Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills
It is being said about Hills, not her party. The important difference is that Trump's negatives are higher than even Hillary's are.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills
It is being said about Hills, not her party. The important difference is that Trump's negatives are higher than even Hillary's are.
The people I know saying it have voted D for a long time. HondaFS isn't one of them. Hope this helps.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills
It is being said about Hills, not her party. The important difference is that Trump's negatives are higher than even Hillary's are.
The people I know saying it have voted D for a long time. HondaFS isn't one of them. Hope this helps.
Turn on any news channel, where you will see every major news outlet saying it as well.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.
Yeah, why would you get educated on a topic you are arguing?
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.
Yeah, why would you get educated on a topic you are arguing?
Relative to you, I have all that I need. Trust me that's not a high bar.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.
Yeah, why would you get educated on a topic you are arguing?
Relative to you, I have all that I need. Trust me that's not a high bar.
That's all your come back is? Come on, come with something better. Anything. Cause your response to me calling you stupid was "oh yeah, you are more stupid".
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.
Yeah, why would you get educated on a topic you are arguing?
Relative to you, I have all that I need. Trust me that's not a high bar.
That's all your come back is? Come on, come with something better. Anything. Cause your response to me calling you stupid was "oh yeah, you are more stupid".
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
I've used the unfavorable stats against Hillary to defend Bernie so I can confirm this is true.
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.
I've used the unfavorable stats against Hillary to defend Bernie so I can confirm this is true.
Thing is that unfavorables are usually only important in the general, so you may still be right.
Comments
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
HTH back at you.