Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to Pawz

AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
in Tug Tavern
@pawz

image
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1345

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,469 Founders Club
    *cough*
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,233 Founders Club
    I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

    It won't happen again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    we still love you
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    allpurpleallgold said:

    pawz said:

    I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

    It won't happen again.

    No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
    Rush Limbaugh is all the evidence he needs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    pawz said:

    I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

    It won't happen again.

    No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
    2001400ex said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    pawz said:

    I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

    It won't happen again.

    No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
    Rush Limbaugh is all the evidence he needs.
    One reply is not like the other
    Perhaps I should reference natural news?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,233 Founders Club
    allpurpleallgold said:

    pawz said:

    I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

    It won't happen again.

    No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
    I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.

    I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.

    You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,428 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    we still love you

    And why does he hang out with those retarded gorillas, as you called them? Because any one of them, if he asked them to, would take a fucking bat to your head, okay? It's called loyalty.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,233 Founders Club
    dflea said:

    pawz said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    pawz said:

    I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

    It won't happen again.

    No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
    I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.

    I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.

    You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
    By circumstantial evidence, you really mean bullshit, right?
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    pawz said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    pawz said:

    I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

    It won't happen again.

    No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
    I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.

    I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.

    You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
    Science already has the process you're requesting. It's called peer review.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    pawz said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    pawz said:

    I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

    It won't happen again.

    No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
    I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.

    I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.

    You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
    A pox on you if you can't see the irony.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,511 Founders Club
    Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,399 Founders Club
    edited January 2016
    PurpleJ said:

    Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.

    46-18 since 2012, Two NFC titles, One Super Bowl, one Bevell FS call from two, 4 straight best defenses in points allowed

    so I'm saying who gives a fuck?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Pete Carroll in an anti vaccine guy and 9/11 conspiracist. Enough said on that.

    46-18 since 2012, Two NFC titles, One Super Bowl, one Bevell FS call from two, 4 straight best defenses in points allowed

    so I'm saying who gives a fuck?
    You would blame the assistant.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    PurpleJ said:

    image

    Ass > tits

    This is the definition of "Juicy Dumper".
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.