The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
So you prefer Sark or Ty.
You prefer little boys.
And you cant come up with anything better than that. Makes it easy to see how you cant recognize what UW has in Petersen. Oh the less than intelligent (you) will quote his record at UW as proof. Unfortunately you are not smart enough to dig deeper into what he was left and the difference in cultures between he and 7. He didn't come in and do a remodel. He came in and tore that bitch down past the foundation and started rebuilding brick by brick. However you are one of the non conformist goth nerds that permeates this place. You spout your non conformity anti Petersen vile like it is truth just because you and others repeat it. Sorry Chubbs but you are wrong. Don't bother hopping aboard the Petersen/Browning bandwagon next year. Your ticket was lost in processing.
Puppy, where the F is that higher discussion board? Serious dialog is sorely missing around here. Most of you fucks might as well be Oregon or Wazzu fans.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...
How's that working out for Romar?
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
So you prefer Sark or Ty.
You prefer little boys.
And you cant come up with anything better than that. Makes it easy to see how you cant recognize what UW has in Petersen. Oh the less than intelligent (you) will quote his record at UW as proof. Unfortunately you are not smart enough to dig deeper into what he was left and the difference in cultures between he and 7. He didn't come in and do a remodel. He came in and tore that bitch down past the foundation and started rebuilding brick by brick. However you are one of the non conformist goth nerds that permeates this place. You spout your non conformity anti Petersen vile like it is truth just because you and others repeat it. Sorry Chubbs but you are wrong. Don't bother hopping aboard the Petersen/Browning bandwagon next year. Your ticket was lost in processing.
Puppy, where the F is that higher discussion board? Serious dialog is sorely missing around here. Most of you fucks might as well be Oregon or Wazzu fans.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
So you prefer Sark or Ty.
No. We prefer an actual winner. What the fuck did Tedford ever win?
Hey dipshit, I was referring to Petersen. Try to keep up.
That's nice, even though the thread is about Tedford.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...
How's that working out for Romar?
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.
Let's be really honest ...
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...
How's that working out for Romar?
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.
Let's be really honest ...
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...
How's that working out for Romar?
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.
Lesbi really honest ...
With the talent that UW has - and had in 2014-2015 - if the play calling is great good this team wins. If they don't, it proves Pete sucks and needs to pack his bags and LEAVE!
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that when UW moves beyond 5-4, 4-5 I'll start beating my meat for Pete.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...
How's that working out for Romar?
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.
Let's be really honest ...
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
This is why you're a shit poster and an annoying doog. Every fucking play in the history of football looks good drawn up. Having your players execute, calling plays they can execute, calling the right plays at the right time... All of that goes into whether the play calling is good or bad.
Tedford had a huge article written about how he used everything he liked from watching other teams. The result was no identity, a huge playbook and confused players.
I've seen some of the worst two minute offenses under Peterman. Players have often looked confused and struggled to line up. We have aj delay of games even though we don't huddle.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...
How's that working out for Romar?
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.
Let's be really honest ...
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
This is why you're a shit poster and an annoying doog. Every fucking play in the history of football looks good drawn up. Having your players execute, calling plays they can execute, calling the right plays at the right time... All of that goes into whether the play calling is good or bad.
Tedford had a huge article written about how he used everything he liked from watching other teams. The result was no identity, a huge playbook and confused players.
I've seen some of the worst two minute offenses under Peterman. Players have often looked confused and struggled to line up. We have aj delay of games even though we don't huddle.
@HeretoBeatmyChest is there an advanced metric that calculates the amount of times an OC has a Pass, Run, Pass 3 and out with a thousand yard rusher in the backfield?
The P,R,P 3 and out is the most predictable bullshit on the planet and pisses me off more than any other kind. I would bet the basement Smith leads the country in that category.
The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...
How's that working out for Romar?
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.
Let's be really honest ...
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
This is why you're a shit poster and an annoying doog. Every fucking play in the history of football looks good drawn up. Having your players execute, calling plays they can execute, calling the right plays at the right time... All of that goes into whether the play calling is good or bad.
Tedford had a huge article written about how he used everything he liked from watching other teams. The result was no identity, a huge playbook and confused players.
I've seen some of the worst two minute offenses under Peterman. Players have often looked confused and struggled to line up. We have aj delay of games even though we don't huddle.
Open your fucking eyes sometime.
Pretty sure Tequilla is an SMU fan posing as a TCU fan just to make Baylor look bad.
Comments
NOC. HTH.
Peterman is 8-10 by the way. He's no winner.
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
If you have to tell people not to believe their eyes about a coach you should light yourself on fire and fuck off and die.
Hope this helps.
Tedford likes to pound the cock.
This makes sense coming from Pumpy.
Tedford had a huge article written about how he used everything he liked from watching other teams. The result was no identity, a huge playbook and confused players.
I've seen some of the worst two minute offenses under Peterman. Players have often looked confused and struggled to line up. We have aj delay of games even though we don't huddle.
Open your fucking eyes sometime.
The P,R,P 3 and out is the most predictable bullshit on the planet and pisses me off more than any other kind. I would bet the basement Smith leads the country in that category.