Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tedford likes to pound the rock...
Comments
-
I thought the thread title was:
Tedford likes to pound the cock.
This makes sense coming from Pumpy. -
This is why you're a shit poster and an annoying doog. Every fucking play in the history of football looks good drawn up. Having your players execute, calling plays they can execute, calling the right plays at the right time... All of that goes into whether the play calling is good or bad.Tequilla said:
Let's be really honest ...RoadDawg55 said:
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.Tequilla said:
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
How's that working out for Romar?
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
Tedford had a huge article written about how he used everything he liked from watching other teams. The result was no identity, a huge playbook and confused players.
I've seen some of the worst two minute offenses under Peterman. Players have often looked confused and struggled to line up. We have aj delay of games even though we don't huddle.
Open your fucking eyes sometime. -
HurtfulRoadDawg55 said:
This is why you're a shit poster and an annoying doog. Every fucking play in the history of football looks good drawn up. Having your players execute, calling plays they can execute, calling the right plays at the right time... All of that goes into whether the play calling is good or bad.Tequilla said:
Let's be really honest ...RoadDawg55 said:
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.Tequilla said:
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
How's that working out for Romar?
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
Tedford had a huge article written about how he used everything he liked from watching other teams. The result was no identity, a huge playbook and confused players.
I've seen some of the worst two minute offenses under Peterman. Players have often looked confused and struggled to line up. We have aj delay of games even though we don't huddle.
Open your fucking eyes sometime.
-
@HeretoBeatmyChest is there an advanced metric that calculates the amount of times an OC has a Pass, Run, Pass 3 and out with a thousand yard rusher in the backfield?
The P,R,P 3 and out is the most predictable bullshit on the planet and pisses me off more than any other kind. I would bet the basement Smith leads the country in that category. -
-
-
Why is his dick brown but his face and hands are pale af? Does he sexually identify as transracial?PurpleJ said: -
I do. I identify as having a BBC on a white man's body.
-
I didn't realize that was you. Shouldn't the hat say J and he be smoking a fatty?PurpleJ said:I do. I identify as having a BBC on a white man's body.
-
Pretty sure Tequilla is an SMU fan posing as a TCU fan just to make Baylor look bad.RoadDawg55 said:
This is why you're a shit poster and an annoying doog. Every fucking play in the history of football looks good drawn up. Having your players execute, calling plays they can execute, calling the right plays at the right time... All of that goes into whether the play calling is good or bad.Tequilla said:
Let's be really honest ...RoadDawg55 said:
Good point. I totally forgot how much better Tedford and Peterman's offenses performed in their latter years.Tequilla said:
Good point ... the coaches should be less analytical and more of a just let the athletes play kind of coach ...RoadDawg55 said:The problem with Tedford is he's an over analytical piece of shit like the UW head coach has shown to be. Their playbooks have gotten more and more complex over the years.
I guess I would be somewhat happy at the thought of Smith being gone.
How's that working out for Romar?
If the plays work, the play calling is great. When they don't, it sucks.
You can deep dive the why all anybody wants, but I think it is very easy to conclude that the UW offense this should be the best Pete has had here in 3 years and the results should support that.
Tedford had a huge article written about how he used everything he liked from watching other teams. The result was no identity, a huge playbook and confused players.
I've seen some of the worst two minute offenses under Peterman. Players have often looked confused and struggled to line up. We have aj delay of games even though we don't huddle.
Open your fucking eyes sometime.
