Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Has ISIS Infiltrated Homeland Security? Orlando Terrorist Worked for Major DHS Contractor
Comments
-
Ballfag podcast?
-
-
-
You mean like the Cavs and Donald Trump?RaceBannon said: -
It's a 7 game series ballgagBallSacked said:
You mean like the Cavs and Donald Trump?RaceBannon said:
-
No that is not what I said. I am talking personal armament including machine guns. Maybe you're not aware that in more than half the states machine guns are legal. Many rules and checks that have to be followed and done but legal and you can go shoot them.salemcoog said:
So by your rationale, anyone that wants them, should have the right to Tanks, RPG's, armed drowns, F-18's and so on, if they can afford them. Because afterall, the military has them and so the citizenry can overthrow the government,teh should have them too.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
If I had only one wish today, it would that your internet service to the bunker would be cut off, so Ididn't have to reply to that sack of shit of a post and more like them.
Arms are so we can overthrow the people in the government not fight our army. Maybe you don't know that it is illegal to use the US military on US soil. It's another little part of the constitution. I certainly hope and pray that our own military would not turn against the people. Odd how Obunghole has been dumping top brass though and the new litmus question for generals is "would you fire on US citizens". But hey I'm one of those crazy constitutionalist kind of people that actually expect the government to follow the rules. The constitution our was written to constrain and contain the government not the people.
I'm thinking US history at Cuog land was a bit lacking. -
So you do support gun control. Why not background checks on all purchases?Sledog said:
No that is not what I said. I am talking personal armament including machine guns. Maybe you're not aware that in more than half the states machine guns are legal. Many rules and checks that have to be followed and done but legal and you can go shoot them.salemcoog said:
So by your rationale, anyone that wants them, should have the right to Tanks, RPG's, armed drowns, F-18's and so on, if they can afford them. Because afterall, the military has them and so the citizenry can overthrow the government,teh should have them too.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
If I had only one wish today, it would that your internet service to the bunker would be cut off, so Ididn't have to reply to that sack of shit of a post and more like them.
Arms are so we can overthrow the people in the government not fight our army. Maybe you don't know that it is illegal to use the US military on US soil. It's another little part of the constitution. I certainly hope and pray that our own military would not turn against the people. Odd how Obunghole has been dumping top brass though and the new litmus question for generals is "would you fire on US citizens". But hey I'm one of those crazy constitutionalist kind of people that actually expect the government to follow the rules. The constitution our was written to constrain and contain the government not the people.
I'm thinking US history at Cuog land was a bit lacking.
Does Obama scare you that much? Holy fuck you are a pussy. -
So you do support gun control. Why not background checks on all purchases?Sledog said:
No that is not what I said. I am talking personal armament including machine guns. Maybe you're not aware that in more than half the states machine guns are legal. Many rules and checks that have to be followed and done but legal and you can go shoot them.salemcoog said:
So by your rationale, anyone that wants them, should have the right to Tanks, RPG's, armed drowns, F-18's and so on, if they can afford them. Because afterall, the military has them and so the citizenry can overthrow the government,teh should have them too.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
If I had only one wish today, it would that your internet service to the bunker would be cut off, so Ididn't have to reply to that sack of shit of a post and more like them.
Arms are so we can overthrow the people in the government not fight our army. Maybe you don't know that it is illegal to use the US military on US soil. It's another little part of the constitution. I certainly hope and pray that our own military would not turn against the people. Odd how Obunghole has been dumping top brass though and the new litmus question for generals is "would you fire on US citizens". But hey I'm one of those crazy constitutionalist kind of people that actually expect the government to follow the rules. The constitution our was written to constrain and contain the government not the people.
I'm thinking US history at Cuog land was a bit lacking.
Does Obama scare you that much? Holy fuck you are a pussy. -
So you do support gun control. Why not background checks on all purchases?
Does Obama scare you that much? Holy fuck you are a pussy. -
Fucking shitty cell service.salemcoog said:So you do support gun control. Why not background checks on all purchases?
Does Obama scare you that much? Holy fuck you are a pussy. -
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”2001400ex said:
So you do support gun control. Why not background checks on all purchases?Sledog said:
No that is not what I said. I am talking personal armament including machine guns. Maybe you're not aware that in more than half the states machine guns are legal. Many rules and checks that have to be followed and done but legal and you can go shoot them.salemcoog said:
So by your rationale, anyone that wants them, should have the right to Tanks, RPG's, armed drowns, F-18's and so on, if they can afford them. Because afterall, the military has them and so the citizenry can overthrow the government,teh should have them too.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
If I had only one wish today, it would that your internet service to the bunker would be cut off, so Ididn't have to reply to that sack of shit of a post and more like them.
