I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
By circumstantial evidence, you really mean bullshit, right?
And why does he hang out with those retarded gorillas, as you called them? Because any one of them, if he asked them to, would take a fucking bat to your head, okay? It's called loyalty.
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
By circumstantial evidence, you really mean bullshit, right?
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
Science already has the process you're requesting. It's called peer review.
I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.
It won't happen again.
No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.
I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
AZDuck
Member Posts: 15,381
Comments
Ass > tits
It won't happen again.
I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.
You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?
so I'm saying who gives a fuck?