Melania ...

Trump must break them.

Comments
-
I didn't last 12 seconds.
Listening to her. But that's about how long I'd last full coitus too.
brb, jo. -
I'd hit it, but why is an immigrant with zero useful skills speaking for the GOP?
-
She's representing the gold digger faction of the party.TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'd hit it, but why is an immigrant with zero useful skills speaking for the GOP?
-
I see a US Citizen, who earned entry.
If you can't comprehend her skills, I think that says more about you -
Zero useful skills?TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'd hit it, but why is an immigrant with zero useful skills speaking for the GOP?
Are you fucking kidding me?
A piece of ass like that has all sorts of useful skills ...
If you didn't like cock you'd realize that. -
"earned entry" lolsarktastic said:I see a US Citizen, who earned entry.
If you can't comprehend her skills, I think that says more about you -
Those skills serve one micropenis.topdawgnc said:
Zero useful skills?TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'd hit it, but why is an immigrant with zero useful skills speaking for the GOP?
Are you fucking kidding me?
A piece of ass like that has all sorts of useful skills ...
If you didn't like cock you'd realize that. -
Toppy thought Palin was HAWT too.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Those skills serve one micropenis.topdawgnc said:
Zero useful skills?TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'd hit it, but why is an immigrant with zero useful skills speaking for the GOP?
Are you fucking kidding me?
A piece of ass like that has all sorts of useful skills ...
If you didn't like cock you'd realize that. -
So did IThomasFremont said:
Toppy thought Palin was HAWT too.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Those skills serve one micropenis.topdawgnc said:
Zero useful skills?TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'd hit it, but why is an immigrant with zero useful skills speaking for the GOP?
Are you fucking kidding me?
A piece of ass like that has all sorts of useful skills ...
If you didn't like cock you'd realize that. -
Pics or gtfo
-
My apologies. It appears Melania is excellent at plagiarism shit:
http://gawker.com/melania-trump-apparently-plagiarized-a-section-of-miche-1783889522 -
What's strange is that the parts that are being cited for plagiarizing are words that I would say you could hear in similar discussions on this type of topic.TierbsHsotBoobs said:My apologies. It appears Melania is excellent at plagiarism shit:
http://gawker.com/melania-trump-apparently-plagiarized-a-section-of-miche-1783889522
Another thing that I've learned over the years is that depending on where you are in the world, the topic of plagiarism, stretching the truth, etc. is completely different than our standards.
I also think a lot of times people view plagiarism as full blown source stealing whereas this would clearly be at best a couple of lines that are very, very generic. -
"Very generic" my asshole, one part was 22 out of 26 words exactly the same in exactly the same place. Obvious plagiarismTequilla said:
What's strange is that the parts that are being cited for plagiarizing are words that I would say you could hear in similar discussions on this type of topic.TierbsHsotBoobs said:My apologies. It appears Melania is excellent at plagiarism shit:
http://gawker.com/melania-trump-apparently-plagiarized-a-section-of-miche-1783889522
Another thing that I've learned over the years is that depending on where you are in the world, the topic of plagiarism, stretching the truth, etc. is completely different than our standards.
I also think a lot of times people view plagiarism as full blown source stealing whereas this would clearly be at best a couple of lines that are very, very generic. -
It's word for fucking word.Tequilla said:
What's strange is that the parts that are being cited for plagiarizing are words that I would say you could hear in similar discussions on this type of topic.TierbsHsotBoobs said:My apologies. It appears Melania is excellent at plagiarism shit:
http://gawker.com/melania-trump-apparently-plagiarized-a-section-of-miche-1783889522
Another thing that I've learned over the years is that depending on where you are in the world, the topic of plagiarism, stretching the truth, etc. is completely different than our standards.
I also think a lot of times people view plagiarism as full blown source stealing whereas this would clearly be at best a couple of lines that are very, very generic.
CNN and MSNBC are blowing this shit up right now. -
-
Has anyone really ever given a shit what the First Lady, or presumptive First Lady says?
I stopped listening 20 seconds in - and just checked out her tits, mouth, and ass for the remainder of the time.
-
Trump wins the headline war again.
-
When your campaign is centered on attacking the credibility of a former First Lady, it helps if your prospective First Lady doesn't shit the bed.dflea said:Has anyone really ever given a shit what the First Lady, or presumptive First Lady says?
I stopped listening 20 seconds in - and just checked out her tits, mouth, and ass for the remainder of the time. -
So prospective is the word, huh?
I'm pretty buzzed up and took a swing with presumptive.
Did she shit the bed? Like I said - 20 seconds, -
I think either word worksdflea said:So prospective is the word, huh?
I'm pretty buzzed up and took a swing with presumptive.
Did she shit the bed? Like I said - 20 seconds, -
NOC. The left will blow this insignificant tidbit completely out of proportion to take the lens off the primary topic of the evening. -
Isn't credibility a big deal in this election?Southerndawg said:
NOC. The left will blow this insignificant tidbit completely out of proportion to take the lens off the primary topic of the evening.
