Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who Do You Side With...?

24

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Cruz, Paul, Rubio.

    Ps, ISAFNRC.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    edited February 2016
    The candidate matching is a complete joke. Rand Paul @ 86% but then followed by Ted Cruz at 79%? Those two candidates have nowhere near that much in common. Right now, I like Gary Johnson, Paul, and Trump for different reasons. Trump's personality is by far the best.

    I also found that a lot of the questions weren't really answerable because they pertained to certain government concepts and roles that I don't believe should exist in the first place, so if there's no option to choose that, I can't answer how we should handle that particular situation.

    These are better:

    Small Government vs Big Government

    You side extremely towards “Small Government”, meaning you very strongly believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. This theme is somewhat important to you.

    Capitalism vs Socialism

    You side extremely towards “Capitalism”, meaning you very strongly support an economic system that features private ownership of wealth. This theme is somewhat important to you.


    Regulation vs Deregulation

    You side strongly towards “Deregulation”, meaning you strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.

    Multiculturalism vs Assimilation

    You side strongly towards “Multiculturalism”, meaning you strongly believe we should celebrate and embrace cultural diversity. This theme is somewhat important to you.

    Laissez-faire vs Keynesian

    You side moderately towards “Laissez-faire”, meaning you believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. This theme is somewhat important to you.

    Traditional vs Progressive

    You side moderately towards “Progressive”, meaning you believe we should be a nation that values personal freedom, expression, and diversity. This theme is somewhat important to you.

    Collectivism vs Individualism

    You side moderately towards “Individualism”, meaning you support free market policies that create opportunity for personal liberty and success. This theme is somewhat important to you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    PurpleJ said:

    I side with give us better fucking candidates.

    If I'm elected president, I promise we will have better candidates. Vote for me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    doogsinparadise said:

    Lol at the ~80% of Libertarians against mandatory vaccinations.

    I get this argument. But think about it...violence and coersion aren't the only means of influencing people to do something. Easily more than 80% of libertarians believe that children should be vaccinated.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    100% Attack Helicopter
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Fenderbender123 said:



    I also found that a lot of the questions weren't really answerable because they pertained to certain government concepts and roles that I don't believe should exist in the first place, so if there's no option to choose that, I can't answer how we should handle that particular situation.

    Apparently you missed the write in option.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    Cruz
    Carson
    Rubio
    Trump


    Reality

    Kasich
    Rubio
    Trump
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    TheGlove said:

    Fenderbender123 said:



    I also found that a lot of the questions weren't really answerable because they pertained to certain government concepts and roles that I don't believe should exist in the first place, so if there's no option to choose that, I can't answer how we should handle that particular situation.

    Apparently you missed the write in option.
    I didn't miss it, I just figured that there wasn't a team of political science experts at hand ready to read, analyze, and apply a score to what I wrote in.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Cruz, Paul, Rubio.

    Ps, ISAFNRC.
    image

    Yes we desperately need to prevent those cases of voter fraud that don't exist.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Fenderbender123 said:

    TheGlove said:

    Fenderbender123 said:



    I also found that a lot of the questions weren't really answerable because they pertained to certain government concepts and roles that I don't believe should exist in the first place, so if there's no option to choose that, I can't answer how we should handle that particular situation.

    Apparently you missed the write in option.
    I didn't miss it, I just figured that there wasn't a team of political science experts at hand ready to read, analyze, and apply a score to what I wrote in.
    Well duh.

    If these answers are not satisfactory, you can “submit your own stance”. Submitting your own stance will not match any candidates but will allow us to review popular stances, match them to the candidates, and add them as an official stance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2016
    allpurpleallgold said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Cruz, Paul, Rubio.

    Ps, ISAFNRC.
    image

    Yes we desperately need to prevent those cases of voter fraud that don't exist.
    You promise people aren't breaking the law? Works for me ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,052
    Fenderbender123 said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    Lol at the ~80% of Libertarians against mandatory vaccinations.

    I get this argument. But think about it...violence and coersion aren't the only means of influencing people to do something. Easily more than 80% of libertarians believe that children should be vaccinated.
    I believe kids should get vaccinated because kids, if not coat-hangered in the third trimester, should be given a chance to live. I don't need the fucking government to tell me that.

    But I do need the fucking government to make all those dumbfucks who SHOULD have coathangered their babies and don't like their kids living longer to get theirs vaccinated so I"m not just paying for their WIC program AND their healthcare more than absolutely necessary.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    RaceBannon said:

    My hits may be the least surprising. I did go strongly in favor of photo ID to vote in honor of collegdoog

    89% Cruz
    88% Trump
    87% Rubio
    82% Rand
    80% Carson
    78% Jeb
    31% Hilary
    30% Feeling the Bern

    Flip Cruz and Trump and you pretty much have my preference in order

    I just want to see the current political world burn

    Not surprising that a frustrated liberal like yourself would like Trump, but Cruz?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    ThomasFremont said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    95% Feelin the Bern.

    So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck you
    Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.

    Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.

    Is it Friday yet?
    Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?

    Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.

    I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Tequilla said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    95% Feelin the Bern.

    So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck you
    Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.

    Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.

    Is it Friday yet?
    Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?

    Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.

    I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part.
    Sounds like you love Big Brother.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    allpurpleallgold said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Cruz, Paul, Rubio.

    Ps, ISAFNRC.
    image

    Yes we desperately need to prevent those cases of voter fraud that don't exist. </

    https://youtu.be/ROj18U56iE4
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    I got 100% Fuck All These Assholes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,834 Founders Club
    doogsinparadise said:

    RaceBannon said:

    My hits may be the least surprising. I did go strongly in favor of photo ID to vote in honor of collegdoog

    89% Cruz
    88% Trump
    87% Rubio
    82% Rand
    80% Carson
    78% Jeb
    31% Hilary
    30% Feeling the Bern

    Flip Cruz and Trump and you pretty much have my preference in order

    I just want to see the current political world burn

    Not surprising that a frustrated liberal like yourself would like Trump, but Cruz?
    I don't like Cruz personally, he is not my kind of candidate. I just answered the questions. But if Cruz is the nominee he gets my vote
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    ThomasFremont said:

    Tequilla said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    95% Feelin the Bern.

    So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck you
    Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.

    Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.

    Is it Friday yet?
    Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?

    Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.

    I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part.
    Sounds like you love Big Brother.
    I'm actually a small government guy ...

    But when it comes to my two biggest interests in government, it is economy and security. And when it comes to making sure that our borders are secure and that our citizens are safe, I'm very uncompromising.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    edited February 2016
    Thinking one case proves there are more cases. This is the generation with all those critical thinking skills I've been hearing about.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Tequilla said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    95% Feelin the Bern.

    So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck you
    Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.

    Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.

    Is it Friday yet?
    Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?

    Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.

    I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part.
    If you think the NSA even cares a cunt hair about your rights, then you're seriously retarded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,834 Founders Club
    The same arguments against the NSA work remarkably well against gun control
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter