holy fuck.OZONE said:
LOL from the guy who probably didn't even graduate from Bellevue CC, where the majority of Husky fans matriculated.haie said:Two wannabe trolls: one whose real college is so low they play high school football and the other whose team lost to an fcs school for a 2nd straight year and is literally killing their NFL quarterback to stay in the same conversation as Washington.
BTW, I also have a degree from the UW, but my college football fan association was set in Oregon before I moved to Seattle.
-
the most likely spot for a loss is USC or the Pac-12 title game. The cougs are garbage, and falk will dead by that game. Stadium default if UW losesTequilla said:There's still a lot of football to be played ... we honestly don't know about a 1 loss Washington because there's a lot of moving parts to that ...
The biggest reason though to question a 1 loss Washington though is that one of its most likely opportunities for a loss is at the Cougs ... if we lose that game the reason we're disqualified is because we won't win the Conference ... not because we have a loss. -
You're on the wrong site, fucktard.salemcoog said:
You'll see,dhdawg said:
CPOTD!salemcoog said:
And you needed a late punt return to beat what will be a 7-5 Utah team as well.GreenRiverGatorz said:
And we needed OT to beat a 2-6 Arizona team. Not sure that's the argument you want to make.backthepack said:Lol they needed OT at home to beat Tenn and UCLA nuff said
A&M getting buttfucked by 19 points against Bama is what should disqualify them, regardless of where they finish the season. Unless the Aggies can win out and Bama somehow loses two games, they don't deserve to even sniff the playoffs.
But Doogs hate facts so I understand the outrage. -
It'd be 144 ... (0-12)^2 = -12^2 = 144OZONE said:
I haven't had so solve a partial differential equation in a while, but would that be like...salemcoog said:
0-12 squared.CuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.
0 - 144?
#MathSuperiorityGuy -
I'm not 100% sure I agree ...dhdawg said:
the most likely spot for a loss is USC or the Pac-12 title game. The cougs are garbage, and falk will dead by that game. Stadium default if UW losesTequilla said:There's still a lot of football to be played ... we honestly don't know about a 1 loss Washington because there's a lot of moving parts to that ...
The biggest reason though to question a 1 loss Washington though is that one of its most likely opportunities for a loss is at the Cougs ... if we lose that game the reason we're disqualified is because we won't win the Conference ... not because we have a loss.
There was a part of me that was really worried about how much Cal could score leading into this game before the announcement tonight ... it was possible that we could have come in flat ... doubt that will be the case now ... too many guys on our team love to play with chips on their shoulder ... they've now got their chip.
The SC game is one of the few games left I feel relatively confident about. The stadium is going to be jacked if we're 9-0. We haven't had a noteworthy game there in 6 weeks or thereabouts. Still starting a young QB on the road. He handled the pressure ok at Utah ... but what's the environment at Utah (spoiler alert ... not great). Outside of that, who has USC played on the road since then? Arizona. Everybody else (ASU, Colorado, Cal, and Oregon) will have been at home ... there's nothing to prepare young QBs for being in the fire of road games like being in them. Browning had his fair share of "moments" last year in those situations (beat Oregon St and USC ... lost to Arizona St and Boise). Physically USC is the closest competition in the conference ... and there's also no question that they are talented. Our ability to stop their run game will be paramount as their recent success has been predicated on running all over overmatched teams and then exploiting them in the passing game. They've shown a recent propensity to not respond well when punched in the mouth ... we'll be the first team able to do that against them since September when Stanford and Utah did so ... and both beat them.
I was definitely worried about ASU before the season ... but they are a disaster.
And honestly, the way the Cougs play matches up literally perfectly for what we do ... bring that game on. -
See yaOZONE said:
LOL from the guy who probably didn't even graduate from Bellevue CC, where the majority of Husky fans matriculated.haie said:Two wannabe trolls: one whose real college is so low they play high school football and the other whose team lost to an fcs school for a 2nd straight year and is literally killing their NFL quarterback to stay in the same conversation as Washington.
BTW, I also have a degree from the UW, but my college football fan association was set in Oregon before I moved to Seattle. -
USC is the only team with talent even comparable to what we have. That's what scares me. Yeah Helton is a joke and their qb is a freshman but it's also possible guys like Jackson and smoth-schustrr go off.Tequilla said:
I'm not 100% sure I agree ...dhdawg said:
the most likely spot for a loss is USC or the Pac-12 title game. The cougs are garbage, and falk will dead by that game. Stadium default if UW losesTequilla said:There's still a lot of football to be played ... we honestly don't know about a 1 loss Washington because there's a lot of moving parts to that ...
