Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to Pawz

124»

Comments

  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    pawz said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    pawz said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    pawz said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    pawz said:

    So what if autism rates are off the charts and growing.

    So what if people are chasing opioid addiction untill they have Pennsylvania railroad track marks from their taint to their navel.

    So what if there is another movie theater shootout each week due to the deleterious effects of the over prescribed effects of psychotropic meds.

    So fucking what.

    Because medications make people live longer and have better quality of life?

    Is this really your argument?
    Are you calling the growth rates of living with autism (among others), living with addiction or more shoot-outs at Cinerama a better quality of living?

    Is this really your argument?



    Sure, you can say those issues are marginal. But that margin is growing. Exponentially.

    No more sacred cows.


    I can't believe you don't seem to give a fuck.
    Go ahead, show me the evidence.

    Remember all those threads you wanted me to remember your participation in?

    You find that shit.
    Huh?

    I asked you several question in other threads that went unanswered when I provided evidence dismissing your bullshit.

    You've never once produced anything to support your bullshit.

    Again, do you or do you not have evidence?
    You choose to dismiss 20 years and $2 billion in damage findings as inconsequential.

    I think we're done here.
    Jesus.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,470 Founders Club
    allpurpleallgold said:

    pawz said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    pawz said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    pawz said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    pawz said:

    So what if autism rates are off the charts and growing.

    So what if people are chasing opioid addiction untill they have Pennsylvania railroad track marks from their taint to their navel.

    So what if there is another movie theater shootout each week due to the deleterious effects of the over prescribed effects of psychotropic meds.

    So fucking what.

    Because medications make people live longer and have better quality of life?

    Is this really your argument?
    Are you calling the growth rates of living with autism (among others), living with addiction or more shoot-outs at Cinerama a better quality of living?

    Is this really your argument?



    Sure, you can say those issues are marginal. But that margin is growing. Exponentially.

    No more sacred cows.


    I can't believe you don't seem to give a fuck.
    Go ahead, show me the evidence.

    Remember all those threads you wanted me to remember your participation in?

    You find that shit.
    Huh?

    I asked you several question in other threads that went unanswered when I provided evidence dismissing your bullshit.

    You've never once produced anything to support your bullshit.

    Again, do you or do you not have evidence?
    You choose to dismiss 20 years and $2 billion in damage findings as inconsequential.

    I think we're done here.
    Jesus.
    CHRIST.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    This is still here?
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited January 2016






    I don't have the answers, but the issues needs real, independent review. Not review bought and paid for by the people with billions of dollars in revenues to protect.



    You mean like Global W.... er, uh, Climate Change?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    pawz said:



    You choose to dismiss 20 years and $2 billion in damage findings as inconsequential.

    I think we're done here.

    From a scientific perspective they are less than inconsequential.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter