Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Official Wk 1 Playoff Rankings Game Thread

1…5681011

Comments

  • digits
    digits Member Posts: 1,848
    OZONE said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    aTm
    Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rodmansrage
    rodmansrage Member Posts: 6,427
    gonna be super interested to see how dark sark does with being ranked 4th now, ton of pressure.

    im guessing he'll have it dialed in.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    digits said:

    If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'

    If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dongman
    dongman Member Posts: 2,384
    CuntWaffle said:

    digits said:

    If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'

    If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.
    If they don't, I will bring my band of cuogs to team up and burn down the cfbp board and melt their servers.

    That would be beating Utah, cal, USC, ASU, WSU, Utah/Colorado down the stretch. 4/6 top 25 teams down the stretch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    CuntWaffle said:

    digits said:

    If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'

    If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.
    that much has been clear. to get in with 1 loss UW would have to win the conference, A&M would have to take another, so would Louisville, and Michigan would have to beat Ohio State. even then it's still not a given.
    in other words, UW probably needs to go 13-0
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    the good news in these rankings (as a quook actually pointed out to me) is it shows that the committee has no interest in the Big-12 this year
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    salemcoog said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    0-12 squared.
    Your shit talking has stooped to a coogfan level of dogshit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    digits said:

    OZONE said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    aTm
    Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.
    That is funny, coming from a fanbase that is so butthurt over today's rankings.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    OZONE said:

    digits said:

    OZONE said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    aTm
    Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.
    That is funny, coming from a fanbase that is so butthurt over today's rankings.
    A few heavy keyboard mouth breathers define the fanbase now?

    Old dawgs who watched CFB pre-94 know it's awfully warm for November 1.

    5th is fine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter