PM to Pawz
Comments
-
I'm glad to see @brents has joined the thread.whatshouldicareabout said:@pawz what science classes have you taken and passed in college?
-
At no point in time was I referencing Stihl.dflea said:
Stihl likely paid some dumb cunt for cutting his sack off with a chain saw, so fuck off.pawz said:
Why would anybody pay-out $2 Billion dollars predicated on 'frivolous' or 'baseless' judgements?dflea said:
That's because they didn't want empty-headed fucktards like you continuously bringing frivolous, baseless lawsuits against the vaccine manufacturers.pawz said:
I think it's telling that the big money in play worked so hard to ensure the science doesn't have to hold up in real court.allpurpleallgold said:
And in what fucking universe does that money affect the science? More good evidence that you can't tell the difference between good and bad evidence.pawz said:allpurpleallgold said:
Because vaccine court is a joke.pawz said:How in the hell have there been over $2 BILLION in damages paid out?
Credible news source: reviewjournal.com/vin-suprynowicz/2-billion-paid-out-vaccine-injuries-kids
That's a fucking expensive sacred cow.
I'm all for reversing the law keeping Vaccine makers out of REAL court.
N'est-ce pas?
Either way, $2,000,000,000 is a LOT of damage.
Fuck o dear.
Answer: they wouldn't.
Therefore, somebody felt strong enough about the cases in question to determine a lack of frivolity and/or baselessness.
I apologize for wanting to know more. My bad. -
No - you were asking why people got payouts if they didn't deserve them.
I just fucking told you.
The courts should have taken sackless and sawed off his fuckin head, but instead he probably got a check from Stihl to go the fuck away.
You seem to be struggling here. Perhaps drimnking a fifth would help - or at least give you an excuse. -
At no point in time was I referencing Stihl. Please do stay on topic. It's material to the conversation.dflea said:No - you were asking why people got payouts if they didn't deserve them.
I just fucking told you.
The courts should have taken sackless and sawed off his fuckin head, but instead he probably got a check from Stihl to go the fuck away. -
Go fuck yourself - I don't give a fuck what you were referencing.
I'M referencing you being a stupid asshole, and that IS on topic. -
I'm just curious if you've ever been exposed to immunology, epidemiology, or even biology.pawz said:
I'm glad to see @brents has joined the thread.whatshouldicareabout said:@pawz what science classes have you taken and passed in college?
But, if you dodged even that question, like all my previous ones, I guess your strategy is akin to putting your hands over your ears and shouting at everyone loudly. -
As always, another pleasant discourse. It's too bad you can't stay on track, this is clearly a hot-button topic for you that may require closure.dflea said:Go fuck yourself - I don't give a fuck what you were referencing.
I'M referencing you being a stupid asshole, and that IS on topic.
My only regret is that I couldn't get you to drop the 'fucking goat' bomb. That would have been a success.
Have another jack-and-coke. Hold the coke. -
Here I thought you've been around long enough to know the @brents logical fallacy. I can explain it for you, if you like. And what it means in relation to this thread. LMKwhatshouldicareabout said:
I'm just curious if you've ever been exposed to immunology, epidemiology, or even biology.pawz said:
I'm glad to see @brents has joined the thread.whatshouldicareabout said:@pawz what science classes have you taken and passed in college?
But, if you dodged even that question, like all my previous ones, I guess your strategy is akin to putting your hands over your ears and shouting at everyone loudly.
Cheers. -
I'm pretty sure it's the jack and cokes that led to the tone of this discussion in the first place.pawz said:
As always, another pleasant discourse. It's too bad you can't stay on track, this is clearly a hot-button topic for you that may require closure.dflea said:Go fuck yourself - I don't give a fuck what you were referencing.
I'M referencing you being a stupid asshole, and that IS on topic.
My only regret is that I couldn't get you to drop the 'fucking goat' bomb. That would have been a success.
Have another jack-and-coke. Hold the coke.
*faggoty wink* -
Holy shit you got destroyed and you don't even realize it. Here's another example. The lady that spilled McDonald's coffee on her and win millions.pawz said:
As always, another pleasant discourse. It's too bad you can't stay on track, this is clearly a hot-button topic for you that may require closure.dflea said:Go fuck yourself - I don't give a fuck what you were referencing.
I'M referencing you being a stupid asshole, and that IS on topic.
My only regret is that I couldn't get you to drop the 'fucking goat' bomb. That would have been a success.
Have another jack-and-coke. Hold the coke.
The point he's making that's clearly lost on you, is that using settlements to show someone was right is fucktarded.



