Would you Bloom for Michael?

BennyBeaver

Southerndawg said:

2001400ex said:

Southerndawg said:

doogsinparadise said:

Unlike Obama, who has a fuller understanding of history and attempts to govern with according restraint,


.....Bloomberg actually is on the authoritarian end of the liberal spectrum and has a long record of pushing for the sort of nanny-state regulations that this board claims to despise. So no, I would not be interested in voting for a "radical centrist" who would see his primary mandate as ceding economic control to the corporate sector, while at the same pushing a "progressive" agenda of restricting the size of sodas and places where you can smoke. He's the Epcot Centre of politicians.

I don't disagree with you on Bloomberg, he has some pretty fucked up libtarded ideas. He is an ardent and faithful practitioner of the religion of anthropogenic global warming and is a huge supporter of nanny state polices. Describing him as a "radical centrist" is spot on, but Obama has used his magic phone and magic pen to become among the most authoritarian presidents we've endured.

Holy shit you need a history lesson.

Such a good little lap dog, Hondo




Link: Obama unilaterally acts


"..........Please don't complain later that you didn't see it coming. As always, Mr. Obama states publicly what his intentions are. He is doing that now. Toward the end of his speech last week in Jacksonville, Fla., he said: "So where I can act on my own, I'm going to act on my own. I won't wait for Congress." .....

........... The political left, historically inclined by ideological belief to public policy that is imposed rather than legislated, will support Mr. Obama's expansion of authority. The rest of us should not."

That was written in 2013. Since then Obama has used his magic phone and magic pen over and over again to circumvent the legislative process and impose his policies. You like his policies, so you continue to lick his taint and gargle his semen, ignoring the inherent problem with a runaway president overstepping the boundaries of his authority. The left in general have no problem with this since it is their guy ramming his policies down the throats of the American People. However, the middle and right have issued their objections. Republicans have taken over both houses of congress in large part due to frustration amongst the voting population over your self appointed "king's" actions. We'll see how this plays out in 2016.

FS. You and the article. FS.

Southerndawg

FO, G

BennyBeaver

Southerndawg said:

FO, G

I only read the headline.

ThomasFremont

Southerndawg said:

2001400ex said:

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php

Education.

I like to pretend all presidential executive orders are the same, that's what I like to do.

You mean like interning an entire race of people, even if they are American citizens?

RaceBannon

ThomasFremont said:

Southerndawg said:

2001400ex said:

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php

Education.

I like to pretend all presidential executive orders are the same, that's what I like to do.

You mean like interning an entire race of people, even if they are American citizens?

FDR was a tuff liberal

GrundleStiltzkin

PurpleThrobber said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Less executive orders than every president since Grover Cleveland = Stalin

If you're going to bash William McKinley, I am the fuck out.

*Denali

2001400ex

Southerndawg said:

2001400ex said:

Southerndawg said:

doogsinparadise said:

Unlike Obama, who has a fuller understanding of history and attempts to govern with according restraint,


.....Bloomberg actually is on the authoritarian end of the liberal spectrum and has a long record of pushing for the sort of nanny-state regulations that this board claims to despise. So no, I would not be interested in voting for a "radical centrist" who would see his primary mandate as ceding economic control to the corporate sector, while at the same pushing a "progressive" agenda of restricting the size of sodas and places where you can smoke. He's the Epcot Centre of politicians.

I don't disagree with you on Bloomberg, he has some pretty fucked up libtarded ideas. He is an ardent and faithful practitioner of the religion of anthropogenic global warming and is a huge supporter of nanny state polices. Describing him as a "radical centrist" is spot on, but Obama has used his magic phone and magic pen to become among the most authoritarian presidents we've endured.

Holy shit you need a history lesson.

Such a good little lap dog, Hondo




Link: Obama unilaterally acts


"..........Please don't complain later that you didn't see it coming. As always, Mr. Obama states publicly what his intentions are. He is doing that now. Toward the end of his speech last week in Jacksonville, Fla., he said: "So where I can act on my own, I'm going to act on my own. I won't wait for Congress." .....

........... The political left, historically inclined by ideological belief to public policy that is imposed rather than legislated, will support Mr. Obama's expansion of authority. The rest of us should not."

That was written in 2013. Since then Obama has used his magic phone and magic pen over and over again to circumvent the legislative process and impose his policies. You like his policies, so you continue to lick his taint and gargle his semen, ignoring the inherent problem with a runaway president overstepping the boundaries of his authority. The left in general have no problem with this since it is their guy ramming his policies down the throats of the American People. However, the middle and right have issued their objections. Republicans have taken over both houses of congress in large part due to frustration amongst the voting population over your self appointed "king's" actions. We'll see how this plays out in 2016.

This is the FS post of the year. I say some stupid shit, but I'm stringing someone along. You actually believe this. That the right wing would issue objections over bullshit their guy did. The right still says going into Iraq, tax cuts, sending checks to every taxpayer, etc. were the right things to do.

And to the second bolded item. Gerrymandering is mostly why Congress is Republican. Like in 2012, more people voted for Democrats that Republicans in the house, yet the house ended up with more seats. Why is that?

doogsinparadise

Bloomberg, who expanded and legitimized stop and frisk? That Bloomberg? Some liberal.

RaceBannon

doogsinparadise said:

Bloomberg, who expanded and legitimized stop and frisk? That Bloomberg? Some liberal.

Stop and frisk saves more lives than back ground checks

doogsinparadise

Broken windows had/has potential, but it wasn't the reason the homicide rate has been dropping since the early 90s, and at the expense of thousands of people's civil rights. It certainly isn't the liberal policy.