Or are we moving the goalposts again?
Most importantly, it's never good when Michelle Obama is the star of the RNC so far. -
Completely missing the markTierbsHsotBoobs said:
When your campaign is centered on attacking the credibility of a former First Lady, it helps if your prospective First Lady doesn't shit the bed.dflea said:Has anyone really ever given a shit what the First Lady, or presumptive First Lady says?
I stopped listening 20 seconds in - and just checked out her tits, mouth, and ass for the remainder of the time. -
So you think it's good that Melania wants to be Michelle?Tequilla said:
Completely missing the markTierbsHsotBoobs said:
When your campaign is centered on attacking the credibility of a former First Lady, it helps if your prospective First Lady doesn't shit the bed.dflea said:Has anyone really ever given a shit what the First Lady, or presumptive First Lady says?
I stopped listening 20 seconds in - and just checked out her tits, mouth, and ass for the remainder of the time. -
Seriously? She gave an innocuous speech that had some elements that appear to have been edited extractions from the Grinch's speech eight years ago. So what? At least she didn't say it was the first time in her life that she was proud of her country.
I think you need to continue watching your CNN and MSNBC feeds for more talking points. -
When you're talking about very generic things about how you grew up, your values, etc. there's a lot of these comments that would be very similar from person to person.Peterman said:
"Very generic" my asshole, one part was 22 out of 26 words exactly the same in exactly the same place. Obvious plagiarismTequilla said:
What's strange is that the parts that are being cited for plagiarizing are words that I would say you could hear in similar discussions on this type of topic.TierbsHsotBoobs said:My apologies. It appears Melania is excellent at plagiarism shit:
http://gawker.com/melania-trump-apparently-plagiarized-a-section-of-miche-1783889522
Another thing that I've learned over the years is that depending on where you are in the world, the topic of plagiarism, stretching the truth, etc. is completely different than our standards.
I also think a lot of times people view plagiarism as full blown source stealing whereas this would clearly be at best a couple of lines that are very, very generic.
I'm sure that there are things any of us have said in the past that could be cited for plagiarism. I know personally, I've said things that people have claimed I've taken straight from somebody else and I've never even seen what those people have said. -
Watch the side by side speeches Doog.Tequilla said:
When you're talking about very generic things about how you grew up, your values, etc. there's a lot of these comments that would be very similar from person to person.Peterman said:
"Very generic" my asshole, one part was 22 out of 26 words exactly the same in exactly the same place. Obvious plagiarismTequilla said:
What's strange is that the parts that are being cited for plagiarizing are words that I would say you could hear in similar discussions on this type of topic.TierbsHsotBoobs said:My apologies. It appears Melania is excellent at plagiarism shit:
http://gawker.com/melania-trump-apparently-plagiarized-a-section-of-miche-1783889522
Another thing that I've learned over the years is that depending on where you are in the world, the topic of plagiarism, stretching the truth, etc. is completely different than our standards.
I also think a lot of times people view plagiarism as full blown source stealing whereas this would clearly be at best a couple of lines that are very, very generic.
I'm sure that there are things any of us have said in the past that could be cited for plagiarism. I know personally, I've said things that people have claimed I've taken straight from somebody else and I've never even seen what those people have said. -
Oh my fucking god. Tequillasplaining 101.Tequilla said:
What's strange is that the parts that are being cited for plagiarizing are words that I would say you could hear in similar discussions on this type of topic.TierbsHsotBoobs said:My apologies. It appears Melania is excellent at plagiarism shit:
http://gawker.com/melania-trump-apparently-plagiarized-a-section-of-miche-1783889522
Another thing that I've learned over the years is that depending on where you are in the world, the topic of plagiarism, stretching the truth, etc. is completely different than our standards.
I also think a lot of times people view plagiarism as full blown source stealing whereas this would clearly be at best a couple of lines that are very, very generic. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So you think it's good that Melania wants to be Michelle?Tequilla said:
Completely missing the markTierbsHsotBoobs said:
When your campaign is centered on attacking the credibility of a former First Lady, it helps if your prospective First Lady doesn't shit the bed.dflea said:Has anyone really ever given a shit what the First Lady, or presumptive First Lady says?
I stopped listening 20 seconds in - and just checked out her tits, mouth, and ass for the remainder of the time. -
That is a gracious concession of defeat that you just posted. I accept your concession.Southerndawg said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So you think it's good that Melania wants to be Michelle?Tequilla said:
Completely missing the markTierbsHsotBoobs said:
When your campaign is centered on attacking the credibility of a former First Lady, it helps if your prospective First Lady doesn't shit the bed.dflea said:Has anyone really ever given a shit what the First Lady, or presumptive First Lady says?
I stopped listening 20 seconds in - and just checked out her tits, mouth, and ass for the remainder of the time.