Top 10 true sophomores in college football
2. Myles Gaskin, RB, Washington
+26.8 overall; No. 5 among returning FBS running backs
Gaskin rushed for 1302 yards and 14 touchdowns as a freshman. He proved to be one of the more elusive running backs in the country forcing 61 missed tackles and earning a 104.6 elusive rating which ranks No. 9 among returning FBS running backs. Gaskin showed an ability to break tackles with 878 of his rushing yards coming after contact. He also showed a he could create big plays as he had 19 runs of 15 yards or more and a 46.9 breakaway percentage which also ranks No. 9 among returning FBS running backs.
4. Jake Browning, QB, Washington
+21.6 overall; No. 15 among returning FBS quarterbacks
The second Husky to make the list, Browning could potentially lead the team to a darkhorse College Football Playoff berth this season. Browning was the highest-graded freshman quarterback in 2015 as he outperformed UCLA’s Josh Rosen over the course of the year and was our selection for Al-Freshman team quarterback. He completed 233 of 370 passes (63 percent) for 2,955 yards with 16 touchdowns and 10 interceptions. Browning was one of the more effective deep ball passers in all of FBS last season as his 50.0 percent accuracy on passes targeted 20 yards or more downfield ranks No. 6 among returning FBS quarterbacks. Browning was also very impressive under duress, as he completed 66.7 percent of his passes when pressured which ranks No. 2 among returning FBS quarterbacks.
BROWNING CAN'T THROW THE DEEP BALL!!! HE'S GARBAGE!!! WE'RE FUCKED!!!!!!
Comments
-
Agree.pat_hm said:https://www.profootballfocus.com/college-football-top-10-true-sophomores-derwin-james-josh-rosen/
2. Myles Gaskin, RB, Washington
+26.8 overall; No. 5 among returning FBS running backs
Gaskin rushed for 1302 yards and 14 touchdowns as a freshman. He proved to be one of the more elusive running backs in the country forcing 61 missed tackles and earning a 104.6 elusive rating which ranks No. 9 among returning FBS running backs. Gaskin showed an ability to break tackles with 878 of his rushing yards coming after contact. He also showed a he could create big plays as he had 19 runs of 15 yards or more and a 46.9 breakaway percentage which also ranks No. 9 among returning FBS running backs.
4. Jake Browning, QB, Washington
+21.6 overall; No. 15 among returning FBS quarterbacks
The second Husky to make the list, Browning could potentially lead the team to a darkhorse College Football Playoff berth this season. Browning was the highest-graded freshman quarterback in 2015 as he outperformed UCLA’s Josh Rosen over the course of the year and was our selection for Al-Freshman team quarterback. He completed 233 of 370 passes (63 percent) for 2,955 yards with 16 touchdowns and 10 interceptions. Browning was one of the more effective deep ball passers in all of FBS last season as his 50.0 percent accuracy on passes targeted 20 yards or more downfield ranks No. 6 among returning FBS quarterbacks. Browning was also very impressive under duress, as he completed 66.7 percent of his passes when pressured which ranks No. 2 among returning FBS quarterbacks.
BROWNING CAN'T THROW THE DEEP BALL!!! HE'S GARBAGE!!! WE'RE FUCKED!!!!!! -
Off Season Natty was secured months ago. This shit is just piling on.
-
I love the Top 10 Sophomores list. It obviously pulls from a huge sample set of what, 30-40 guys who got significant playing time as freshmen.
I want to see a Top 10 list of grad assistants next. -
Fuck you and your preseason rankings bullshit.
-
It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
-
I think his actual performance fueled the narrative
-
I don't how many kids it pulls from but in this day and age there are WAY more than 30- 40 true freshman playing in college football. Where did you pull that number from? Your ass?? There was probably 40 true freshman who played in the pac 12!!! That's only 3 per team average there smart guy. Good call, bud. Nice effort to attempt to delegitimize this list to look cool in front of your friends.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:I love the Top 10 Sophomores list. It obviously pulls from a huge sample set of what, 30-40 guys who got significant playing time as freshmen.
I want to see a Top 10 list of grad assistants next.
