How bad is Tevis Bartlett...
Comments
-
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
-
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did! -
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team. -
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff but then getting ass fucked by quick QBsBallSacked said:
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
HTH -
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBsBallSacked said:
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
HTH
-
At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?BallSacked said:
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBsBallSacked said:
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
HTH -
Hi! I'm in real estatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?BallSacked said:
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBsBallSacked said:
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
HTH
I own property in your, J, and Races head.
-
Being Stanford's favorite concubine, when will you change your avatar? Get going.BallSacked said:
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBsBallSacked said:
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
HTH -
Illegals arent in real estate, even in your fucktarded state.BallSacked said:
Hi! I'm in real estatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?BallSacked said:
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBsBallSacked said:
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
HTH
I own property in your, J, and Races head.
Weve already gone over this. Youre the dipshit with 3k posts on an opponents message board. It seems like you care. -
Don't worry about it.Gladstone said:
Being Stanford's favorite concubine, when will you change your avatar? Get going.BallSacked said:
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBsBallSacked said:
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.Quietcowskee said:I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
HTH
-
I thought the same thing, but I don't think he has confidence in DD's catching ability.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Jake blew it a lot last night. He looked like crap and made tons of mistakes.
He threw a crap pass to Dante (should've gone to DD who had no one covering him) and Pettis bailed him out.
Still, he gets credit. So, in the end he made a play that I respect.
But, if he didn't Brownsocks every time we got the ball up by 7, we would've put the game away in the 3rd.
So, there's a ways to go. Jury is still out. He's still Brownsocks until he takes the ball with us up by a score and puts us up by 2 scores and nails the coffin shut on a shit team like AZ. -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
Jake blew it a lot last night. He looked like crap and made tons of mistakes.
He threw a crap pass to Dante (should've gone to DD who had no one covering him) and Pettis bailed him out.
Still, he gets credit. So, in the end he made a play that I respect.
But, if he didn't Brownsocks every time we got the ball up by 7, we would've put the game away in the 3rd.
So, there's a ways to go. Jury is still out. He's still Brownsocks until he takes the ball with us up by a score and puts us up by 2 scores and nails the coffin shut on a shit team like AZ.
Irrelevant. At least now he maybe thinks he can make that play or any play. -
@AIRWOLF is on record as predicting Brandon Wellington to pass Psalm by midseason.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
In this case it's actually right.Gladstone said:
First page from the doog playbook quote right there.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disgree.whatshouldicareabout said:
Disagree.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
They ran his side all game and he couldn't stop it.
Puppy is to football analysis as Psalm is to football.
Arizona ran right up the gut on us and Victor, Bierria, and Baker didnt have great gap penetration.
Psalm rarely lost contain.
However he did miss some crucial tackles, but the rest of the defense took horrible pursuit angles afterwards.
All in all a shitty effort on defense that I think will be a wake up call for them. If anyone else was better than Psalm they would be starting. But they arent.
So youre saying there is someone better that should be starting. Who? Why arent they?
He does look damn studly coming off the bus. And on kickoff returns. -
Generally when a QB hits a WR that is standing still right in the hands from 10 yards away with a rifled pass it is safe to assume he hit his intended target. Generally.Passion said:
Browning will never be "a loser and suck." But that doesn't mean he's a winner either. Still needs to prove that. Last year's games against asu, oregon and cal prove he is not yet a winner. Yes, Pettis caught his pass, but was it intended for him?CuntWaffle said:
He threw a go ahead TD on 3rd down after Arizona had all the momentum on late game miracles on the road... But still.Passion said:Hate? Dude, you're reaching.
My position on Jake is shared by a lot of others here. I love his work ethic.
But he collapsed against asu and didn't pull through against oregon and cal. As Nigel Burton said on the pac-12 post game wrap up: "We need to start a new show, 'keeping it real with Jake Browning.' His team would've never been in that situation if he'd made plays."
He had numerous chances. Until he proves an ability to deliver in tough games in clutch situations, then he is not a winner.
Quit being a lovesick fan. You obviously have certain man-crushes (not there's anything wrong with that).
