Official Wk 1 Playoff Rankings Game Thread
Comments
-
I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years. -
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years. -
aTmCuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years. -
If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'
-
because A&M has been a real powerhouse lately...OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.
-
You lost to Boise and EWU stfu until you guys can become the 2nd best team in the PNWsalemcoog said:
You'll see,dhdawg said:
CPOTD!salemcoog said:
And you needed a late punt return to beat what will be a 7-5 Utah team as well.GreenRiverGatorz said:
And we needed OT to beat a 2-6 Arizona team. Not sure that's the argument you want to make.backthepack said:Lol they needed OT at home to beat Tenn and UCLA nuff said
A&M getting buttfucked by 19 points against Bama is what should disqualify them, regardless of where they finish the season. Unless the Aggies can win out and Bama somehow loses two games, they don't deserve to even sniff the playoffs.
But Doogs hate facts so I understand the outrage. -
0-12 squared.CuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years. -
I haven't had so solve a partial differential equation in a while, but would that be like...salemcoog said:
0-12 squared.CuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.
0 - 144? -
salemcoog said:
0-12 squared.CuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.
PSU says hi!salemcoog said:
0-12 squared.CuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.
GO CUOGS -
The really funny part, and some might say ironic, is that one of the reasons you guys were so shitty for the last 15 years, is because you hired a guy that is now on that selection committee. ROFL.
-
Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.OZONE said:
aTmCuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years. -
gonna be super interested to see how dark sark does with being ranked 4th now, ton of pressure.
im guessing he'll have it dialed in. -
If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.digits said:If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'
-
If they don't, I will bring my band of cuogs to team up and burn down the cfbp board and melt their servers.CuntWaffle said:
If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.digits said:If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'
That would be beating Utah, cal, USC, ASU, WSU, Utah/Colorado down the stretch. 4/6 top 25 teams down the stretch.
-
that much has been clear. to get in with 1 loss UW would have to win the conference, A&M would have to take another, so would Louisville, and Michigan would have to beat Ohio State. even then it's still not a given.CuntWaffle said:
If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.digits said:If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'
in other words, UW probably needs to go 13-0 -
the good news in these rankings (as a quook actually pointed out to me) is it shows that the committee has no interest in the Big-12 this year
-
Your shit talking has stooped to a coogfan level of dogshit.salemcoog said:
0-12 squared.CuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years. -
Worth repeating:salemcoog said:
0-12 squared.CuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.
-
That is funny, coming from a fanbase that is so butthurt over today's rankings.digits said:
Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.OZONE said:
aTmCuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years. -
A few heavy keyboard mouth breathers define the fanbase now?OZONE said:
That is funny, coming from a fanbase that is so butthurt over today's rankings.digits said:
Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.OZONE said:
aTmCuntWaffle said:
70OZONE said:I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.
You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.
Old dawgs who watched CFB pre-94 know it's awfully warm for November 1.
5th is fine. -
Two wannabe trolls: one whose real college is so low they play high school football and the other whose team lost to an fcs school for a 2nd straight year and is literally killing their NFL quarterback to stay in the same conversation as Washington.
lol you fucking losers. -
Willingham in theory could have the Huskies ranked 12th or 14th, and no one on the committee would have the courage to challenge him. And he knows it.
-
Barry Alvarez would.DerekJohnson said:Willingham in theory could have the Huskies ranked 12th or 14th, and no one on the committee would have the courage to challenge him. And he knows it.
-
LOL from the guy who probably didn't even graduate from Bellevue CC, where the majority of Husky fans matriculated.haie said:Two wannabe trolls: one whose real college is so low they play high school football and the other whose team lost to an fcs school for a 2nd straight year and is literally killing their NFL quarterback to stay in the same conversation as Washington.
BTW, I also have a degree from the UW, but my college football fan association was set in Oregon before I moved to Seattle. -
70-21 nuff said fuck off Ducky.OZONE said:
LOL from the guy who probably didn't even graduate from Bellevue CC, where the majority of Husky fans matriculated.haie said:Two wannabe trolls: one whose real college is so low they play high school football and the other whose team lost to an fcs school for a 2nd straight year and is literally killing their NFL quarterback to stay in the same conversation as Washington.
BTW, I also have a degree from the UW, but my college football fan association was set in Oregon before I moved to Seattle. -
@OZONE has reached He_Needs_More_Cock territory in this thread.
-
ATM isn't good and will lose again. I'm a little worried about what happens if Ohio State beats Michigan in a close game. Alabama, Clemson go undefeated. Ohio State and Michigan with one loss. That's the nightmare scenario.
-
I can't see a michigan team that loses their division without a great SOS getting in over an undefeated UWRoadDawg55 said:ATM isn't good and will lose again. I'm a little worried about what happens if Ohio State beats Michigan in a close game. Alabama, Clemson go undefeated. Ohio State and Michigan with one loss. That's the nightmare scenario.
-
I didn't think it would matter before tonight, but yeah that concerns me now. Really though, there are four teams ahead of us and each plays at least four more games, three likely will play five. That's around 20 games and all we need is one of them to be a loss and we won't sweat a drop.RoadDawg55 said:ATM isn't good and will lose again. I'm a little worried about what happens if Ohio State beats Michigan in a close game. Alabama, Clemson go undefeated. Ohio State and Michigan with one loss. That's the nightmare scenario.
This thread is going to look so retarded if we lose a game. -
not really. we know this all dependent on if UW wins out and accept that there is at the very least a 30% chance of that not happeningUWhuskytskeet said:
I didn't think it would matter before tonight, but yeah that concerns me now. Really though, there are four teams ahead of us and each plays at least four more games, three likely will play five. That's around 20 games and all we need is one of them to be a loss and we won't sweat a drop.RoadDawg55 said:ATM isn't good and will lose again. I'm a little worried about what happens if Ohio State beats Michigan in a close game. Alabama, Clemson go undefeated. Ohio State and Michigan with one loss. That's the nightmare scenario.
This thread is going to look so retarded if we lose a game.
