Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Top 10 true sophomores in college football
Comments
-
I compared his win total fucktard. Not his game. They are complete opposite players. A run first safety playing QB vs a cerebral accurate passer. Night and day.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparing Jake to Jack the Loser just proves how retarded you are.pat_hm said:
He will win. UW will win. He's a winner. He's already hit Jake Lockers win ceiling in his first season, sky's the limit.sarktastic said:
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think? -
If Pete underwhelms and wins 7 or 8 again we'll all know he's a myth and not the guy for the job. I'm with you 100%. That's not going to happen though. It starts under center with Browning.Swaye said:
Hey bud, I agree with you...on paper things look better than they have in a long time, but fuck if I haven't heard that to describe at least half of our losing shit seasons the last decade. I am on record as saying I hope like hell Pete turns out to be the guy, but he doesn't get any loyalty from me until he actually wins big. Putting beams in place doesn't mean shit if you can't build the barn.pat_hm said:
That off season natty joke just gets funnier every time. Except we've never been in a situation bringing back this much young, graded out talent at key positions in the last 15 years. But this will be the same as year, right? Rinse. Later. Repeat.Swaye said:Off Season Natty was secured months ago. This shit is just piling on.
-
Subjective bullshit opinion list?? I think we've got a coug on the board. Wow. Jesus man. Wake up. Do you know anything about PFF?? How they grade out every single play?? It's the fucking opposite of a subjective list you idiot. You see the number under the name, that's a grade. Do you know what a grade is? If you grade positive your a good player, if you grade negative your a bad player. Catching on?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
If you want a good subjective list go read Adam Jude or Ted Miller, their lists might be a little easier for your bird brain to comprehend. -
Jack's win total was shit.pat_hm said:
I compared his win total fucktard. Not his game. They are complete opposite players. A run first safety playing QB vs a cerebral accurate passer. Night and day.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparing Jake to Jack the Loser just proves how retarded you are.pat_hm said:
He will win. UW will win. He's a winner. He's already hit Jake Lockers win ceiling in his first season, sky's the limit.sarktastic said:
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think?
HTH -
They do a lot of work on their subjective grading, but it's still subjective.pat_hm said:
Subjective bullshit opinion list?? I think we've got a coug on the board. Wow. Jesus man. Wake up. Do you know anything about PFF?? How they grade out every single play?? It's the fucking opposite of a subjective list you idiot. You see the number under the name, that's a grade. Do you know what a grade is? If you grade positive your a good player, if you grade negative your a bad player. Catching on?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
If you want a good subjective list go read Adam Jude or Ted Miller, their lists might be a little easier for your bird brain to comprehend. -
To me he has to win 10, and he needs to actually win one of the USC/Stanford/Oregon games. He can't win 10 but lose hard to every good team he plays. That's what it will take for me to start to believe...9-3 going into some dumb bowl with losses to USC and Oregon and getting obliterated by Stanford tells me he was a huge fucking mirage....pat_hm said:
If Pete underwhelms and wins 7 or 8 again we'll all know he's a myth and not the guy for the job. I'm with you 100%. That's not going to happen though. It starts under center with Browning.Swaye said:
Hey bud, I agree with you...on paper things look better than they have in a long time, but fuck if I haven't heard that to describe at least half of our losing shit seasons the last decade. I am on record as saying I hope like hell Pete turns out to be the guy, but he doesn't get any loyalty from me until he actually wins big. Putting beams in place doesn't mean shit if you can't build the barn.pat_hm said:
That off season natty joke just gets funnier every time. Except we've never been in a situation bringing back this much young, graded out talent at key positions in the last 15 years. But this will be the same as year, right? Rinse. Later. Repeat.Swaye said:Off Season Natty was secured months ago. This shit is just piling on.
Now, head into the bowl game at 9-3 with a stinker against ASU or some other crap program but convincing wins against USC and Furd, then destory some assholes in the bowl game....doogitup.gif -
DisagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
They do a lot of work on their subjective grading, but it's still subjective.pat_hm said:
Subjective bullshit opinion list?? I think we've got a coug on the board. Wow. Jesus man. Wake up. Do you know anything about PFF?? How they grade out every single play?? It's the fucking opposite of a subjective list you idiot. You see the number under the name, that's a grade. Do you know what a grade is? If you grade positive your a good player, if you grade negative your a bad player. Catching on?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
If you want a good subjective list go read Adam Jude or Ted Miller, their lists might be a little easier for your bird brain to comprehend. -
Agree to disagreepat_hm said:
DisagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
They do a lot of work on their subjective grading, but it's still subjective.pat_hm said:
Subjective bullshit opinion list?? I think we've got a coug on the board. Wow. Jesus man. Wake up. Do you know anything about PFF?? How they grade out every single play?? It's the fucking opposite of a subjective list you idiot. You see the number under the name, that's a grade. Do you know what a grade is? If you grade positive your a good player, if you grade negative your a bad player. Catching on?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
An subjective bullshit opinion list is fact?pat_hm said:It's so fun getting all you Anti-Browning people all rlled up.These are facts, idiots. Facts you obviously want to ignore to mold your narrative that the kid sucks. Pathetic.
If you want a good subjective list go read Adam Jude or Ted Miller, their lists might be a little easier for your bird brain to comprehend. -
Writing down and repeating positive affirmations to change your mental outlook only applies to your life and goals, not to others.pat_hm said:
He will win. UW will win. He's a winner. He's already hit Jake Lockers win ceiling in his first season, sky's the limit.sarktastic said:
So what?pat_hm said:
I have and have always been a Browning truther. But it's also nice when a service like PFF, who has legit football people, agrees with what what I saw as well. They aren't wearing purple colored glasses. His talent is legit. People should be more pumped up becuase the best is yet to come. They like him better than Rosen and people still are salty. Man.sarktastic said:Can't you just watch the team and make your own fucking observations? Christ.
He wins, everybody will love him.
He loses and he'll be hated as a false prophet, forever. Why do you care at all what others think? -
I don't have the Pac12 network so I didn't see Browning beat up cripples. Except for WSU (zing) where the defense scored 3 times. I saw him shit the bed when it mattered
