Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
John Oliver Demolishes Serial Liar Donald Trump, Launches Campaign To #MakeDonaldDrumpfAgain
Comments
-
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.2001400ex said:
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps. -
The people I know saying it have voted D for a long time. HondaFS isn't one of them. Hope this helps.OZONE said:
It is being said about Hills, not her party. The important difference is that Trump's negatives are higher than even Hillary's are.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about HillsOZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH -
Turn on any news channel, where you will see every major news outlet saying it as well.pawz said:
The people I know saying it have voted D for a long time. HondaFS isn't one of them. Hope this helps.OZONE said:
It is being said about Hills, not her party. The important difference is that Trump's negatives are higher than even Hillary's are.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about HillsOZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
HTH back at you. -
Yeah, why would you get educated on a topic you are arguing?pawz said:
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.2001400ex said:
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps. -
Relative to you, I have all that I need. Trust me that's not a high bar.2001400ex said:
Yeah, why would you get educated on a topic you are arguing?pawz said:
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.2001400ex said:
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps. -
That's all your come back is? Come on, come with something better. Anything. Cause your response to me calling you stupid was "oh yeah, you are more stupid".pawz said:
Relative to you, I have all that I need. Trust me that's not a high bar.2001400ex said:
Yeah, why would you get educated on a topic you are arguing?pawz said:
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.2001400ex said:
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps. -
2001400ex said:
That's all your come back is? Come on, come with something better. Anything. Cause your response to me calling you stupid was "oh yeah, you are more stupid".pawz said:
Relative to you, I have all that I need. Trust me that's not a high bar.2001400ex said:
Yeah, why would you get educated on a topic you are arguing?pawz said:
You don't possess awareness, therefore your poont is mute.2001400ex said:
Do you have awareness of open primaries? I'd look into it and look into Trump's record in closed primaries.pawz said:
I know how you love irony. But you do know the exact same is being said about Hills and her party?OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
The difference being that people are coming out in droves to vote Trump.
Hope this helps.
-
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
-
I've used the unfavorable stats against Hillary to defend Bernie so I can confirm this is true.PurpleJ said:
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH -
Thing is that unfavorables are usually only important in the general, so you may still be right.allpurpleallgold said:
I've used the unfavorable stats against Hillary to defend Bernie so I can confirm this is true.PurpleJ said:
Sounds like a stat that a loser would point to if things weren't going their way.OZONE said:
Negatives are measures used by predictive analytics professionals in their effort to look at a likely outcome for an election.PurpleJ said:
The fuck are negatives? The only thing that counts is whether you win or not.OZONE said:
Do you have any source that refutes the fact that Trump has the highest negatives of any of the leading candidates out there?sarktastic said:Fox isn't news
The fact that so many registered Republicans have said they will not for Trump if he gets the nomination, is an example of why this particular measure of negatives is so interesting to political prognosticators, from both sides of the political news spectrum.
HTH