Arms are so we can overthrow the people in the government not fight our army. Maybe you don't know that it is illegal to use the US military on US soil. It's another little part of the constitution. I certainly hope and pray that our own military would not turn against the people. Odd how Obunghole has been dumping top brass though and the new litmus question for generals is "would you fire on US citizens". But hey I'm one of those crazy constitutionalist kind of people that actually expect the government to follow the rules. The constitution our was written to constrain and contain the government not the people.
I'm thinking US history at Cuog land was a bit lacking.
Does Obama scare you that much? Holy fuck you are a pussy.
― Samuel Adams
The founders sure as hell weren't pussies. Pussies are the rabbit people scared of their own shadow and unable to tend to their own needs and security. The government
is not supposed to be here to take care of you. Now please grow a set and get over it.
I can't help it if your Obamaphone is shitty. They just used my money to buy it I didn't pick it out for you. -
Sam Adams beer is marginal.Sledog said:
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”2001400ex said:
So you do support gun control. Why not background checks on all purchases?Sledog said:
No that is not what I said. I am talking personal armament including machine guns. Maybe you're not aware that in more than half the states machine guns are legal. Many rules and checks that have to be followed and done but legal and you can go shoot them.salemcoog said:
So by your rationale, anyone that wants them, should have the right to Tanks, RPG's, armed drowns, F-18's and so on, if they can afford them. Because afterall, the military has them and so the citizenry can overthrow the government,teh should have them too.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
If I had only one wish today, it would that your internet service to the bunker would be cut off, so Ididn't have to reply to that sack of shit of a post and more like them.
Arms are so we can overthrow the people in the government not fight our army. Maybe you don't know that it is illegal to use the US military on US soil. It's another little part of the constitution. I certainly hope and pray that our own military would not turn against the people. Odd how Obunghole has been dumping top brass though and the new litmus question for generals is "would you fire on US citizens". But hey I'm one of those crazy constitutionalist kind of people that actually expect the government to follow the rules. The constitution our was written to constrain and contain the government not the people.
I'm thinking US history at Cuog land was a bit lacking.
Does Obama scare you that much? Holy fuck you are a pussy.
― Samuel Adams
The founders sure as hell weren't pussies. Pussies are the rabbit people scared of their own shadow and unable to tend to their own needs and security. The government
is not supposed to be here to take care of you. Now please grow a set and get over it.
I can't help it if your Obamaphone is shitty. They just used my money to buy it I didn't pick it out for you.
And I called you a pussy. You are scared of Obama. Socialism!!!! Communism!!!!! Muslim!!!!
I know you are shaking and about to vomit . -
Other way around Hondo. You run scared and wish everyone disarmed so they can be a little bleating rabbit just like you. You hate and fear those that can take care of themselves and are unafraid to do so. "May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”2001400ex said:
Sam Adams beer is marginal.Sledog said:
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”2001400ex said:
So you do support gun control. Why not background checks on all purchases?Sledog said:
No that is not what I said. I am talking personal armament including machine guns. Maybe you're not aware that in more than half the states machine guns are legal. Many rules and checks that have to be followed and done but legal and you can go shoot them.salemcoog said:
So by your rationale, anyone that wants them, should have the right to Tanks, RPG's, armed drowns, F-18's and so on, if they can afford them. Because afterall, the military has them and so the citizenry can overthrow the government,teh should have them too.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
If I had only one wish today, it would that your internet service to the bunker would be cut off, so Ididn't have to reply to that sack of shit of a post and more like them.
Arms are so we can overthrow the people in the government not fight our army. Maybe you don't know that it is illegal to use the US military on US soil. It's another little part of the constitution. I certainly hope and pray that our own military would not turn against the people. Odd how Obunghole has been dumping top brass though and the new litmus question for generals is "would you fire on US citizens". But hey I'm one of those crazy constitutionalist kind of people that actually expect the government to follow the rules. The constitution our was written to constrain and contain the government not the people.
I'm thinking US history at Cuog land was a bit lacking.
Does Obama scare you that much? Holy fuck you are a pussy.
― Samuel Adams
The founders sure as hell weren't pussies. Pussies are the rabbit people scared of their own shadow and unable to tend to their own needs and security. The government
is not supposed to be here to take care of you. Now please grow a set and get over it.
I can't help it if your Obamaphone is shitty. They just used my money to buy it I didn't pick it out for you.
