Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Official Wk 1 Playoff Rankings Game Thread

1246

Comments

  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    aTm
  • digitsdigits Member Posts: 1,470
    If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,839
    salemcoog said:

    dhdawg said:

    salemcoog said:

    Lol they needed OT at home to beat Tenn and UCLA nuff said

    And we needed OT to beat a 2-6 Arizona team. Not sure that's the argument you want to make.

    A&M getting buttfucked by 19 points against Bama is what should disqualify them, regardless of where they finish the season. Unless the Aggies can win out and Bama somehow loses two games, they don't deserve to even sniff the playoffs.
    And you needed a late punt return to beat what will be a 7-5 Utah team as well.
    CPOTD!

    You'll see,


    But Doogs hate facts so I understand the outrage.
    You lost to Boise and EWU stfu until you guys can become the 2nd best team in the PNW
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,846

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    0-12 squared.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    salemcoog said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    0-12 squared.
    I haven't had so solve a partial differential equation in a while, but would that be like...

    0 - 144?
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,839
    salemcoog said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    0-12 squared.
    salemcoog said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    0-12 squared.
    PSU says hi!
    GO CUOGS
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    The really funny part, and some might say ironic, is that one of the reasons you guys were so shitty for the last 15 years, is because you hired a guy that is now on that selection committee. ROFL.
  • digitsdigits Member Posts: 1,470
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    aTm
    Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.
  • rodmansragerodmansrage Member Posts: 6,171
    gonna be super interested to see how dark sark does with being ranked 4th now, ton of pressure.

    im guessing he'll have it dialed in.
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,493
    digits said:

    If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'

    If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.
  • dongmandongman Member Posts: 2,384

    digits said:

    If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'

    If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.
    If they don't, I will bring my band of cuogs to team up and burn down the cfbp board and melt their servers.

    That would be beating Utah, cal, USC, ASU, WSU, Utah/Colorado down the stretch. 4/6 top 25 teams down the stretch.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    digits said:

    If I'm Petersen, I'd be thinking, 'Fuck. One of the main reasons I left Boise was so I didn't have to go undefeated every year in order to get into the playoff and win a NC. Now I'm back to square one. I really fuct myself going to the Larry Scott_FS PAC12.'

    If UW goes undefeated they will be in the playoff.
    that much has been clear. to get in with 1 loss UW would have to win the conference, A&M would have to take another, so would Louisville, and Michigan would have to beat Ohio State. even then it's still not a given.
    in other words, UW probably needs to go 13-0
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    the good news in these rankings (as a quook actually pointed out to me) is it shows that the committee has no interest in the Big-12 this year
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,163
    salemcoog said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    0-12 squared.
    Your shit talking has stooped to a coogfan level of dogshit.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    digits said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    aTm
    Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.
    That is funny, coming from a fanbase that is so butthurt over today's rankings.
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    OZONE said:

    digits said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    I just have one thing to say. If Oregon or Stanford had played the same schedule as you guys, and were undefeated, Oregon or Stanford would be in the top 4.

    You guys have a ways to go still in terms of earning respect. This isn't the Pac 12's fault, this is your fault for being so shitty for the last 15 years.

    70
    aTm
    Sure, one could equate dropping 70 on a team as 'ass to mouth' (ATM). You bet.
    That is funny, coming from a fanbase that is so butthurt over today's rankings.
    A few heavy keyboard mouth breathers define the fanbase now?

    Old dawgs who watched CFB pre-94 know it's awfully warm for November 1.

    5th is fine.
Sign In or Register to comment.