Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
John Oliver Demolishes Serial Liar Donald Trump, Launches Campaign To #MakeDonaldDrumpfAgain
Comments
-
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.PurpleJ said:
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH -
The only thing J knows about unfavorables is that he heard they're socialistOZONE said:
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.PurpleJ said:
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH -
Maybe I just said that to bait someone into a response. Looks like it worked.OZONE said:
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.PurpleJ said:
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
-
Trump sucks. Hillary sucks.
Feel the Bern. -
What a special day to be a Rush Limbaugh dick sucking conservative that posts here. This just confirms (in your minds) all of the drivel that you guys suck out of his ass.
-
The Saudis have given millions to the Clinton Foundation, including while Hills was SOS. The Saudis hate Trump.
Yet our sky pilot Ozone is still backing Hillary. Doesn't make sense. -
Maybe I just started this thread to bait some doogs into a response. Looks like it worked.PurpleJ said:
Maybe I just said that to bait someone into a response. Looks like it worked.OZONE said:
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.PurpleJ said:
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH -
A little more crispOZONE said:PurpleJ said:
Maybe I just said that to bait someone into a response. Looks like it worked.OZONE said:
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.PurpleJ said:
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTHMaybe I just started this thread to bait some doogs into a response. Looks like it worked.You win -
Sounds like Trump may be a polarizing figure.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
-
Purp doesn't win anything.greenblood said:
A little more crispOZONE said:PurpleJ said:
Maybe I just said that to bait someone into a response. Looks like it worked.OZONE said:
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.PurpleJ said:
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTHMaybe I just started this thread to bait some doogs into a response. Looks like it worked.You win
