Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Would you Bloom for Michael?
Comments
-
Having the Glenn Beck crowd against you is a positive for Trump
-
It's not just the Glenn Beck crowd, long time traditional conservatives and establishment GOP have been after him as well, but your point is valid. I would say though that that positive is more true for the segment of the population that would never vote republican, and that that segment loves, in a trolling sense, the Palin endorsement.RaceBannon said:Having the Glenn Beck crowd against you is a positive for Trump
-
Now compare that to a country run by hillary or sanders.Swaye said:A vote for Bloomberg is a vote for the nanny state and more gun control. Pass.
-
We need some common sense profil... er, uh stop and frisk laws.doogsinparadise said:Bloomberg, who expanded and legitimized stop and frisk? That Bloomberg? Some liberal.
-
And like (mostly) freeing another. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as an EO.ThomasFremont said:
You mean like interning an entire race of people, even if they are American citizens?Southerndawg said:
I like to pretend all presidential executive orders are the same, that's what I like to do.2001400ex said:
I know you libtards see nothing wrong with Obama legislating with his phone and pen, but that is the very definition of authoritarian. It's not the number of EOs he's written, it's their content and intent. He himself declared that he took action to rewrite immigration law via EO as a means around congress, which is clearly an unconstitutional use and a massive over reach of power. I expect this concept to elude HondoFS , but some of you referring to yourselves as "liberal" should learn what that term really means before latching onto it. -
If it's unconstitutional, and Congress is Republican and clearly willing and able to open investigations on Democrats. Then why haven't they tried Obama for unconstitutional executive orders?Southerndawg said:
And like (mostly) freeing another. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as an EO.ThomasFremont said:
You mean like interning an entire race of people, even if they are American citizens?Southerndawg said:
I like to pretend all presidential executive orders are the same, that's what I like to do.2001400ex said:
I know you libtards see nothing wrong with Obama legislating with his phone and pen, but that is the very definition of authoritarian. It's not the number of EOs he's written, it's their content and intent. He himself declared that he took action to rewrite immigration law via EO as a means around congress, which is clearly an unconstitutional use and a massive over reach of power. I expect this concept to elude HondoFS , but some of you referring to yourselves as "liberal" should learn what that term really means before latching onto it.
Get a clue. -
Cruz won't get the nomination, the party hates him more than Trump. It's either Trump or whoever emerges from the establishment group (probably Rubio).Southerndawg said:
Bloomberg certainly has the executive experience the lawmakers in the field lack. I do think, though, it will take the realistic prospect of a Trump v Sanders general election for him to get into the race, and I still don't see that happening. IMO, Hillary will win the democrat party nomination, and most likely, Cruz will win the republican nomination.HFNY said:IMHO, Bloomberg is the 2nd most qualified candidate after Kasich.
The country needs a smart, moderate president who can work with Congress and yet the brain-dead can't stop looking at Trump / Sanders
-
I don't disagree, you certainly could be right, though the establishment is bashing Rubio too, and Trump is acting more petulent than usual. Recent polls are showing he and Cruz are even in Iowa. At least we'll soon see where that goes. What a fucked up election cycle, for both parties.dnc said:
Cruz won't get the nomination, the party hates him more than Trump. It's either Trump or whoever emerges from the establishment group (probably Rubio).Southerndawg said:
Bloomberg certainly has the executive experience the lawmakers in the field lack. I do think, though, it will take the realistic prospect of a Trump v Sanders general election for him to get into the race, and I still don't see that happening. IMO, Hillary will win the democrat party nomination, and most likely, Cruz will win the republican nomination.HFNY said:IMHO, Bloomberg is the 2nd most qualified candidate after Kasich.
The country needs a smart, moderate president who can work with Congress and yet the brain-dead can't stop looking at Trump / Sanders -
Actually, the Emancipation Proclamation didn't "mostly" free the slaves, since it had no affect on the South, where the vast majority of slaves lived.Southerndawg said:
And like (mostly) freeing another. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as an EO.ThomasFremont said:
You mean like interning an entire race of people, even if they are American citizens?Southerndawg said:
I like to pretend all presidential executive orders are the same, that's what I like to do.2001400ex said:
I know you libtards see nothing wrong with Obama legislating with his phone and pen, but that is the very definition of authoritarian. It's not the number of EOs he's written, it's their content and intent. He himself declared that he took action to rewrite immigration law via EO as a means around congress, which is clearly an unconstitutional use and a massive over reach of power. I expect this concept to elude HondoFS , but some of you referring to yourselves as "liberal" should learn what that term really means before latching onto it.
But other than that, good poont.
