Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.
The only thing J knows about unfavorables is that he heard they're socialist
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.
Maybe I just said that to bait someone into a response. Looks like it worked.
What a special day to be a Rush Limbaugh dick sucking conservative that posts here. This just confirms (in your minds) all of the drivel that you guys suck out of his ass.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.
Maybe I just said that to bait someone into a response. Looks like it worked.
Maybe I just started this thread to bait some doogs into a response. Looks like it worked.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.
Maybe I just said that to bait someone into a response. Looks like it worked.
Maybe I just started this thread to bait some doogs into a response. Looks like it worked. You win
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
Given that you had never heard of it before this thread, I'm sure your analysis is spot on.
Maybe I just said that to bait someone into a response. Looks like it worked.
Maybe I just started this thread to bait some doogs into a response. Looks like it worked. You win
Comments
Feel the Bern.
Yet our sky pilot Ozone is still backing Hillary. Doesn't make sense.