Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

When Reasons Become Excuses.....

13567

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Tequilla said:

    Some of you fucks need to separate emotions from reading what you want to hear ...

    I don't think anybody is saying that Smith is doing a good job ... I'm not. I've been critical of the lack of identity from the offense (thoughts echoed by Kyle Benn). I've noted that even when Smith makes a solid play call, the execution isn't always matching (which often is tied to youth).

    There isn't going to be a mid-season firing. Carry the pitchforks all that you want ... not happening. He wasn't getting fired last year as he was going to get a 2nd year to prove whether he had the answers or not. I agree a lot of pressure on Petersen on how he manages this situation at season end and into the offseason as his recent track record leaves a bit to be desired.

    image
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    HuskyInAZ said:

    Some of those teams have a lot of cumulative starts because they played young guys and went through that fire.

    UCLA was young on offense in 2012 and 2013. Arizona was young last year. SC started 3 true Frosh on the OL last year.

    I think those squads got more out of the year than Peterson has.

    Agree. But did they have a true freshman at QB and less than average WRs?
    I don't think that alone explains 4 or 5 wins difference. WR production is largely systemic before the catch, talent after the catch IMO.

    With how poor the pac12 looks, and how competent the UW defense looks, I think you can't chalk up sub.500 ball simply to youth. Not winning 6 or 7 games after a disappointing year in 2014 I think speaks to a bigger issue.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,259

    Tequilla said:


    And, going on the theory that this is Petersen's offense and it isn't Smith's fault, then the idea would be that Petersen doesn't have the answers and needs to look to others for solutions, any change that gets made at this point is FS anyway.

    This may be the case.

    I'll automatically hate the next hire too. Until he proves that he can win.
    I've also compared a lot of what we're seeing right now with Petersen's first couple of years in the PAC to Patterson's first two years in the Big 12 at TCU. I see a ton of similarities. Patterson had to scrap everything he knew and stood for offensively which impacted what he was great at defensively because it wasn't working. He's reaping the rewards right now. Can Petersen do the same?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,551 Swaye's Wigwam
    That young OL was kicking the shit out of Cal in the running game last Saturday. They are young and bad, but Sark had some OL's that were as bad or worse. Greg Christine, Nick Wood, a freshman Shane Brostek, Atoe, Criste...
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,259

    That young OL was kicking the shit out of Cal in the running game last Saturday. They are young and bad, but Sark had some OL's that were as bad or worse. Greg Christine, Nick Wood, a freshman Shane Brostek, Atoe, Criste...

    You can build an offensive identity behind running the ball down hill, quick slants and comeback routes, the occasional boot & playaction plays, and an occasional play action leading to a deep shot down the field.

    Not only is the identity a problem, but trying to figure out what pieces are your most useful on offense and playing to those strengths is very lacking. Expecting a lot out of the WR is probably foolish because we have a lot of either JAGs or young players that lack consistency.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Tequilla said:

    That young OL was kicking the shit out of Cal in the running game last Saturday. They are young and bad, but Sark had some OL's that were as bad or worse. Greg Christine, Nick Wood, a freshman Shane Brostek, Atoe, Criste...

    You can build an offensive identity behind running the ball down hill, quick slants and comeback routes, the occasional boot & playaction plays, and an occasional play action leading to a deep shot down the field.

    Not only is the identity a problem, but trying to figure out what pieces are your most useful on offense and playing to those strengths is very lacking. Expecting a lot out of the WR is probably foolish because we have a lot of either JAGs or young players that lack consistency.
    Sounds like a coaching issue to me.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    Tequilla said:

    That young OL was kicking the shit out of Cal in the running game last Saturday. They are young and bad, but Sark had some OL's that were as bad or worse. Greg Christine, Nick Wood, a freshman Shane Brostek, Atoe, Criste...

    You can build an offensive identity behind running the ball down hill, quick slants and comeback routes, the occasional boot & playaction plays, and an occasional play action leading to a deep shot down the field.

    Not only is the identity a problem, but trying to figure out what pieces are your most useful on offense and playing to those strengths is very lacking. Expecting a lot out of the WR is probably foolish because we have a lot of either JAGs or young players that lack consistency.
    Sounds like a coaching issue to me.
    Quite honestly, I don't get what you are arguing about. He has acknowledged that coaching is the problem with a lack of identity. This whole back and forth is absolutely stoopid.

    The only difference between your two arguments is that one thinks it should be blown up right now and that Petersen isn't the guy, and the other wants to see what happens at the end of the season.

    Christ.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Tequilla said:

    That young OL was kicking the shit out of Cal in the running game last Saturday. They are young and bad, but Sark had some OL's that were as bad or worse. Greg Christine, Nick Wood, a freshman Shane Brostek, Atoe, Criste...

    You can build an offensive identity behind running the ball down hill, quick slants and comeback routes, the occasional boot & playaction plays, and an occasional play action leading to a deep shot down the field.

    Not only is the identity a problem, but trying to figure out what pieces are your most useful on offense and playing to those strengths is very lacking. Expecting a lot out of the WR is probably foolish because we have a lot of either JAGs or young players that lack consistency.
    Sounds like a coaching issue to me.
    Quite honestly, I don't get what you are arguing about. He has acknowledged that coaching is the problem with a lack of identity. This whole back and forth is absolutely stoopid.

    The only difference between your two arguments is that one thinks it should be blown up right now and that Petersen isn't the guy, and the other wants to see what happens at the end of the season.

    Christ.
    That is NOT the only difference. And I haven't said Petersen isn't the guy.

    Thanks for reading?
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    Tequilla said:

    That young OL was kicking the shit out of Cal in the running game last Saturday. They are young and bad, but Sark had some OL's that were as bad or worse. Greg Christine, Nick Wood, a freshman Shane Brostek, Atoe, Criste...

    You can build an offensive identity behind running the ball down hill, quick slants and comeback routes, the occasional boot & playaction plays, and an occasional play action leading to a deep shot down the field.

    Not only is the identity a problem, but trying to figure out what pieces are your most useful on offense and playing to those strengths is very lacking. Expecting a lot out of the WR is probably foolish because we have a lot of either JAGs or young players that lack consistency.
    Sounds like a coaching issue to me.
    Quite honestly, I don't get what you are arguing about. He has acknowledged that coaching is the problem with a lack of identity. This whole back and forth is absolutely stoopid.

    The only difference between your two arguments is that one thinks it should be blown up right now and that Petersen isn't the guy, and the other wants to see what happens at the end of the season.

    Christ.
    That is NOT the only difference. And I haven't said Petersen isn't the guy.

    Thanks for reading?
    Haven't been able to read every single post in the back and forth between you and others.

    What would you like to see done then? Just so we can get that out there in one spot I guess.