Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Elon Musk is a fraud...

24

Comments

  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Elon Musk creates cool shit.

    It's too bad he has to steal from people to do so.
    You mean like all of the military contractors creating weapons that the Military doesn't want? Are those military contractors every paying us back?
    OZONE. Pressing badly. Every thread.
    If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.
    Way to not get it as usual.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Elon Musk creates cool shit.

    It's too bad he has to steal from people to do so.
    You mean like all of the military contractors creating weapons that the Military doesn't want? Are those military contractors every paying us back?
    OZONE. Pressing badly. Every thread.
    If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.
    Way to not get it as usual.
    The main thing "to get" about your posts are that 90% of them are nothing more than cycling through old cliches from Race Bannon.
  • Alexis
    Alexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,385 Founders Club
    I always thought Elon Musk was a cologne.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    And Freeme is voting for Gary Johnson.

    "lol"

    And J is voting Trump

    el oh el

    tee hee
    Huh? It's week one dude.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Elon Musk creates cool shit.

    It's too bad he has to steal from people to do so.
    You mean like all of the military contractors creating weapons that the Military doesn't want? Are those military contractors every paying us back?
    OZONE. Pressing badly. Every thread.
    If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.
    Way to not get it as usual.
    The main thing "to get" about your posts are that 90% of them are nothing more than cycling through old cliches from Race Bannon.
    Seems like you care
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    Sounds like he has a lot in common with Trump.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Elon Musk creates cool shit.

    It's too bad he has to steal from people to do so.
    You mean like all of the military contractors creating weapons that the Military doesn't want? Are those military contractors every paying us back?
    OZONE. Pressing badly. Every thread.
    If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.
    Way to not get it as usual.
    The main thing "to get" about your posts are that 90% of them are nothing more than cycling through old cliches from Race Bannon.
    Seems like you care
    At least you change things up a bit, since Race tends to use the "Sounds like you care" more than the "seems like you care", but I think maybe he and his minions (you) finally released the "sounds like" doesn't make a lot of sense on a message board.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Elon Musk creates cool shit.

    It's too bad he has to steal from people to do so.
    You mean like all of the military contractors creating weapons that the Military doesn't want? Are those military contractors every paying us back?
    OZONE. Pressing badly. Every thread.
    If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.
    Way to not get it as usual.
    The main thing "to get" about your posts are that 90% of them are nothing more than cycling through old cliches from Race Bannon.
    Seems like you care
    At least you change things up a bit, since Race tends to use the "Sounds like you care" more than the "seems like you care", but I think maybe he and his minions (you) finally released the "sounds like" doesn't make a lot of sense on a message board.
    Christ
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,759 Founders Club
    Ozone gives me credit for every saying just like the fucknig doogs did at dawgman

    I think you'd fit in there O
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited September 2016

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,759 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    money.cnn.com/2016/05/04/news/companies/tesla-earnings/

    Not only was it morally wrong for them to take money that didn't belong to them in the first place and lend it without permission, it didn't work.

    I have a better solution for resource scarcity. People like ballbag, hondo and OZONE should kill themselves. With AR-15s. Make the world a better place.
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,759 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Shouldn't efficiency drive investment decisions instead of political contributions to gain interest rates/terms favorable to the political donor?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.

    Not to mention his point was FS to begin with.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,759 Founders Club
    doogie said:

    Shouldn't efficiency drive investment decisions instead of political contributions to gain interest rates/terms favorable to the political donor?

    Yes but as I pointed out, ballfag doesn't get it.



    At all
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.

    Not to mention his point was FS to begin with.
    No. And thanks for reminding us once again, his salient point sailed right over your head.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.

    Not to mention his point was FS to begin with.
    No. And thanks for reminding us once again, his salient point sailed right over your head.
    Like Race,, all you got is the 2nd grade answer of. "No you are wrong. Cause I said so, that's why".
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    Ozone gives me credit for every saying

    Not every saying. Just the ones that have become worn out cliches used by your minions.

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    OZONE. Pressing badly. Every thread.
    And pressing harder. Every post.
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,759 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    *Sound
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited September 2016

    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
    You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,759 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
    You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?
    No. You're wrong


    And stupid
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
    You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?
    No. You're wrong


    And stupid
    Liar and a Failure. Really set the world on fire there, huh Race?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,759 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
    You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?
    No. You're wrong


    And stupid
    Liar and a Failure. Really set the world on fire there, huh Race?
    Yes I have as a matter of fact. Thank you for noticing