Elon Musk is a fraud...
Comments
-
Way to not get it as usual.OZONE said:
If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.CuntWaffle said: -
The main thing "to get" about your posts are that 90% of them are nothing more than cycling through old cliches from Race Bannon.CuntWaffle said:
Way to not get it as usual.OZONE said:
If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.CuntWaffle said: -
I always thought Elon Musk was a cologne.
-
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
-
Huh? It's week one dude.ThomasFremont said:
-
Seems like you careOZONE said:
The main thing "to get" about your posts are that 90% of them are nothing more than cycling through old cliches from Race Bannon.CuntWaffle said:
Way to not get it as usual.OZONE said:
If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.CuntWaffle said: -
Sounds like he has a lot in common with Trump.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS... -
At least you change things up a bit, since Race tends to use the "Sounds like you care" more than the "seems like you care", but I think maybe he and his minions (you) finally released the "sounds like" doesn't make a lot of sense on a message board.CuntWaffle said:
Seems like you careOZONE said:
The main thing "to get" about your posts are that 90% of them are nothing more than cycling through old cliches from Race Bannon.CuntWaffle said:
Way to not get it as usual.OZONE said:
If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.CuntWaffle said: -
ChristOZONE said:
At least you change things up a bit, since Race tends to use the "Sounds like you care" more than the "seems like you care", but I think maybe he and his minions (you) finally released the "sounds like" doesn't make a lot of sense on a message board.CuntWaffle said:
Seems like you careOZONE said:
The main thing "to get" about your posts are that 90% of them are nothing more than cycling through old cliches from Race Bannon.CuntWaffle said:
Way to not get it as usual.OZONE said:
If you think opening your eyes is pressing, then you probably also think Sark teams were known for were known for suffocating defenses.CuntWaffle said: -
Ozone gives me credit for every saying just like the fucknig doogs did at dawgman
I think you'd fit in there O -
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
-
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS... -
money.cnn.com/2016/05/04/news/companies/tesla-earnings/
Not only was it morally wrong for them to take money that didn't belong to them in the first place and lend it without permission, it didn't work.
I have a better solution for resource scarcity. People like ballbag, hondo and OZONE should kill themselves. With AR-15s. Make the world a better place. -
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
-
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC -
Shouldn't efficiency drive investment decisions instead of political contributions to gain interest rates/terms favorable to the political donor?
-
Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
Not to mention his point was FS to begin with. -
Yes but as I pointed out, ballfag doesn't get it.doogie said:Shouldn't efficiency drive investment decisions instead of political contributions to gain interest rates/terms favorable to the political donor?
At all -
No. And thanks for reminding us once again, his salient point sailed right over your head.2001400ex said:
Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
Not to mention his point was FS to begin with. -
Like Race,, all you got is the 2nd grade answer of. "No you are wrong. Cause I said so, that's why".doogie said:
No. And thanks for reminding us once again, his salient point sailed right over your head.2001400ex said:
Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
Not to mention his point was FS to begin with. -
Not every saying. Just the ones that have become worn out cliches used by your minions.RaceBannon said:Ozone gives me credit for every saying
-
OZONE. Pressing badly. Every thread.
And pressing harder. Every post. -
That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
-
You seem angry.BallSacked said:
That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
-
And stupidPurpleJ said:
You seem angry.BallSacked said:
That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag. -
*SoundPurpleJ said:
You seem angry.BallSacked said:
That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag. -
You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?RaceBannon said:
And stupidPurpleJ said:
You seem angry.BallSacked said:
That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
-
No. You're wrongBallSacked said:
You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?RaceBannon said:
And stupidPurpleJ said:
You seem angry.BallSacked said:
That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
And stupid -
Liar and a Failure. Really set the world on fire there, huh Race?RaceBannon said:
No. You're wrongBallSacked said:
You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?RaceBannon said:
And stupidPurpleJ said:
You seem angry.BallSacked said:
That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
And stupid
-
Yes I have as a matter of fact. Thank you for noticingBallSacked said:
Liar and a Failure. Really set the world on fire there, huh Race?RaceBannon said:
No. You're wrongBallSacked said:
You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?RaceBannon said:
And stupidPurpleJ said:
You seem angry.BallSacked said:
That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).RaceBannon said:
If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.BallSacked said:
Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.RaceBannon said:
How did that work out you powder blue faggot?BallSacked said:
The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.HoustonHusky said:
Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.2001400ex said:Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan
PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.
Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.
Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...
Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.
FS...
Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
And stupid