Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Has ISIS Infiltrated Homeland Security? Orlando Terrorist Worked for Major DHS Contractor
Comments
-
So let's do nothing then. Worked so far.PurpleJ said:
Or the FBI is too worried about being called racist to actually do their jobs. Guy should never have been in the country to begin with, let alone working for our government. But we can't bring into question their competence, can we? Why the FUCK is our government harboring known terrorists then?2001400ex said:
The FBI could have done something if Congress would have passed the bill about known terrorists not having access to guns. But too many nuts like you cling to guns so conservative politicians are afraid to pass any legislation related to guns. Which is FS.PurpleJ said:
Gun control won't result in taking away any guns from anyone. What a fucking whopper.2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
The FBI had the guy pegged and didn't do shit. Yet, we want to give an incompetent government more power and control....lol
Liberals and gays are super tolerant of cultures who want to kill them for their freedom, but oppose conservatives that want to protect them. The irony is always thicker than the minds which conceive such absurdities.
Don't forget the fact that the largest mass shooting of all time on US soil was actually conducted by the government at Wounded Knee (hi @Swaye ), and history is littered with examples of gun control being used to subvert the populace and install tyrannical governments.
Yet you still trust the government to keep us safe. A sucker is born every day I guess.
Many people oppose watch lists all together, because they understand the potential abuse of power that can result from such a thing. Someday we might put all political dissidents on a watch list and deny them their 2nd Amendment rights. What would stop them? -
I think you're misunderstanding who "we" is. HTH.2001400ex said:
So let's do nothing then. Worked so far.PurpleJ said:
Or the FBI is too worried about being called racist to actually do their jobs. Guy should never have been in the country to begin with, let alone working for our government. But we can't bring into question their competence, can we? Why the FUCK is our government harboring known terrorists then?2001400ex said:
The FBI could have done something if Congress would have passed the bill about known terrorists not having access to guns. But too many nuts like you cling to guns so conservative politicians are afraid to pass any legislation related to guns. Which is FS.PurpleJ said:
Gun control won't result in taking away any guns from anyone. What a fucking whopper.2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
The FBI had the guy pegged and didn't do shit. Yet, we want to give an incompetent government more power and control....lol
Liberals and gays are super tolerant of cultures who want to kill them for their freedom, but oppose conservatives that want to protect them. The irony is always thicker than the minds which conceive such absurdities.
Don't forget the fact that the largest mass shooting of all time on US soil was actually conducted by the government at Wounded Knee (hi @Swaye ), and history is littered with examples of gun control being used to subvert the populace and install tyrannical governments.
Yet you still trust the government to keep us safe. A sucker is born every day I guess.
Many people oppose watch lists all together, because they understand the potential abuse of power that can result from such a thing. Someday we might put all political dissidents on a watch list and deny them their 2nd Amendment rights. What would stop them?
-
WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING
-
Agreed.RaceBannon said:WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING
-
Such 5.3, JPurpleJ said:
Or the FBI is too worried about being called racist to actually do their jobs. Guy should never have been in the country to begin with, let alone working for our government. But we can't bring into question their competence, can we? Why the FUCK is our government harboring known terrorists then?2001400ex said:
The FBI could have done something if Congress would have passed the bill about known terrorists not having access to guns. But too many nuts like you cling to guns so conservative politicians are afraid to pass any legislation related to guns. Which is FS.PurpleJ said:
Gun control won't result in taking away any guns from anyone. What a fucking whopper.2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
The FBI had the guy pegged and didn't do shit. Yet, we want to give an incompetent government more power and control....lol
Liberals and gays are super tolerant of cultures who want to kill them for their freedom, but oppose conservatives that want to protect them. The irony is always thicker than the minds which conceive such absurdities.
Don't forget the fact that the largest mass shooting of all time on US soil was actually conducted by the government at Wounded Knee (hi @Swaye ), and history is littered with examples of gun control being used to subvert the populace and install tyrannical governments.
Yet you still trust the government to keep us safe. A sucker is born every day I guess.
Many people oppose watch lists all together, because they understand the potential abuse of power that can result from such a thing. Someday we might put all political dissidents on a watch list and deny them their 2nd Amendment rights. What would stop them? -
I am not in favor of arming you... assuming you are an American, of course2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
-
I don't have any disdain for the second amendment. At all. Is it so bad to have a background check prior to a gun purchase?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Remove your disdain for the 2nd amendment for a moment, and then consider this "known terrorist" bill denying any other constitutionally protected right, such as habeas corpus. Know Terrorist is essentially thought-crime. Being on a watch list of that sort has no due process. Personally, I don't think I like the implications of that either. But that's where a known terrorist list ends up.2001400ex said:
The FBI could have done something if Congress would have passed the bill about known terrorists not having access to guns. But too many nuts like you cling to guns so conservative politicians are afraid to pass any legislation related to guns. Which is FS.PurpleJ said:
Gun control won't result in taking away any guns from anyone. What a fucking whopper.2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
The FBI had the guy pegged and didn't do shit. Yet, we want to give an incompetent government more power and control....lol
Liberals and gays are super tolerant of cultures who want to kill them for their freedom, but oppose conservatives that want to protect them. The irony is always thicker than the minds which conceive such absurdities.
Don't forget the fact that the largest mass shooting of all time on US soil was actually conducted by the government at Wounded Knee (hi @Swaye ), and history is littered with examples of gun control being used to subvert the populace and install tyrannical governments.
Yet you still trust the government to keep us safe. A sucker is born every day I guess.