And I called you a pussy. You are scared of Obama. Socialism!!!! Communism!!!!! Muslim!!!!
I know you are shaking and about to vomit .
-
Where have I conveyed I want to disarm Americans? That's fucktarded. Not to mention I don't hate it fear anyone. But you keep being afraid of all Muslims.
-
You somehow equate suspicion with fear. Obviously you were raised a girl.2001400ex said:Where have I conveyed I want to disarm Americans? That's fucktarded. Not to mention I don't hate it fear anyone. But you keep being afraid of all Muslims.
-
I can picture you grabbing your gun when someone walks out of the shower with a towel on their head.Sledog said:
You somehow equate suspicion with fear. Obviously you were raised a girl.2001400ex said:Where have I conveyed I want to disarm Americans? That's fucktarded. Not to mention I don't hate it fear anyone. But you keep being afraid of all Muslims.
-
Yeah but did you shave your legs and pits?2001400ex said:
I can picture you grabbing your gun when someone walks out of the shower with a towel on their head.Sledog said:
You somehow equate suspicion with fear. Obviously you were raised a girl.2001400ex said:Where have I conveyed I want to disarm Americans? That's fucktarded. Not to mention I don't hate it fear anyone. But you keep being afraid of all Muslims.
-
Info for the liberal morons out there.
-
FREE PUB for drummers!!!!!1
-
Keep up the false "disarming Americans" narrative. I especially like the logic of "homicides are way down" but then your side promotes "mass shootings are way up under Obama". Which is it?Sledog said:Info for the liberal morons out there.
-
Shootings are down. Way down and gun ownership is way up. Those are FBI uniform crime stats Sparky. Your BS does not diminish them.2001400ex said:
Keep up the false "disarming Americans" narrative. I especially like the logic of "homicides are way down" but then your side promotes "mass shootings are way up under Obama". Which is it?Sledog said:Info for the liberal morons out there.
Democrats are the most frequent mass shooters at something like 70+ percent (including Orlando!) why don't we outlaw them? -
Here's the real analysis on gun control and it's effects. The Swiss have fully automatic weapons at home and the government sells them ammo at cost to practice with...................
-
More fucktarded logic as always. Australia confiscated guns with a result of crime and shootings going down drastically. Does that mean we should do that here?Sledog said:Here's the real analysis on gun control and it's effects. The Swiss have fully automatic weapons at home and the government sells them ammo at cost to practice with...................
Didn't think so. -
Obama and Hillary think so2001400ex said:
More fucktarded logic as always. Australia confiscated guns with a result of crime and shootings going down drastically. Does that mean we should do that here?Sledog said:Here's the real analysis on gun control and it's effects. The Swiss have fully automatic weapons at home and the government sells them ammo at cost to practice with...................
Didn't think so. -
No. They don't.RaceBannon said:
Obama and Hillary think so2001400ex said:
More fucktarded logic as always. Australia confiscated guns with a result of crime and shootings going down drastically. Does that mean we should do that here?Sledog said:Here's the real analysis on gun control and it's effects. The Swiss have fully automatic weapons at home and the government sells them ammo at cost to practice with...................
Didn't think so. -
That is convincing
-
The Australians don't think so. So you are for taking guns from everyone. Will you be the guy coming to my door? Who 'ya gonna call? Military won't, cops won't and certainly liberal pussies asking for this shit won't. How about outlawing Muslims and democrats? That would take care of 98% of the problem.2001400ex said:
More fucktarded logic as always. Australia confiscated guns with a result of crime and shootings going down drastically. Does that mean we should do that here?Sledog said:Here's the real analysis on gun control and it's effects. The Swiss have fully automatic weapons at home and the government sells them ammo at cost to practice with...................
Didn't think so. -
Where the fuck did you learn how to read? I mean it's one thing to troll people. But you actually believe what you are typing.Sledog said:
The Australians don't think so. So you are for taking guns from everyone. Will you be the guy coming to my door? Who 'ya gonna call? Military won't, cops won't and certainly liberal pussies asking for this shit won't. How about outlawing Muslims and democrats? That would take care of 98% of the problem.2001400ex said:
More fucktarded logic as always. Australia confiscated guns with a result of crime and shootings going down drastically. Does that mean we should do that here?Sledog said:Here's the real analysis on gun control and it's effects. The Swiss have fully automatic weapons at home and the government sells them ammo at cost to practice with...................
Didn't think so.
I'll type this slowly so you can understand. Ready? Ok..... No....... One...... Is..... Coming..... For..... Your.... guns.
