Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Gaskin averaged 100 yards rushing per game as a true frosh?

EwaDawg
EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,335
Too lazy to verify. And, yes, that shit storm is my source. Considering his "late start" that isn't too bad.

http://www.uwdawgpound.com/2016/5/2/11529634/15-in-15-myles-gaskin-emerges-as-the-next-great-washington-husky-tailback

Yes, I know. Welcome to 2015. . . .
«1345

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    Mostly agree. We've yet to see him develop a WR or a QB though. Browning's development or lack thereof this year will be interesting to watch. Hopefully Our Hairy Bush can take the receivers places Brent's Peace never imagined.
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,335
    edited May 2016
    dnc said:

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    Mostly agree. We've yet to see him develop a WR or a QB though. Browning's development or lack thereof this year will be interesting to watch. Hopefully Our Hairy Bush can take the receivers places Brent's Peace never imagined.
    Should've said identifying and developing. And, yes, maybe more so on the Defensive side of the ball. While not finished products, I am a little surprised at what Gaskin, Brown shorts and other true frosh accomplished last year.


  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    Just another reason why the huskies are a preseason #17 ranked team in america and a dark horse national champion!!!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    Browning sucks

    #HiDoogles
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    phineas said:

    Just another reason why the huskies are a preseason #17 ranked team in america and a dark horse national champion!!!

    image
  • section_332
    section_332 Member Posts: 2,403
    Gaskin should be the entire offense will the 5 deep shots to Ross a game. In the end Sidney jones IV might have more TDs then cobrah.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Woof said:

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    Pete just took a grad student from the math department and turned him into a decent recruiter.

    image
    You just couldn't resist, could you?
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    True and accurate. Pac12 is way tougher, top to bottom, than the MW, where many of Pete's wins were in his pocket before the game started. Context matters for expectations.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    And a 17 year old qb with hairless armpits, 2 freshmen bookends (1 true) on the Oline, and 1 ok WR . Golly gee I wonder why we went 7-6. Oh with the #1 pick in the NFL draft taking snaps for cal, senior qb's at Stanford, Oregon and Utah...are you really this cunttarded J? Fuck Base, there's an open space for a new poster with a minimal football IQ. J's days are numbered. Fucking idiot
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    True and accurate. Pac12 is way tougher, top to bottom, than the MW, where many of Pete's wins were in his pocket before the game started. Context matters for expectations.
    Pete's #1 quality is as a sideline coach Turd. WTF, do you even watch college football? . 92-12 before he got to UW pretty much backs it up. I watched every notable game Pete coached at bsu. Simply a master in big games. Sometimes puppy just shakes his head at some of the shit that dribbles out your cunts out here (hi kim)
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    And a 17 year old qb with hairless armpits, 2 freshmen bookends (1 true) on the Oline, and 1 ok WR . Golly gee I wonder why we went 7-6. Oh with the #1 pick in the NFL draft taking snaps for cal, senior qb's at Stanford, Oregon and Utah...are you really this cunttarded J? Fuck Base, there's an open space for a new poster with a minimal football IQ. J's days are numbered. Fucking idiot
    Sounds like a lot of tired excuses. Your fucktard man crush Peterman can't figure out how to win with a good defense and stud running back in college football. Instead, he leans on the pre-pubescent boy wonder that he doused in anointing oil and set aflame with his half baked offensive philosophy.
    Lest we forget about the 2014 throw away season with the a defense that had three first rounders + one second rounder and practice squad legend Andrew Hudson
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    J, it takes a qb with a little practice to go with a "stud rb" to win at this level. Notice this team was deficient in that category? Are you really this dumb? Rhetorical question. You really are this dumb. Need a fix we can prolly all put our heads together and find you one. You have these periods of retardedness that can only be explained by a pipe, bottle or needle. I can get you a bottle only. Remember though, no HH member gets left behind. Smack is available around every corner in hilltop. Goid lord J get your sketchers on and beat feet. Check back when you got your wit back.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    J, it takes a qb with a little practice to go with a "stud rb" to win at this level. Notice this team was deficient in that category? Are you really this dumb? Rhetorical question. You really are this dumb. Need a fix we can prolly all put our heads together and find you one. You have these periods of retardedness that can only be explained by a pipe, bottle or needle. I can get you a bottle only. Remember though, no HH member gets left behind. Smack is available around every corner in hilltop. Goid lord J get your sketchers on and beat feet. Check back when you got your wit back.