I'd love to talk to the fans from Florida State, Bama, Georgia, LSU etc who also have players that made this list to see if they hate on their guys as much as the idiots on this board hate on our freshman. These SEC guys would kill for a talent like Browning. You guys are clueless. -
Today on HH: pat_hm super fired up
-
That off season natty joke just gets funnier every time. Except we've never been in a situation bringing back this much young, graded out talent at key positions in the last 15 years. But this will be the same as year, right? Rinse. Later. Repeat.Swaye said:Off Season Natty was secured months ago. This shit is just piling on.
-
Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
-
Ok. Well I don't think he's played as poorly as people on here make it seem. This list seems to lean more to that narrative based, based solely on objective grades. They charted every snap he took this year. It wasn't just watching a few over thrown deep balls to Jaydon Mickens. PFF focus grades out every play and they love him. So are they wrong?RaceBannon said:I think his actual performance fueled the narrative
And the fuck did people expect from a true freshman?? His numbers were comparable to Goff, Luck and Rosen's true freshman years yet people treat him like Ronnie Fouch. I think it's crazy. -
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
-
Everyone sucks.pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
-
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think? -
@JackTorsDawg2k true!!!??¡¡1pat_hm said:
I don't how many kids it pulls from but in this day and age there are WAY more than 30- 40 true freshman playing in college football. Where did you pull that number from? Your ass?? There was probably 40 true freshman who played in the pac 12!!! That's only 3 per team average there smart guy. Good call, bud. Nice effort to attempt to delegitimize this list to look cool in front of your friends.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:I love the Top 10 Sophomores list. It obviously pulls from a huge sample set of what, 30-40 guys who got significant playing time as freshmen.
I want to see a Top 10 list of grad assistants next.
I'd love to talk to the fans from Florida State, Bama, Georgia, LSU etc who also have players that made this list to see if they hate on their guys as much as the idiots on this board hate on our freshman. These SEC guys would kill for a talent like Browning. You guys are clueless. -
Clearly one of the best true freshmen QBs in the country last year. But yeah, shit performance fueling this narrative. Good grief.RaceBannon said:I think his actual performance fueled the narrative
-
He will win. UW will win. He's a winner. He's already hit Jake Lockers win ceiling in his first season, sky's the limit.sarktastic said:
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think? -
Hey bud, I agree with you...on paper things look better than they have in a long time, but fuck if I haven't heard that to describe at least half of our losing shit seasons the last decade. I am on record as saying I hope like hell Pete turns out to be the guy, but he doesn't get any loyalty from me until he actually wins big. Putting beams in place doesn't mean shit if you can't build the barn.pat_hm said:
That off season natty joke just gets funnier every time. Except we've never been in a situation bringing back this much young, graded out talent at key positions in the last 15 years. But this will be the same as year, right? Rinse. Later. Repeat.Swaye said:Off Season Natty was secured months ago. This shit is just piling on.
-
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
-
Comparing Jake to Jack the Loser just proves how retarded you are.pat_hm said:
He will win. UW will win. He's a winner. He's already hit Jake Lockers win ceiling in his first season, sky's the limit.sarktastic said:
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think? -
I compared his win total fucktard. Not his game. They are complete opposite players. A run first safety playing QB vs a cerebral accurate passer. Night and day.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparing Jake to Jack the Loser just proves how retarded you are.pat_hm said:
He will win. UW will win. He's a winner. He's already hit Jake Lockers win ceiling in his first season, sky's the limit.sarktastic said:
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think? -
If Pete underwhelms and wins 7 or 8 again we'll all know he's a myth and not the guy for the job. I'm with you 100%. That's not going to happen though. It starts under center with Browning.Swaye said:
Hey bud, I agree with you...on paper things look better than they have in a long time, but fuck if I haven't heard that to describe at least half of our losing shit seasons the last decade. I am on record as saying I hope like hell Pete turns out to be the guy, but he doesn't get any loyalty from me until he actually wins big. Putting beams in place doesn't mean shit if you can't build the barn.pat_hm said:
That off season natty joke just gets funnier every time. Except we've never been in a situation bringing back this much young, graded out talent at key positions in the last 15 years. But this will be the same as year, right? Rinse. Later. Repeat.Swaye said:Off Season Natty was secured months ago. This shit is just piling on.
