Would you Bloom for Michael?
As I've gathered, he will definitely run if Bernie Sanders wins the Dem nomination and Trump wins the GOP nomination. If Hildabeast wins the Dem nomination, I'm guessing he will still run.
What the USA needs is an intelligent / non messiah President with successful executive experience in both the private and public arenas. Bloomberg has both and negates Trump's wealth because he is also a billionaire.
Does anyone else seem him as potentially the prettiest girl in a room full of fuglies?
Comments
-
Unlike Obama, who has a fuller understanding of history and attempts to govern with according restraint, Bloomberg actually is on the authoritarian end of the liberal spectrum and has a long record of pushing for the sort of nanny-state regulations that this board claims to despise. So no, I would not be interested in voting for a "radical centrist" who would see his primary mandate as ceding economic control to the corporate sector, while at the same pushing a "progressive" agenda of restricting the size of sodas and places where you can smoke. He's the Epcot Centre of politicians.
-
Bloomberg is boring as fuck. And no hot wife.
The world needs a Trump/Putin dick measuring contest. -
I don't disagree with you on Bloomberg, he has some pretty fucked up libtarded ideas. He is an ardent and faithful practitioner of the religion of anthropogenic global warming and is a huge supporter of nanny state polices. Describing him as a "radical centrist" is spot on, but Obama has used his magic phone and magic pen to become among the most authoritarian presidents we've endured.doogsinparadise said:Unlike Obama, who has a fuller understanding of history and attempts to govern with according restraint,
.....Bloomberg actually is on the authoritarian end of the liberal spectrum and has a long record of pushing for the sort of nanny-state regulations that this board claims to despise. So no, I would not be interested in voting for a "radical centrist" who would see his primary mandate as ceding economic control to the corporate sector, while at the same pushing a "progressive" agenda of restricting the size of sodas and places where you can smoke. He's the Epcot Centre of politicians. -
Obama is no Nixon.
-
Nixon was a great liberal president
-
I'd take him back.RaceBannon said:Nixon was a great liberal president
-
Holy shit you need a history lesson.Southerndawg said:
I don't disagree with you on Bloomberg, he has some pretty fucked up libtarded ideas. He is an ardent and faithful practitioner of the religion of anthropogenic global warming and is a huge supporter of nanny state polices. Describing him as a "radical centrist" is spot on, but Obama has used his magic phone and magic pen to become among the most authoritarian presidents we've endured.doogsinparadise said:Unlike Obama, who has a fuller understanding of history and attempts to govern with according restraint,
.....Bloomberg actually is on the authoritarian end of the liberal spectrum and has a long record of pushing for the sort of nanny-state regulations that this board claims to despise. So no, I would not be interested in voting for a "radical centrist" who would see his primary mandate as ceding economic control to the corporate sector, while at the same pushing a "progressive" agenda of restricting the size of sodas and places where you can smoke. He's the Epcot Centre of politicians. -
if it were Trump Sanders I would vote for him in a second
-
If Trump gets the GOP nomination I'll be voting libertarian again.dhdawg said:if it were Trump Sanders I would vote for him in a second
-
if trump wins the GOP nomination and there isn't a legitimate 3rd party candidate I would vote sanders, hope the GOP keeps control of congress, hope nothing happens and wait for 2020.
