Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Official Wk 1 Playoff Rankings Game Thread

1…567810

Comments

  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    dhdawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ATM isn't good and will lose again. I'm a little worried about what happens if Ohio State beats Michigan in a close game. Alabama, Clemson go undefeated. Ohio State and Michigan with one loss. That's the nightmare scenario.

    I didn't think it would matter before tonight, but yeah that concerns me now. Really though, there are four teams ahead of us and each plays at least four more games, three likely will play five. That's around 20 games and all we need is one of them to be a loss and we won't sweat a drop.

    This thread is going to look so retarded if we lose a game.
    not really. we know this all dependent on if UW wins out and accept that there is at the very least a 30% chance of that not happening
    Right, don't win out and it doesn't matter at all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    dhdawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ATM isn't good and will lose again. I'm a little worried about what happens if Ohio State beats Michigan in a close game. Alabama, Clemson go undefeated. Ohio State and Michigan with one loss. That's the nightmare scenario.

    I didn't think it would matter before tonight, but yeah that concerns me now. Really though, there are four teams ahead of us and each plays at least four more games, three likely will play five. That's around 20 games and all we need is one of them to be a loss and we won't sweat a drop.

    This thread is going to look so retarded if we lose a game.
    not really. we know this all dependent on if UW wins out and accept that there is at the very least a 30% chance of that not happening
    Right, don't win out and it doesn't matter at all.
    not unless Louisville, Ohio State, and A&M all take another loss
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ice_Holmvik
    Ice_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912
    This changes nothing.. We all knew that a 1 loss Washington wasn't getting into the playoffs. WIN out and we are in. This just helps us. The players Will NOT be overlooking Cal this week after getting bitch slapped in the rankings. I for one will tip my hat and say "Thank you" to the committee. They about to butt fuck Cal then shove a Marshawn Lynch bobble head up the crack for good measure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Tequilla said:

    There's still a lot of football to be played ... we honestly don't know about a 1 loss Washington because there's a lot of moving parts to that ...

    The biggest reason though to question a 1 loss Washington though is that one of its most likely opportunities for a loss is at the Cougs ... if we lose that game the reason we're disqualified is because we won't win the Conference ... not because we have a loss.

    the most likely spot for a loss is USC or the Pac-12 title game. The cougs are garbage, and falk will dead by that game. Stadium default if UW loses
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dawgs4ever
    Dawgs4ever Member Posts: 170
    salemcoog said:

    dhdawg said:

    salemcoog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    backthepack said:

    Lol they needed OT at home to beat Tenn and UCLA nuff said

    And we needed OT to beat a 2-6 Arizona team. Not sure that's the argument you want to make.

    A&M getting buttfucked by 19 points against Bama is what should disqualify them, regardless of where they finish the season. Unless the Aggies can win out and Bama somehow loses two games, they don't deserve to even sniff the playoffs.
    And you needed a late punt return to beat what will be a 7-5 Utah team as well.
    CPOTD!

    You'll see,


    But Doogs hate facts so I understand the outrage.
    You're on the wrong site, fucktard.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,231
    OZONE said:

    salemcoog said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    0-12 squared.
    I haven't had so solve a partial differential equation in a while, but would that be like...

    0 - 144?
    It'd be 144 ... (0-12)^2 = -12^2 = 144

    #MathSuperiorityGuy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,231
    dhdawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    There's still a lot of football to be played ... we honestly don't know about a 1 loss Washington because there's a lot of moving parts to that ...

    The biggest reason though to question a 1 loss Washington though is that one of its most likely opportunities for a loss is at the Cougs ... if we lose that game the reason we're disqualified is because we won't win the Conference ... not because we have a loss.

    the most likely spot for a loss is USC or the Pac-12 title game. The cougs are garbage, and falk will dead by that game. Stadium default if UW loses
    I'm not 100% sure I agree ...

    There was a part of me that was really worried about how much Cal could score leading into this game before the announcement tonight ... it was possible that we could have come in flat ... doubt that will be the case now ... too many guys on our team love to play with chips on their shoulder ... they've now got their chip.

    The SC game is one of the few games left I feel relatively confident about. The stadium is going to be jacked if we're 9-0. We haven't had a noteworthy game there in 6 weeks or thereabouts. Still starting a young QB on the road. He handled the pressure ok at Utah ... but what's the environment at Utah (spoiler alert ... not great). Outside of that, who has USC played on the road since then? Arizona. Everybody else (ASU, Colorado, Cal, and Oregon) will have been at home ... there's nothing to prepare young QBs for being in the fire of road games like being in them. Browning had his fair share of "moments" last year in those situations (beat Oregon St and USC ... lost to Arizona St and Boise). Physically USC is the closest competition in the conference ... and there's also no question that they are talented. Our ability to stop their run game will be paramount as their recent success has been predicated on running all over overmatched teams and then exploiting them in the passing game. They've shown a recent propensity to not respond well when punched in the mouth ... we'll be the first team able to do that against them since September when Stanford and Utah did so ... and both beat them.

    I was definitely worried about ASU before the season ... but they are a disaster.

    And honestly, the way the Cougs play matches up literally perfectly for what we do ... bring that game on.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter