Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

New Fish / Why the mediocre rush defense through 7 games?

2

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,313 Founders Club

    I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.

    You the same person?

    I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag.

    Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,313 Founders Club

    I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.

    You the same person?

    I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag.

    Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.
    It would surprise me.
    General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.

    You the same person?

    I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag.

    Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.
    It would surprise me.
    General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.
    thoseguysarefags.gif
    This was shot at their last signing day event.

    image
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,683 Swaye's Wigwam
    I'll spell this out just this once for you new fish: shut your stupid cunt mouth.

    Then leave.

    The numbers are what they are and there's no taking away plays...but take away the big qb runs and the fly sweep td in garbage time and I bet *we* rank pretty high. I think the run D will show well at Utah.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839

    Swaye said:

    I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.

    You the same person?

    I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag.

    Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.
    It would surprise me.
    General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.
    thoseguysarefags.gif
    This was shot at their last signing day event.

    image
    Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!
    Backhair
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194

    Swaye said:

    I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.

    You the same person?

    I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag.

    Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.
    It would surprise me.
    General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.
    thoseguysarefags.gif
    This was shot at their last signing day event.

    image
    Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!
    Considering those are all white guys, I'm guessing you're not in the photo
    Look again on the left edge
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Our backups suck which means we're not back yet.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419

    Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.

    Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html

    In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html

    /thread
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,398
    Stopping the run will be Kawasaki's #1 priority. We'll see more 3-4 and less 2-4-5...glad that Potoa'e is also in the mix for Mathis' snaps since he's a more physical option than O'Brien.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.

    Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html

    In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html

    This is certainly a large part of it but Alabama is still first in the nation by a big margin allowing just 2.2 ypc despite blowing many opponents out early (and against much better offenses than UW has faced.)

  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.

    Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html

    In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html

    This is certainly a large part of it but Alabama is still first in the nation by a big margin allowing just 2.2 ypc despite blowing many opponents out early (and against much better offenses than UW has faced.)

    Is there someone here who needs to be convinced?

    By the looks of it, there's a pretty good gap between Bama and anybody else. I'd be surprised to see anyone really challenge them this year. In fact, I think anyone they play is going to get their shit pushed in.
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    dflea said:

    Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.

    Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html

    In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html

    This is certainly a large part of it but Alabama is still first in the nation by a big margin allowing just 2.2 ypc despite blowing many opponents out early (and against much better offenses than UW has faced.)

    Is there someone here who needs to be convinced?

    By the looks of it, there's a pretty good gap between Bama and anybody else. I'd be surprised to see anyone really challenge them this year. In fact, I think anyone they play is going to get their shit pushed in.
    SEC is just as bad as the pac 12... All the conferences are dreck this year... So top heavy.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    dflea said:

    Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.

    Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html

    In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html

    This is certainly a large part of it but Alabama is still first in the nation by a big margin allowing just 2.2 ypc despite blowing many opponents out early (and against much better offenses than UW has faced.)

    Is there someone here who needs to be convinced?

    By the looks of it, there's a pretty good gap between Bama and anybody else. I'd be surprised to see anyone really challenge them this year. In fact, I think anyone they play is going to get their shit pushed in.
    SEC is just as bad as the pac 12... All the conferences are dreck this year... So top heavy.
    I was talking about Bama, not the SEC.
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,554 Swaye's Wigwam

    Swaye said:

    I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.

    You the same person?

    I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag.

    Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.
    It would surprise me.
    General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.
    thoseguysarefags.gif
    This was shot at their last signing day event.

    image
    Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!
    The dude with his clothes still on in the daisy chain???
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    Swaye said:

    I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.

    You the same person?

    I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag.

    Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.
    It would surprise me.
    General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.
    thoseguysarefags.gif
    This was shot at their last signing day event.

    image
    Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!
    None of them. They can all stand.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.

    Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.

    We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,313 Founders Club

    doogie said:

    Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.

    Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.

    We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays.
    Nice bored selection Splitskin. Keep your politicking to the Tug.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    doogie said:

    Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.

    Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.

    We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays.
    Nice bored selection Splitskin. Keep your politicking to the Tug.
    Hit the bricks newfishe
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,313 Founders Club

    doogie said:

    Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.

    Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.

    We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays.
    Nice bored selection Splitskin. Keep your politicking to the Tug.
    Hit the bricks newfishe
    #21stmostpopularpoaster
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,313 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    I mean kudos for at least showing up with an avatar, which means you might be salvageable, but name dropping Race in the hopes that I wouldn't crawl into your ass for the next week was pathetic. Kill yourself.




  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    Swaye said:

    I mean kudos for at least showing up with an avatar, which means you might be salvageable, but name dropping Race in the hopes that I wouldn't crawl into your ass for the next week was pathetic. Kill yourself.




    Wow, your first post. This is sort of special. Also a blue print for how new fuckers can assimilate here if they have heart and balls. I just Nebraska classied you back Big Cat.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,313 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    Swaye said:

    I mean kudos for at least showing up with an avatar, which means you might be salvageable, but name dropping Race in the hopes that I wouldn't crawl into your ass for the next week was pathetic. Kill yourself.




    Wow, your first post. This is sort of special. Also a blue print for how new fuckers can assimilate here if they have heart and balls. I just Nebraska classied you back Big Cat.
    I got @FirePete breaking my balls over getting scalped. He and need to take a walk along the banks of the Little Bighorn River for perspective and a swift kick in the nuts.