PM to Pawz

Comments
-
Ass > tits -
*cough*
-
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again. -
we still love you
-
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again. -
Rush Limbaugh is all the evidence he needs.allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again. -
allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
One reply is not like the other2001400ex said:
Rush Limbaugh is all the evidence he needs.allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again. -
Perhaps I should reference natural news?RaceBannon said:allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
One reply is not like the other2001400ex said:
Rush Limbaugh is all the evidence he needs.allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again. -
Or just fuck off
-
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same? -
PurpleJ said:
Ass > tits -
By circumstantial evidence, you really mean bullshit, right?pawz said:
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
-
And why does he hang out with those retarded gorillas, as you called them? Because any one of them, if he asked them to, would take a fucking bat to your head, okay? It's called loyalty.AZDuck said:we still love you
-
dflea said:
By circumstantial evidence, you really mean bullshit, right?pawz said:
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same? -
Science already has the process you're requesting. It's called peer review.pawz said:
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same? -
A pox on you if you can't see the irony.pawz said:
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.allpurpleallgold said:
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.pawz said:I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same? -
Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.
-
46-18 since 2012, Two NFC titles, One Super Bowl, one Bevell FS call from two, 4 straight best defenses in points allowedPurpleJ said:Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.
so I'm saying who gives a fuck? -
You would blame the assistant.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
46-18 since 2012, Two NFC titles, One Super Bowl, one Bevell FS call from two, 4 straight best defenses in points allowedPurpleJ said:Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.
so I'm saying who gives a fuck? -
This is the definition of "Juicy Dumper".PurpleJ said:
Ass > tits -
Thanks for the input minion number 4allpurpleallgold said:
You would blame the assistant.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
46-18 since 2012, Two NFC titles, One Super Bowl, one Bevell FS call from two, 4 straight best defenses in points allowedPurpleJ said:Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.
so I'm saying who gives a fuck? -
we?AZDuck said:we still love you
-
How in the hell have there been over $2 BILLION in damages paid out?
Credible news source: reviewjournal.com/vin-suprynowicz/2-billion-paid-out-vaccine-injuries-kids
That's a fucking expensive sacred cow. -
PurpleJ said:
Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.
PM to structural engineers and demo experts: Building 7 and I would like to know how long it takes to "pull" a building? You know, from start to finish?
As always, the devil is in the details.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk
Credit to Pete Carroll, when given the opportunity, he fucking grilled a 3-4 star general about what he knew and when he knew it.
-
WTF vote for blaming Bevell. Pete's fault.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
46-18 since 2012, Two NFC titles, One Super Bowl, one Bevell FS call from two, 4 straight best defenses in points allowedPurpleJ said:Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.
so I'm saying who gives a fuck?
-
Because vaccine court is a joke.pawz said:How in the hell have there been over $2 BILLION in damages paid out?
Credible news source: reviewjournal.com/vin-suprynowicz/2-billion-paid-out-vaccine-injuries-kids
That's a fucking expensive sacred cow. -
allpurpleallgold said:
Because vaccine court is a joke.pawz said:How in the hell have there been over $2 BILLION in damages paid out?
Credible news source: reviewjournal.com/vin-suprynowicz/2-billion-paid-out-vaccine-injuries-kids
That's a fucking expensive sacred cow.
I'm all for reversing the law keeping Vaccine makers out of REAL court.
N'est-ce pas?
Either way, $2,000,000,000 is a LOT of damage. -
Did you ever hear of a cost/benefit analysis? What do you think the cost to the country would be if we stopped vaccinating kids?pawz said:allpurpleallgold said:
Because vaccine court is a joke.pawz said:How in the hell have there been over $2 BILLION in damages paid out?
Credible news source: reviewjournal.com/vin-suprynowicz/2-billion-paid-out-vaccine-injuries-kids
That's a fucking expensive sacred cow.
I'm all for reversing the law keeping Vaccine makers out of REAL court.
N'est-ce pas?
Either way, $2,000,000,000 is a LOT of damage.
You should really stop making fun of HondoFS, if you're going to insist on being a dumb cunt.
-
Made the top 5 at least.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Thanks for the input minion number 4allpurpleallgold said:
You would blame the assistant.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
46-18 since 2012, Two NFC titles, One Super Bowl, one Bevell FS call from two, 4 straight best defenses in points allowedPurpleJ said:Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.
so I'm saying who gives a fuck? -
If I was #blessed enough to have APAG as my minion, he would be number one.