I do struggle with the freedom issue. Because I can see local authorities abusing the system with disallowing guns to people. But think of it this way, there is a no fly list. Do you think it's really that bad to have a list of people who can't fly that we deny gun purchases to? If you want to legally buy a gun, don't have terrorist affiliations. -
I'll put you down as PRO 2nd Amendment, neutral on the 1st, and ANTI the 5th.2001400ex said:
I don't have any disdain for the second amendment. At all. Is it so bad to have a background check prior to a gun purchase?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Remove your disdain for the 2nd amendment for a moment, and then consider this "known terrorist" bill denying any other constitutionally protected right, such as habeas corpus. Know Terrorist is essentially thought-crime. Being on a watch list of that sort has no due process. Personally, I don't think I like the implications of that either. But that's where a known terrorist list ends up.2001400ex said:
The FBI could have done something if Congress would have passed the bill about known terrorists not having access to guns. But too many nuts like you cling to guns so conservative politicians are afraid to pass any legislation related to guns. Which is FS.PurpleJ said:
Gun control won't result in taking away any guns from anyone. What a fucking whopper.2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
The FBI had the guy pegged and didn't do shit. Yet, we want to give an incompetent government more power and control....lol
Liberals and gays are super tolerant of cultures who want to kill them for their freedom, but oppose conservatives that want to protect them. The irony is always thicker than the minds which conceive such absurdities.
Don't forget the fact that the largest mass shooting of all time on US soil was actually conducted by the government at Wounded Knee (hi @Swaye ), and history is littered with examples of gun control being used to subvert the populace and install tyrannical governments.
Yet you still trust the government to keep us safe. A sucker is born every day I guess.
I do struggle with the freedom issue. Because I can see local authorities abusing the system with disallowing guns to people. But think of it this way, there is a no fly list. Do you think it's really that bad to have a list of people who can't fly that we deny gun purchases to? If you want to legally buy a gun, don't have terrorist affiliations. -
Who decides who is a terrorist and who is an honest American, Hondo?
-
You J, get to make that decision. But really I'd prefer that the death panels have that authority.PurpleJ said:Who decides who is a terrorist and who is an honest American, Hondo?
-
Lol sure.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'll put you down as PRO 2nd Amendment, neutral on the 1st, and ANTI the 5th.2001400ex said:
I don't have any disdain for the second amendment. At all. Is it so bad to have a background check prior to a gun purchase?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Remove your disdain for the 2nd amendment for a moment, and then consider this "known terrorist" bill denying any other constitutionally protected right, such as habeas corpus. Know Terrorist is essentially thought-crime. Being on a watch list of that sort has no due process. Personally, I don't think I like the implications of that either. But that's where a known terrorist list ends up.2001400ex said:
The FBI could have done something if Congress would have passed the bill about known terrorists not having access to guns. But too many nuts like you cling to guns so conservative politicians are afraid to pass any legislation related to guns. Which is FS.PurpleJ said:
Gun control won't result in taking away any guns from anyone. What a fucking whopper.2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
The FBI had the guy pegged and didn't do shit. Yet, we want to give an incompetent government more power and control....lol
Liberals and gays are super tolerant of cultures who want to kill them for their freedom, but oppose conservatives that want to protect them. The irony is always thicker than the minds which conceive such absurdities.
Don't forget the fact that the largest mass shooting of all time on US soil was actually conducted by the government at Wounded Knee (hi @Swaye ), and history is littered with examples of gun control being used to subvert the populace and install tyrannical governments.
Yet you still trust the government to keep us safe. A sucker is born every day I guess.
I do struggle with the freedom issue. Because I can see local authorities abusing the system with disallowing guns to people. But think of it this way, there is a no fly list. Do you think it's really that bad to have a list of people who can't fly that we deny gun purchases to? If you want to legally buy a gun, don't have terrorist affiliations. -
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution. -
The British should have branded the Patriots as terrorists and seized their guns after the tragic mass shooting in Boston.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution. -
It's a good thng that Roger Goodell wasn't the Commish back then or they would have been sanctioned on the spot until all th esudden they weren't and then were again,PurpleJ said:
The British should have branded the Patriots as terrorists and seized their guns after the tragic mass shooting in Boston.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution. -
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
-
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH -
How'd that work out for the dead people? Bad guys will always get what they want. Seems guns are illegal in Great Britain but the IRA never seems to be short of any type of military hardware. Of course outlawing drugs worked great too.2001400ex said:
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH -
Got to be the stupidest mother fucker on this planet2001400ex said:
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH -
Agreed - let's form a series of committees to investigate, led by another branch of Obama cabinet membersRaceBannon said:WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING
-
So by your rationale, anyone that wants them, should have the right to Tanks, RPG's, armed drowns, F-18's and so on, if they can afford them. Because afterall, the military has them and so the citizenry can overthrow the government,teh should have them too.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
If I had only one wish today, it would that your internet service to the bunker would be cut off, so Ididn't have to reply to that sack of shit of a post and more like them.
-
Goddell is a liar and a coward. Not responding to your post. Just throwing that out there.salemcoog said:
It's a good thng that Roger Goodell wasn't the Commish back then or they would have been sanctioned on the spot until all th esudden they weren't and then were again,PurpleJ said:
The British should have branded the Patriots as terrorists and seized their guns after the tragic mass shooting in Boston.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution. -
Likes to prove the other guy's point through sheer stupidity.2001400ex said:
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH -
Doesn't understand sarcasm through sheer stupidity.PurpleJ said:
Likes to prove the other guy's point through sheer stupidity.2001400ex said:
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH -
I know you weren't being sarcastic, but you weren't being sarcastic.2001400ex said:
Doesn't understand sarcasm through sheer stupidity.PurpleJ said:
Likes to prove the other guy's point through sheer stupidity.2001400ex said:
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH
-
Sledog has gun rights dialed in
-
I want an attack helicopter.
I could take care of some motherfuckers.................. -
This thread is gayer than the Pulse.
-
PM to Hondo
-
Looks like Ballfag survived Orlando