The biggest reason though to question a 1 loss Washington though is that one of its most likely opportunities for a loss is at the Cougs ... if we lose that game the reason we're disqualified is because we won't win the Conference ... not because we have a loss.
There was a part of me that was really worried about how much Cal could score leading into this game before the announcement tonight ... it was possible that we could have come in flat ... doubt that will be the case now ... too many guys on our team love to play with chips on their shoulder ... they've now got their chip.
The SC game is one of the few games left I feel relatively confident about. The stadium is going to be jacked if we're 9-0. We haven't had a noteworthy game there in 6 weeks or thereabouts. Still starting a young QB on the road. He handled the pressure ok at Utah ... but what's the environment at Utah (spoiler alert ... not great). Outside of that, who has USC played on the road since then? Arizona. Everybody else (ASU, Colorado, Cal, and Oregon) will have been at home ... there's nothing to prepare young QBs for being in the fire of road games like being in them. Browning had his fair share of "moments" last year in those situations (beat Oregon St and USC ... lost to Arizona St and Boise). Physically USC is the closest competition in the conference ... and there's also no question that they are talented. Our ability to stop their run game will be paramount as their recent success has been predicated on running all over overmatched teams and then exploiting them in the passing game. They've shown a recent propensity to not respond well when punched in the mouth ... we'll be the first team able to do that against them since September when Stanford and Utah did so ... and both beat them.
I was definitely worried about ASU before the season ... but they are a disaster.
And honestly, the way the Cougs play matches up literally perfectly for what we do ... bring that game on.
The Cal game I feel like will either resemble Oregon or Arizona. It's worth noting that kwiatkowski's defense whether it be wsu or Cal has been exceptional since he got here against air raid type offenses. After this today I think it's even more likely UW brings out the plunger, something like 50-20 -
That's bullshit.DerekJohnson said:Willingham in theory could have the Huskies ranked 12th or 14th, and no one on the committee would have the courage to challenge him. And he knows it.
-
That's the joke.OZONE said:The really funny part, and some might say ironic, is that one of the reasons you guys were so shitty for the last 15 years, is because you hired a guy that is now on that selection committee. ROFL.
Besides the one in @backthepack's jeans that is. -
It's always special when a Dawgman Diehard wanders off the reservation.Dawgs4ever said:
You're on the wrong site, fucktard.salemcoog said:
You'll see,dhdawg said:
CPOTD!salemcoog said:
And you needed a late punt return to beat what will be a 7-5 Utah team as well.GreenRiverGatorz said:
And we needed OT to beat a 2-6 Arizona team. Not sure that's the argument you want to make.backthepack said:Lol they needed OT at home to beat Tenn and UCLA nuff said
A&M getting buttfucked by 19 points against Bama is what should disqualify them, regardless of where they finish the season. Unless the Aggies can win out and Bama somehow loses two games, they don't deserve to even sniff the playoffs.
But Doogs hate facts so I understand the outrage.
Word to the wise IF Kim sees you posting on here... He's sure to boot you out of the citrus chatroom.
No warning.
Just gone. -
Bahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaha awww that's cute...salemcoog said:
That's the joke.OZONE said:The really funny part, and some might say ironic, is that one of the reasons you guys were so shitty for the last 15 years, is because you hired a guy that is now on that selection committee. ROFL.
Besides the one in @backthepack's jeans that is. -
shameless self-quoterodmansrage said:gonna be super interested to see how dark sark does with being ranked 4th now, ton of pressure.
im guessing he'll have it dialed in.
lmao
#darksark -
It's funny because Doogs panic over shit that doesn't matter for four more weeks.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SEC faggots. Fuck the committee. Fuck ESPN. Fuck CBS. Why is this possibly funny?
-
This thread is a black eye for HH.
-
True, but ESPN's headline online was, "Washington can thank Mississippi State for the help."TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's funny because Doogs panic over shit that doesn't matter for four more weeks.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SEC faggots. Fuck the committee. Fuck ESPN. Fuck CBS. Why is this possibly funny?
The next headline is Petrino whining about being #7. -
CHRISTRoadDawg55 said:
True, but ESPN's headline online was, "Washington can thank Mississippi State for the help."TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's funny because Doogs panic over shit that doesn't matter for four more weeks.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SEC faggots. Fuck the committee. Fuck ESPN. Fuck CBS. Why is this possibly funny?
The next headline is Petrino whining about being #7.