    See Keith Price and Bishop Sankey; Jack Lockner and Chris Polk
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    True and accurate. Pac12 is way tougher, top to bottom, than the MW, where many of Pete's wins were in his pocket before the game started. Context matters for expectations.
    Pete's #1 quality is as a sideline coach Turd. WTF, do you even watch college football? . 92-12 before he got to UW pretty much backs it up. I watched every notable game Pete coached at bsu. Simply a master in big games. Sometimes puppy just shakes his head at some of the shit that dribbles out your cunts out here (hi kim)
    Horseshit Puppy. Jesus Christ.

    Master at the 2 minute drill against Oregon last year, Pup?
    Master of the offense at ASU last year?
    Master of game clock management at AZ in 2014?

    Not sure why you're so butthurt over the fact CP has room to improve in the Pac12, and appears to be doing so, while recruiting well and making necessary coaching changes to get the program where it belongs. You act like he's already in Saban's league because he beat 65 doormats in the MW on the way to his 92 wins.

    I predict 9-3 next year, because I expect UW to be a 10 win capable team that fucks up one winnable game, based on recent history. And were CP the coach you think he is already, Smiff would be history, not given a charity seat for one more year.
    Again Turd, as the young guys get more experience, the team AND record will improve. How hard is that to comprehend, Fuck!! Pete cant run a 2-minute offense with 18 year olds, in the best conference in the country. I need a sledgehammer to beat this into your fucking brains. 4-5 year plan...stick with it buffer. Next year is a bonus, 8 or 11 wins, Its a year early and ONLY because Petersen is among the top 5 coaches in America. No coach available could have turned this program around in 2.5 years. Absorb that you ignorant motherfuckers? Turd im not directing that at you as I think you are slowly grasping the concept)

    Enough about 2-minute offenses. Its fucking retarded and irrelevant. That was last year, with high schoo kids. Judge after next year, in Pete's 3rd year. he gets 5 years to turn Sarks mess around. What does a 2 munute drive vs a better team, in year 2, have to do with anything going forward? Id like to pop all you dumb fuckers right in the kisser, knock some sense into you. Turd you have 2 directions to go. The Wrong Ave SE or Puppy's Street. Hit puppy st, you'll be happy
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    edited May 2016

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    True and accurate. Pac12 is way tougher, top to bottom, than the MW, where many of Pete's wins were in his pocket before the game started. Context matters for expectations.
    Pete's #1 quality is as a sideline coach Turd. WTF, do you even watch college football? . 92-12 before he got to UW pretty much backs it up. I watched every notable game Pete coached at bsu. Simply a master in big games. Sometimes puppy just shakes his head at some of the shit that dribbles out your cunts out here (hi kim)
    Horseshit Puppy. Jesus Christ.

    Master at the 2 minute drill against Oregon last year, Pup?
    Master of the offense at ASU last year?
    Master of game clock management at AZ in 2014?

    Not sure why you're so butthurt over the fact CP has room to improve in the Pac12, and appears to be doing so, while recruiting well and making necessary coaching changes to get the program where it belongs. You act like he's already in Saban's league because he beat 65 doormats in the MW on the way to his 92 wins.

    I predict 9-3 next year, because I expect UW to be a 10 win capable team that fucks up one winnable game, based on recent history. And were CP the coach you think he is already, Smiff would be history, not given a charity seat for one more year.
    Again Turd, as the young guys get more experience, the team AND record will improve. How hard is that to comprehend, Fuck!! Pete cant run a 2-minute offense with 18 year olds, in the best conference in the country. I need a sledgehammer to beat this into your fucking brains. 4-5 year plan...stick with it buffer. Next year is a bonus, 8 or 11 wins, Its a year early and ONLY because Petersen is among the top 5 coaches in America. No coach available could have turned this program around in 2.5 years. Absorb that you ignorant motherfuckers? Turd im not directing that at you as I think you are slowly grasping the concept)

    Enough about 2-minute offenses. Its fucking retarded and irrelevant. That was last year, with high schoo kids. Judge after next year, in Pete's 3rd year. he gets 5 years to turn Sarks mess around. What does a 2 munute drive vs a better team, in year 2, have to do with anything going forward? Id like to pop all you dumb fuckers right in the kisser, knock some sense into you. Turd you have 2 directions to go. The Wrong Ave SE or Puppy's Street. Hit puppy st, you'll be happy
    Turn Around?

    Before Pete: 7,7,7,9
    Pete: 8,7
    Recap: Old coach: 7 to 9. New coach: 8 to 7. New coach wins 8 using same players from old coach's 9 win team.

    Regress: to move backward, go back. Revert to an earlier or less advanced state.




