New Fish / Why the mediocre rush defense through 7 games?
Comments
-
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag.
-
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
This was shot at their last signing day event.Dennis_DeYoung said:
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
Fuck off. This guy actually brings something to the table and seems to have this place dialed in. You just puke all over every thread trying to fit in by dropping references you saw for the first time when you found this place after the Stanford game.backthepack said:
I literally said scrubs... You don't need to write a paragraph to reason why our run defense has been statisically "average"YellowSnow said:
So to @Tequilla 's point about separate stats for garbage it does seem like our run defense in the 1st half of the 3 PAC blowouts has been stout. Stanford had 16 net rushing yards in the 1st half, 13 in the 2nd. Oregon ran for 73 net in the 1st half and 157 in the 2nd. OSU was 33 and 144 respectively. I guess it’s fair to say then Arizona and garbage time rushing yards given up are dragging down our numbers a bit. Ok – I feel about bit better now. I just hope we can put Utah away but halftime or early in the 3rd.
@YellowSnow can stay, you should LEAVE!
-
I'll spell this out just this once for you new fish: shut your stupid cunt mouth.
Then leave.
The numbers are what they are and there's no taking away plays...but take away the big qb runs and the fly sweep td in garbage time and I bet *we* rank pretty high. I think the run D will show well at Utah. -
Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!Swaye said:
This was shot at their last signing day event.Dennis_DeYoung said:
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
Considering those are all white guys, I'm guessing you're not in the photoDennis_DeYoung said:
Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!Swaye said:
This was shot at their last signing day event.Dennis_DeYoung said:
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.
Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html
In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html -
BackhairDennis_DeYoung said:
Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!Swaye said:
This was shot at their last signing day event.Dennis_DeYoung said:
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
Look again on the left edgeCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Considering those are all white guys, I'm guessing you're not in the photoDennis_DeYoung said:
Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!Swaye said:
This was shot at their last signing day event.Dennis_DeYoung said:
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
So that guy is bringing heat from the edge. In that case, @Dennis_DeYoung must be providing the push up the middle.Mad_Son said:
Look again on the left edgeCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Considering those are all white guys, I'm guessing you're not in the photoDennis_DeYoung said:
Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!Swaye said:
This was shot at their last signing day event.Dennis_DeYoung said:
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
Our backups suck which means we're not back yet.
-
Since Utah is in Canada, don't we have to play by CFL rules? 4 could = field goal + a single. Or a safety + 2 singles. Or four singles...dnc said: -
/threadHuskyClaws said:Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.
Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html
In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html -
Stopping the run will be Kawasaki's #1 priority. We'll see more 3-4 and less 2-4-5...glad that Potoa'e is also in the mix for Mathis' snaps since he's a more physical option than O'Brien.
-
This is certainly a large part of it but Alabama is still first in the nation by a big margin allowing just 2.2 ypc despite blowing many opponents out early (and against much better offenses than UW has faced.)HuskyClaws said:Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.
Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html
In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html
-
Is there someone here who needs to be convinced?FremontTroll said:
This is certainly a large part of it but Alabama is still first in the nation by a big margin allowing just 2.2 ypc despite blowing many opponents out early (and against much better offenses than UW has faced.)HuskyClaws said:Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.
Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html
In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html
By the looks of it, there's a pretty good gap between Bama and anybody else. I'd be surprised to see anyone really challenge them this year. In fact, I think anyone they play is going to get their shit pushed in. -
SEC is just as bad as the pac 12... All the conferences are dreck this year... So top heavy.dflea said:
Is there someone here who needs to be convinced?FremontTroll said:
This is certainly a large part of it but Alabama is still first in the nation by a big margin allowing just 2.2 ypc despite blowing many opponents out early (and against much better offenses than UW has faced.)HuskyClaws said:Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.
Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html
In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html
By the looks of it, there's a pretty good gap between Bama and anybody else. I'd be surprised to see anyone really challenge them this year. In fact, I think anyone they play is going to get their shit pushed in. -
I was talking about Bama, not the SEC.backthepack said:
SEC is just as bad as the pac 12... All the conferences are dreck this year... So top heavy.dflea said:
Is there someone here who needs to be convinced?FremontTroll said:
This is certainly a large part of it but Alabama is still first in the nation by a big margin allowing just 2.2 ypc despite blowing many opponents out early (and against much better offenses than UW has faced.)HuskyClaws said:Pretty simple. We dominate the 1st half, then have backups in the 2nd half while our opponents typically keep in their 1st string.
Just going by 1st half stats, we hold opponents to 2.77 ypc, which is 10th in the county http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational02/category01/sort02.html
In the 2nd half, we surrender 4.68 ypc, good for 89th in the country http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/leader/national/team/defense/situational03/category01/sort02.html
By the looks of it, there's a pretty good gap between Bama and anybody else. I'd be surprised to see anyone really challenge them this year. In fact, I think anyone they play is going to get their shit pushed in. -
The dude with his clothes still on in the daisy chain???Dennis_DeYoung said:
Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!Swaye said:
This was shot at their last signing day event.Dennis_DeYoung said:
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
None of them. They can all stand.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Guess which one is me and I'll give you $20!Swaye said:
This was shot at their last signing day event.Dennis_DeYoung said:
thoseguysarefags.gifYellowSnow said:
General lack of creativity over there or something? I only know the cliff notes version of how this place got started as an alternative to that site.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It would surprise me.YellowSnow said:
Nope, not me. I think I probably had a total of 4 or 5 five posts on dawgman years ago under a different handle. Wouldn't surprise me though if someone had the same inspiration and used it on dawgman.Dennis_DeYoung said:I think there was a dawgman poster by the name of YellowSnow. I can't remember but I think he was a fag.
You the same person?
I'm not brave enough to use my dawgman handle because I'm a fag. -
Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.doogie said:Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.
We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays. -
Nice bored selection Splitskin. Keep your politicking to the Tug.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.doogie said:Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.
We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays. -
Hit the bricks newfisheYellowSnow said:
Nice bored selection Splitskin. Keep your politicking to the Tug.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.doogie said:Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.
We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays. -
#21stmostpopularpoasterGrundleStiltzkin said:
Hit the bricks newfisheYellowSnow said:
Nice bored selection Splitskin. Keep your politicking to the Tug.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.doogie said:Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.
We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays. -
Swaye said:
I mean kudos for at least showing up with an avatar, which means you might be salvageable, but name dropping Race in the hopes that I wouldn't crawl into your ass for the next week was pathetic. Kill yourself.
-
Wow, your first post. This is sort of special. Also a blue print for how new fuckers can assimilate here if they have heart and balls. I just Nebraska classied you back Big Cat.YellowSnow said:Swaye said:I mean kudos for at least showing up with an avatar, which means you might be salvageable, but name dropping Race in the hopes that I wouldn't crawl into your ass for the next week was pathetic. Kill yourself.
-
I got @FirePete breaking my balls over getting scalped. He and need to take a walk along the banks of the Little Bighorn River for perspective and a swift kick in the nuts.Swaye said:
Wow, your first post. This is sort of special. Also a blue print for how new fuckers can assimilate here if they have heart and balls. I just Nebraska classied you back Big Cat.YellowSnow said:Swaye said:I mean kudos for at least showing up with an avatar, which means you might be salvageable, but name dropping Race in the hopes that I wouldn't crawl into your ass for the next week was pathetic. Kill yourself.