Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
John Oliver Demolishes Serial Liar Donald Trump, Launches Campaign To #MakeDonaldDrumpfAgain
Comments
-
Fox isn't news
-
I get all my news from NaturalNews.
-
I get mine from AllNaturals
-
I get my news from Gay Star News.
-
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
-
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
-
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH -
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps. -
It is being said about Hills, not her party. The important difference is that Trump's negatives are higher than even Hillary's are.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about HillsOZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH -
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