  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    True and accurate. Pac12 is way tougher, top to bottom, than the MW, where many of Pete's wins were in his pocket before the game started. Context matters for expectations.
    Pete's #1 quality is as a sideline coach Turd. WTF, do you even watch college football? . 92-12 before he got to UW pretty much backs it up. I watched every notable game Pete coached at bsu. Simply a master in big games. Sometimes puppy just shakes his head at some of the shit that dribbles out your cunts out here (hi kim)
    92-12 proved that he could inherit the dominant program in the WAC and beat retards.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Uhhh... Pete is gonna win the North this year.

    Relax.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,616 Standard Supporter
    edited May 2016

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    True and accurate. Pac12 is way tougher, top to bottom, than the MW, where many of Pete's wins were in his pocket before the game started. Context matters for expectations.
    Pete's #1 quality is as a sideline coach Turd. WTF, do you even watch college football? . 92-12 before he got to UW pretty much backs it up. I watched every notable game Pete coached at bsu. Simply a master in big games. Sometimes puppy just shakes his head at some of the shit that dribbles out your cunts out here (hi kim)
    92-12 proved that he could inherit the dominant program in the WAC and beat retards.
    Oklahomo, Oregon two years in a row, virgin tech, tcu twice, georgia Oregon st
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    True and accurate. Pac12 is way tougher, top to bottom, than the MW, where many of Pete's wins were in his pocket before the game started. Context matters for expectations.
    Pete's #1 quality is as a sideline coach Turd. WTF, do you even watch college football? . 92-12 before he got to UW pretty much backs it up. I watched every notable game Pete coached at bsu. Simply a master in big games. Sometimes puppy just shakes his head at some of the shit that dribbles out your cunts out here (hi kim)
    Horseshit Puppy. Jesus Christ.

    Master at the 2 minute drill against Oregon last year, Pup?
    Master of the offense at ASU last year?
    Master of game clock management at AZ in 2014?

    Not sure why you're so butthurt over the fact CP has room to improve in the Pac12, and appears to be doing so, while recruiting well and making necessary coaching changes to get the program where it belongs. You act like he's already in Saban's league because he beat 65 doormats in the MW on the way to his 92 wins.

    I predict 9-3 next year, because I expect UW to be a 10 win capable team that fucks up one winnable game, based on recent history. And were CP the coach you think he is already, Smiff would be history, not given a charity seat for one more year.
    Again Turd, as the young guys get more experience, the team AND record will improve. How hard is that to comprehend, Fuck!! Pete cant run a 2-minute offense with 18 year olds, in the best conference in the country. I need a sledgehammer to beat this into your fucking brains. 4-5 year plan...stick with it buffer. Next year is a bonus, 8 or 11 wins, Its a year early and ONLY because Petersen is among the top 5 coaches in America. No coach available could have turned this program around in 2.5 years. Absorb that you ignorant motherfuckers? Turd im not directing that at you as I think you are slowly grasping the concept)

    Enough about 2-minute offenses. Its fucking retarded and irrelevant. That was last year, with high school kids. Judge after next year, in Pete's 3rd year. he gets 5 years to turn Sarks mess around. What does a 2 munute drive vs a better team, in year 2, have to do with anything going forward? Id like to pop all you dumb fuckers right in the kisser, knock some sense into you. Turd you have 2 directions to go. The Wrong Ave SE or Puppy's Street. Hit puppy st, you'll be happy
    Except they aren't High School kids. They're fucking starting offensive players on a Pac12 team playing in a crown jewel stadium, doing jobs they've worked their whole lives for. The youth excuse doesn't cut it for shit coaching. And we've seen some real shit out there. In all fairness, not worse than Sark overall, but still shit. So, if you're the HC who chooses to start a frosh QB, you get the heat that comes with it when he can't hit wide open deep routes and doesn't know the playbook or chart well enough to execute basic hurry up plays.

    I believe this season will be better, Pup. And part of that is CP himself improving. 9-3 and you know why not 10+. I think we're done here.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    EwaDawg said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Yeah and we had a GREAT defense and only went 7-6 (4-5). The metrics are pointing up. Pete sure did a hell of a job last year.

    I know you're being sarcasmic but everything you said before the final sentence is true.

    Pete is good at developing talent. In game coaching? He can get better.

    True and accurate. Pac12 is way tougher, top to bottom, than the MW, where many of Pete's wins were in his pocket before the game started. Context matters for expectations.
    Pete's #1 quality is as a sideline coach Turd. WTF, do you even watch college football? . 92-12 before he got to UW pretty much backs it up. I watched every notable game Pete coached at bsu. Simply a master in big games. Sometimes puppy just shakes his head at some of the shit that dribbles out your cunts out here (hi kim)
    92-12 proved that he could inherit the dominant program in the WAC and beat retards.
    Oklahomo, Oregon two years in a row, virgin tech, tcu twice, georgia Oregon st
    Proving my point for me. He beat Stoops and a bunch of Doog Legends.