I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
Disagree.
They ran his side all game and he couldn't stop it.
Puppy is to football analysis as Psalm is to football.
Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
Disagree.
They ran his side all game and he couldn't stop it.
Puppy is to football analysis as Psalm is to football.
Disgree.
Arizona ran right up the gut on us and Victor, Bierria, and Baker didnt have great gap penetration.
Psalm rarely lost contain.
However he did miss some crucial tackles, but the rest of the defense took horrible pursuit angles afterwards.
All in all a shitty effort on defense that I think will be a wake up call for them. If anyone else was better than Psalm they would be starting. But they arent.
My position on Jake is shared by a lot of others here. I love his work ethic.
But he collapsed against asu and didn't pull through against oregon and cal. As Nigel Burton said on the pac-12 post game wrap up: "We need to start a new show, 'keeping it real with Jake Browning.' His team would've never been in that situation if he'd made plays."
He had numerous chances. Until he proves an ability to deliver in tough games in clutch situations, then he is not a winner.
Quit being a lovesick fan. You obviously have certain man-crushes (not there's anything wrong with that).
(By the way, I love how the token ucla fan agrees with you. Talk about an underperforming program.)
He threw a go ahead TD on 3rd down after Arizona had all the momentum on late game miracles on the road... But still.
I have been on the record many times saying that it's LIPO with Browning. He might end up being a loser and suck but there's also a chance he could be pretty good
He had an OK game last night. He missed some critical throws but he made the one that mattered the most. That throw still doesn't prove shit though.
Browning will never be "a loser and suck." But that doesn't mean he's a winner either. Still needs to prove that. Last year's games against asu, oregon and cal prove he is not yet a winner. Yes, Pettis caught his pass, but was it intended for him?
Right now he is a hard worker with a steady outwardly demeanor and good elusiveness that usually throws an accurate ball. All good traits.
Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
Disagree.
They ran his side all game and he couldn't stop it.
Puppy is to football analysis as Psalm is to football.
Disgree.
Arizona ran right up the gut on us and Victor, Bierria, and Baker didnt have great gap penetration.
Psalm rarely lost contain.
However he did miss some crucial tackles, but the rest of the defense took horrible pursuit angles afterwards.
All in all a shitty effort on defense that I think will be a wake up call for them. If anyone else was better than Psalm they would be starting. But they arent.
First page from the doog playbook quote right there.
Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
Disagree.
They ran his side all game and he couldn't stop it.
Puppy is to football analysis as Psalm is to football.
Disgree.
Arizona ran right up the gut on us and Victor, Bierria, and Baker didnt have great gap penetration.
Psalm rarely lost contain.
However he did miss some crucial tackles, but the rest of the defense took horrible pursuit angles afterwards.
All in all a shitty effort on defense that I think will be a wake up call for them. If anyone else was better than Psalm they would be starting. But they arent.
First page from the doog playbook quote right there.
In this case it's actually right.
So youre saying there is someone better that should be starting. Who? Why arent they?
Wooching is fucking terrible. It's good to be getting Jaylen J back; he will be needed against the Tree. Baked Potato could have a major role too, if he steps up and starts playing with purpose.
Whooching is playing well. Told you buttfucks last year when ya'll said he should be suddenly seniored. Told you he's the starter get used to it. Sucks puppy is always right. Mathis stepping up too. Sometimes I wonder if you guys are watching the same game. Bunch a tardo's is how I see it.
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff but then getting ass fucked by quick QBs
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs
HTH
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs
HTH
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs
HTH
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs
HTH
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
Being Stanford's favorite concubine, when will you change your avatar? Get going.
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs
HTH
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?
Hi! I'm in real estate
I own property in your, J, and Races head.
Illegals arent in real estate, even in your fucktarded state.
Weve already gone over this. Youre the dipshit with 3k posts on an opponents message board. It seems like you care.
I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest." Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.
We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
Holy fuck you're a doog.
Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs
HTH
Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
Being Stanford's favorite concubine, when will you change your avatar? Get going.
Comments
However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
They ran his side all game and he couldn't stop it.
Puppy is to football analysis as Psalm is to football.
Arizona ran right up the gut on us and Victor, Bierria, and Baker didnt have great gap penetration.
Psalm rarely lost contain.
However he did miss some crucial tackles, but the rest of the defense took horrible pursuit angles afterwards.
All in all a shitty effort on defense that I think will be a wake up call for them. If anyone else was better than Psalm they would be starting. But they arent.
Right now he is a hard worker with a steady outwardly demeanor and good elusiveness that usually throws an accurate ball. All good traits.
So youre saying there is someone better that should be starting. Who? Why arent they?
I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
HTH
I own property in your, J, and Races head.
Weve already gone over this. Youre the dipshit with 3k posts on an opponents message board. It seems like you care.