-
Subjective bullshit opinion list?? I think we've got a coug on the board. Wow. Jesus man. Wake up. Do you know anything about PFF?? How they grade out every single play?? It's the fucking opposite of a subjective list you idiot. You see the number under the name, that's a grade. Do you know what a grade is? If you grade positive your a good player, if you grade negative your a bad player. Catching on?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
If you want a good subjective list go read Adam Jude or Ted Miller, their lists might be a little easier for your bird brain to comprehend. -
Jack's win total was shit.pat_hm said:
I compared his win total fucktard. Not his game. They are complete opposite players. A run first safety playing QB vs a cerebral accurate passer. Night and day.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparing Jake to Jack the Loser just proves how retarded you are.pat_hm said:
He will win. UW will win. He's a winner. He's already hit Jake Lockers win ceiling in his first season, sky's the limit.sarktastic said:
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think?
HTH -
They do a lot of work on their subjective grading, but it's still subjective.pat_hm said:
Subjective bullshit opinion list?? I think we've got a coug on the board. Wow. Jesus man. Wake up. Do you know anything about PFF?? How they grade out every single play?? It's the fucking opposite of a subjective list you idiot. You see the number under the name, that's a grade. Do you know what a grade is? If you grade positive your a good player, if you grade negative your a bad player. Catching on?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
If you want a good subjective list go read Adam Jude or Ted Miller, their lists might be a little easier for your bird brain to comprehend. -
To me he has to win 10, and he needs to actually win one of the USC/Stanford/Oregon games. He can't win 10 but lose hard to every good team he plays. That's what it will take for me to start to believe...9-3 going into some dumb bowl with losses to USC and Oregon and getting obliterated by Stanford tells me he was a huge fucking mirage....pat_hm said:
If Pete underwhelms and wins 7 or 8 again we'll all know he's a myth and not the guy for the job. I'm with you 100%. That's not going to happen though. It starts under center with Browning.Swaye said:
Hey bud, I agree with you...on paper things look better than they have in a long time, but fuck if I haven't heard that to describe at least half of our losing shit seasons the last decade. I am on record as saying I hope like hell Pete turns out to be the guy, but he doesn't get any loyalty from me until he actually wins big. Putting beams in place doesn't mean shit if you can't build the barn.pat_hm said:
That off season natty joke just gets funnier every time. Except we've never been in a situation bringing back this much young, graded out talent at key positions in the last 15 years. But this will be the same as year, right? Rinse. Later. Repeat.Swaye said:Off Season Natty was secured months ago. This shit is just piling on.
Now, head into the bowl game at 9-3 with a stinker against ASU or some other crap program but convincing wins against USC and Furd, then destory some assholes in the bowl game....doogitup.gif -
DisagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
They do a lot of work on their subjective grading, but it's still subjective.pat_hm said:
Subjective bullshit opinion list?? I think we've got a coug on the board. Wow. Jesus man. Wake up. Do you know anything about PFF?? How they grade out every single play?? It's the fucking opposite of a subjective list you idiot. You see the number under the name, that's a grade. Do you know what a grade is? If you grade positive your a good player, if you grade negative your a bad player. Catching on?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
If you want a good subjective list go read Adam Jude or Ted Miller, their lists might be a little easier for your bird brain to comprehend. -
Agree to disagreepat_hm said:
DisagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
They do a lot of work on their subjective grading, but it's still subjective.pat_hm said:
Subjective bullshit opinion list?? I think we've got a coug on the board. Wow. Jesus man. Wake up. Do you know anything about PFF?? How they grade out every single play?? It's the fucking opposite of a subjective list you idiot. You see the number under the name, that's a grade. Do you know what a grade is? If you grade positive your a good player, if you grade negative your a bad player. Catching on?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
If you want a good subjective list go read Adam Jude or Ted Miller, their lists might be a little easier for your bird brain to comprehend. -
Writing down and repeating positive affirmations to change your mental outlook only applies to your life and goals, not to others.pat_hm said:
He will win. UW will win. He's a winner. He's already hit Jake Lockers win ceiling in his first season, sky's the limit.sarktastic said:
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think? -
I don't have the Pac12 network so I didn't see Browning beat up cripples. Except for WSU (zing) where the defense scored 3 times. I saw him shit the bed when it mattered
