Would you Bloom for Michael?

Kaepsknee

ThomasFremont said:

Southerndawg said:

ThomasFremont said:

Southerndawg said:

2001400ex said:

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php

Education.

I like to pretend all presidential executive orders are the same, that's what I like to do.

You mean like interning an entire race of people, even if they are American citizens?

And like (mostly) freeing another. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as an EO.

I know you libtards see nothing wrong with Obama legislating with his phone and pen, but that is the very definition of authoritarian. It's not the number of EOs he's written, it's their content and intent. He himself declared that he took action to rewrite immigration law via EO as a means around congress, which is clearly an unconstitutional use and a massive over reach of power. I expect this concept to elude HondoFS , but some of you referring to yourselves as "liberal" should learn what that term really means before latching onto it.

Actually, the Emancipation Proclamation didn't "mostly" free the slaves, since it had no affect on the South, where the vast majority of slaves lived.

But other than that, good poont.

Still doesn't explain what happened to the White Slaves.

RaceBannon

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

Southerndawg said:

ThomasFremont said:

Southerndawg said:

2001400ex said:

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php

Education.

I like to pretend all presidential executive orders are the same, that's what I like to do.

You mean like interning an entire race of people, even if they are American citizens?

And like (mostly) freeing another. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as an EO.

I know you libtards see nothing wrong with Obama legislating with his phone and pen, but that is the very definition of authoritarian. It's not the number of EOs he's written, it's their content and intent. He himself declared that he took action to rewrite immigration law via EO as a means around congress, which is clearly an unconstitutional use and a massive over reach of power. I expect this concept to elude HondoFS , but some of you referring to yourselves as "liberal" should learn what that term really means before latching onto it.

Actually, the Emancipation Proclamation didn't "mostly" free the slaves, since it had no affect on the South, where the vast majority of slaves lived.

But other than that, good poont.

Still doesn't explain what happened to the White Slaves.

We (?) fucked up Rome good.

pawz

allpurpleallgold said:

HFNY said:

IMHO, Bloomberg is the 2nd most qualified candidate after Kasich.

The country needs a smart, moderate president who can work with Congress and yet the brain-dead can't stop looking at Trump / Sanders

Work with congress to do what? Anything that you work with congress on is going to be bullshit. The last thing this country needs is donor owned congress making a bunch of donor approved decisions. Shove shit down congresses throat. Trump/Sanders 2016.

The most important poast in this thread.

Congress has failed us far more than Dubya or the big zerO.

We desperately need someone to gouge out eyeballs and skullfuck Congress.

Trump/Sanders '16