Tedford likes to pound the rock...

RoadDawg55 said:

The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.

I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.

BearsWiin said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

RaceBannon said:

Tedford's first year he got the legend Kyle Boller to approach the hype, beat UW for the first time since the 70's and made Boller a top draft pick. Then he had Rodgers as well.

After that the QB position is what held Cal and Tedford back from building on those early years. They sucked

What do you think J? Tommy?

Uhhhh, he was the head coach at Cal race. Anybody ever won at CAL? Well my boy Bruce Snyder managed to build something on the 5 year plan,; but like Mike Price, every 5 years wont get you into the head coaches hall of fame.

Now this is higher discussion, lets see who wants to play. My guess is not many. Much funner playing world of warcraft and staying up late into the night, then wee hours in the morning on the WoW Chat rooms. (With an occasional visit to HH for a useless post or 2) Some might even start a thread about something chincredible. No wonder this place is hind-teat dependent. Scratching and clawing for a little of mommy's milk (mommy being puppy, milk being puppy's upvote)

I know your being sarktastic, but many coaches have won at Cal. Cal had 20 HCs before 1956, and of those 20 HCs, only five had coaching records at Cal under .600. Of those five, four lasted only one year on the job. The fifth, Stub Allison, coached ten years and had a .578 record at Cal. Since 1956, the Bears have had only three of twelve HCs with a winning record at Cal: Mike White (.538), Bruce Snyder (.544 - which was both his record at Cal and overall), and Tedford (.590).

During the years of the PCC, Cal won or shared the conference title twelve times, the same number as USC. During the same time period, UW won or shared the title four times.

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Ice_Holmvik said:

RoadDawg55 said:

The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.

I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.

So you prefer Sark or Ty.

No. We prefer an actual winner. What the fuck did Tedford ever win?

Tequilla said:

RoadDawg55 said:

The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.

I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.

Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...

How's that working out for Romar?

Ice_Holmvik said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Ice_Holmvik said:

RoadDawg55 said:

The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.

I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.

So you prefer Sark or Ty.

You prefer little boys.

And you cant come up with anything better than that. Makes it easy to see how you cant recognize what UW has in Petersen. Oh the less than intelligent (you) will quote his record at UW as proof. Unfortunately you are not smart enough to dig deeper into what he was left and the difference in cultures between he and 7. He didn't come in and do a remodel. He came in and tore that bitch down past the foundation and started rebuilding brick by brick. However you are one of the non conformist goth nerds that permeates this place. You spout your non conformity anti Petersen vile like it is truth just because you and others repeat it. Sorry Chubbs but you are wrong. Don't bother hopping aboard the Petersen/Browning bandwagon next year. Your ticket was lost in processing.

Puppy, where the F is that higher discussion board? Serious dialog is sorely missing around here. Most of you fucks might as well be Oregon or Wazzu fans.

RoadDawg55 said:

Tequilla said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Tequilla said:

RoadDawg55 said:

The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.

I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.

Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...

How's that working out for Romar?

Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.

Let's be really honest ...

If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.

You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.

This is why you're a shit poster and an annoying doog. Every fucking play in the history of football looks good drawn up. Having your players execute, calling plays they can execute, calling the right plays at the right time... All of that goes into whether the play calling is good or bad.

Tedford had a huge article written about how he used everything he liked from watching other teams. The result was no identity, a huge playbook and confused players.

I've seen some of the worst two minute offenses under Peterman. Players have often looked confused and struggled to line up. We have aj delay of games even though we don't huddle.

Open your fucking eyes sometime.

Doogles said:

@HeretoBeatmyChest

PurpleJ said:

I do. I identify as having a BBC on a white man's body.