(By the way, I love how the token ucla fan agrees with you. Talk about an underperforming program.)
I have been on the record many times saying that it's LIPO with Browning. He might end up being a loser and suck but there's also a chance he could be pretty good
He had an OK game last night. He missed some critical throws but he made the one that mattered the most. That throw still doesn't prove shit though.
Right now he is a hard worker with a steady outwardly demeanor and good elusiveness that usually throws an accurate ball. All good traits. -
I'd accept 25 to life to see Wellington take Lilo and Stitch's spot next week.
Death by Ukulele. -
"Enough of this shit! I'm a fire twirler you assholes!"
-
Heat from the edge?
-
CuntWaffle said:
They have played 1 game. Do you think the staff really learned anything playing that shitshow OOC schedule?Passion said:
I mentioned that we played 4 games.CuntWaffle said:
Camp and practice is not the same as real game experience. If you don't know that you are retarded.Passion said:
As the year progresses? This team just went through spring practice and summer camp. We've played 4 games. We play stanford next week and the the quacks.CuntWaffle said:
Tevis is in his 2nd year. Almost every player has gotten better under this coaching staff. Maybe if you actually LIPO then he will beat out Psalm as the year progresses.Passion said:
A suggestion for you - go back to where you belong: www.dawgman.comCuntWaffle said:Almost as bad as most of your poasts.
This bored is for honest discussion.
I think it's been "playing out" for a little while.
Camp and practice is critically important. It's how coaches determine depth charts. It's how they determine who starts and who doesn't.
If you don't know that you're retarded.
Browning for example, every time he makes a bad pass you start some stupid thread about how he sucks and is a loser. Yet you defended Keith Price while he continually shit his pants.
#whynotboth
-
Barlett might never see the field again unless in a blowout. O'Brien was a beast on Friday too.
I'm a negadawg, but when O'Brien and Wooching get 5 combined sacks in a game, it's hard not to get on board.
We do dumb, pussy shit on offense sometimes. Other than that, it's hard to complain about anything. -
Bartlett should start next year, which is how it should be. If Petersen has this team running like a machine, there will be no room for 1st and 2nd year players as starters unless they are truly elite.RoadDawg55 said:Barlett might never see the field again unless in a blowout. O'Brien was a beast on Friday too.
I'm a negadawg, but when O'Brien and Wooching get 5 combined sacks in a game, it's hard not to get on board.
We do dumb, pussy shit on offense sometimes. Other than that, it's hard to complain about anything.
1st year: get your feet wet on special teams.
2nd year: backup minutes
3rd year: push for starting spot
We've become so accustomed to seeing guys thrown stright into the fire in this program, we quickly write a guy off if he's not playing right away -
#MyTevis had several series Friday.
-
To clean up the sawdust from the starters devouring the Tree.GrundleStiltzkin said:#MyTevis had several series Friday.
-
Not my best work.FremontTroll said:
@AIRWOLF is on record as predicting Brandon Wellington to pass Psalm by midseason.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
In this case it's actually right.Gladstone said:
First page from the doog playbook quote right there.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disgree.whatshouldicareabout said:
Disagree.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
They ran his side all game and he couldn't stop it.
Puppy is to football analysis as Psalm is to football.
Arizona ran right up the gut on us and Victor, Bierria, and Baker didnt have great gap penetration.
Psalm rarely lost contain.
However he did miss some crucial tackles, but the rest of the defense took horrible pursuit angles afterwards.
All in all a shitty effort on defense that I think will be a wake up call for them. If anyone else was better than Psalm they would be starting. But they arent.
So youre saying there is someone better that should be starting. Who? Why arent they?
He does look damn studly coming off the bus. And on kickoff returns. -
He was in on Stanford's second drive. So yeah, he'll be fine.GrundleStiltzkin said:#MyTevis had several series Friday.
-
-----Dennis_DeYoung said:
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
----BallSacked said:
Holy fuck you're a doog.
---Dennis_DeYoung said:
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Really great insight here by @BallSacked!BallSacked said:
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team. -
Does Sterk get any playing time? I thought he would be better than Tevis
-
