PM to Pawz

AZDuck

@pawz

PurpleJ

Ass > tits

RaceBannon

*cough*

pawz

I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

It won't happen again.

AZDuck

we still love you

allpurpleallgold

pawz said:

I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

It won't happen again.

No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.

2001400ex

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

It won't happen again.

No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.

Rush Limbaugh is all the evidence he needs.

RaceBannon

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

It won't happen again.

No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.

2001400ex said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

It won't happen again.

No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.

Rush Limbaugh is all the evidence he needs.

One reply is not like the other

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

It won't happen again.

No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.

2001400ex said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

It won't happen again.

No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.

Rush Limbaugh is all the evidence he needs.

One reply is not like the other

Perhaps I should reference natural news?

RaceBannon

Or just fuck off

pawz

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

I was wrong. It's heresy to suggest moderns medicine could be flawed and that our government works for the people to protect the people.

It won't happen again.

No one thinks modern medicine is perfect. All that we ask is that when you question it have a shred of decent evidence. The problem is that you have no understanding of what is and is not good evidence.

I brought forth evidence - albeit circumstantial - and everyone defended Vax like it was a sacred cow.

I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.

You wouldn't let bankers get away with this type of review. Why are you letting a different corpratocracy get away with essentially the same?