Tedford likes to pound the rock...
Comments
-
7-6 (4-5)Ice_Holmvik said:
And you cant come up with anything better than that. Makes it easy to see how you cant recognize what UW has in Petersen. Oh the less than intelligent (you) will quote his record at UW as proof. Unfortunately you are not smart enough to dig deeper into what he was left and the difference in cultures between he and 7. He didn't come in and do a remodel. He came in and tore that bitch down past the foundation and started rebuilding brick by brick. However you are one of the non conformist goth nerds that permeates this place. You spout your non conformity anti Petersen vile like it is truth just because you and others repeat it. Sorry Chubbs but you are wrong. Don't bother hopping aboard the Petersen/Browning bandwagon next year. Your ticket was lost in processing.RoadDawg55 said:
You prefer little boys.Ice_Holmvik said:
So you prefer Sark or Ty.RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Puppy, where the F is that higher discussion board? Serious dialog is sorely missing around here. Most of you fucks might as well be Oregon or Wazzu fans.
NOC. HTH.
-
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.Tequilla said:
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
How's that working out for Romar? -
Double reverse fly sweep flea flicker bubble screen
-
Best Spooge impression yet.Ice_Holmvik said:
And you cant come up with anything better than that. Makes it easy to see how you cant recognize what UW has in Petersen. Oh the less than intelligent (you) will quote his record at UW as proof. Unfortunately you are not smart enough to dig deeper into what he was left and the difference in cultures between he and 7. He didn't come in and do a remodel. He came in and tore that bitch down past the foundation and started rebuilding brick by brick. However you are one of the non conformist goth nerds that permeates this place. You spout your non conformity anti Petersen vile like it is truth just because you and others repeat it. Sorry Chubbs but you are wrong. Don't bother hopping aboard the Petersen/Browning bandwagon next year. Your ticket was lost in processing.RoadDawg55 said:
You prefer little boys.Ice_Holmvik said:
So you prefer Sark or Ty.RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Puppy, where the F is that higher discussion board? Serious dialog is sorely missing around here. Most of you fucks might as well be Oregon or Wazzu fans. -
That's nice, even though the thread is about Tedford.Ice_Holmvik said:
Hey dipshit, I was referring to Petersen. Try to keep up.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No. We prefer an actual winner. What the fuck did Tedford ever win?Ice_Holmvik said:
So you prefer Sark or Ty.RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Peterman is 8-10 by the way. He's no winner. -
Let's be really honest ...RoadDawg55 said:
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.Tequilla said:
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
How's that working out for Romar?
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that. -
#ProfileInCourageTequilla said:
Let's be really honest ...RoadDawg55 said:
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.Tequilla said:
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
How's that working out for Romar?
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that. -
Tequilla said:
Lesbi really honest ...RoadDawg55 said:
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.Tequilla said:
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
How's that working out for Romar?
With the talent that UW has - and had in 2014-2015 - if the play calling isgreatgood this team wins. If they don't, it proves Pete sucks and needs to pack his bags and LEAVE!
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that when UW moves beyond 5-4, 4-5 I'll start beating my meat for Pete. -
PM to Ice
If you have to tell people not to believe their eyes about a coach you should light yourself on fire and fuck off and die.
Hope this helps. -
If you can't see this I can't help youRaceBannon said:PM to Ice
If you have to tell people not to believe their eyes about a coach you should light yourself on fire and fuck off and die.
Hope this helps.
