Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How bad is Tevis Bartlett...

1246

Comments

  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.

    I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
    Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.

    Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 28,009
    edited September 2016
    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.

    I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
    Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.

    Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
    We have a history of playing Stanford tuff but then getting ass fucked by quick QBs

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.

    I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
    Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.

    Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
    We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs

    HTH
    Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 28,009
    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.

    I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
    Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.

    Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
    We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs

    HTH
    Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
    At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.

    I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
    Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.

    Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
    We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs

    HTH
    Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
    At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?
    Hi! I'm in real estate

    I own property in your, J, and Races head.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.

    I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
    Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.

    Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
    We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs

    HTH
    Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
    Being Stanford's favorite concubine, when will you change your avatar? Get going.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 28,009
    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.

    I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
    Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.

    Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
    We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs

    HTH
    Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
    At least i put my opinions out there for all to critique. What is it you do again?
    Hi! I'm in real estate

    I own property in your, J, and Races head.
    Illegals arent in real estate, even in your fucktarded state.

    Weve already gone over this. Youre the dipshit with 3k posts on an opponents message board. It seems like you care.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Gladstone said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    BallSacked said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Quietcowskee said:

    I wasn't too impressed with the Stanford QBing last night. Just a lot of slow moving, predictable beef and not much "keeping the d honest."
    Sounds quite suited to QuaVeGaines.

    We match up like shit against AZ and way better against Stanford. This week is a totally new week, totally different set of circumstances and a totally different challenge.

    However, we have beat good teams at home as an undefeated in the past 10 years. So, I doubt we will have the same loser ball fuckbrain bullshit we did @ Zona.
    Holy fuck you're a doog.
    Great job by your boys in crunch time last night! That's that UCLA toughness shining through.

    I wish they could give wins for leading most of the game. You guys would surely have a Natty more recently than '54 if they did!
    Thanks! We gave you a preview for your DAWGS next week.

    Agree that Brandon Dawkins is such a TUFF matchup. You'll matchup better with a top10 team.
    We have a history of playing Stanford tuff and the getting ass fucked by quick QBs

    HTH
    Sounds legit. Kind of like your UW/Cal ANALysis last year.
    Being Stanford's favorite concubine, when will you change your avatar? Get going.
    Don't worry about it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter