Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Roof Think Browning Should Start

24567

Comments

  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,823

    I'd rather have Browning play in 2019 than Browning play in 2015

    Thank you. It amazes me how few people understand this concept.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    I'd rather have Browning play in 2019 than Browning play in 2015

    If Browning is good, he should be gone before the 2019 season.

    HTH
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    dnc said:

    I just don't think Browning is 2-3 wins better than the alternatives. If he's 3 wins better I agree you play him.
    A lot of the thread is dealing in hypotheticals, which we don't do, but the margins for winning and losing are often so slim which is why the best guy has to play. Marginally better can be a 2-3 win difference.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896

    If Browning is good, he should be gone before the 2019 season.

    HTH
    DPOTM!!!!
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,826

    The 15 practices was the original, Lambo-generated/Baird-coveted, doog excuse for sucking. 'Why did we piss away the Rose Bowl in '95 and '96?' 'You have no idea the amount of development we lost in the underclass kids in the last 2 years without those 15 practices. Those make a huge difference.'

    Sort of like having a shit-for-brains coach also makes a huge difference: looking at you Lambo.

    It actually goes back even further than that to the ultimate doogism of all doogisms.

    #Sanctions #CostUsTwoBowels #Thats30Practices
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

    Yeah, the sanctions really fucking decimated us. Look at that '96 team: no talent at all.

    How can you expect to win without those practices?
    Way to give AoG (RIP) another option for his shitty pole.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    dnc said:

    The sad thing is I was young and doogpid and lapped up all that shit at the time.











    95 is going to be special!
    Honestly, that was when I realized Lambo was a fucktard. It was so obvious that talent was not our problem, coming from 21 ahead at half to tie USC 21-21 in the rain has nothing to fucking do with 30 practices. It has to do with a coach getting a tight asshole at half-time.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    If you didn't want to fire Lambo when Wheaton crossed midfield, you were a Doog.
    At that time I was not really dooging for Lambo, but I was trying to process everything. That '94 team should've been a 10 win team. We had a lot of talent, but the malaise had already clearly set in.

    Really the '94 Stanford game told you all you needed on Lambo. Also the all-white recruiting class could've given you a hint, too.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,310 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2015
    Bingo.

    Every time I think I know who will start, I return to the assumptions and hypotheticals pertaining to all of the options.

    Heck, we don't even know who the starting Right Tackle will be so it's that much harder to try to guess who will start @ BSU on September 4th.

    I will say this, unless Browning will have taken some big steps by September 4th, it's an awful lot to ask of a true frosh to go into hostile territory with a bunch of Bronco Fans pitching tent at the thought of returning ass-kicking they received to start the 2013 season.

    Also, it's not like we return 4 of 5 or 5 of 5 starters on the OL with our LT being a pre-season All Pac 12 choice; we only have 1 guy who has started more than 10 games and he was out this spring (RS-SR Dex Charles). The next guy has started 7 games (RS-So Coleman Shelton) and he also missed the spring. A guy who has started about 5 games over his career redshirted last year (RS-JR Brostek) and I am only hoping another guy who started a few games last year (RS-SR Tufunga) can make it to being average in his 5th year.

    Living in fantasy land, imagine yourself playing EA Sports College Football. I'd probably go with Wild Swede since he'd be less likely to get rattled, use him in the option game and then do play-action off of the running game, and lean on my reasonably talented D and good special teams to pull out a win.

    TSIO but also have to win the turnover battle and I don't know if starting a true frosh who isn't really a running threat is the best way to take care of the ball on offense.

    A lot of the thread is dealing in hypotheticals, which we don't do, but the margins for winning and losing are often so slim which is why the best guy has to play. Marginally better can be a 2-3 win difference.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,310 Standard Supporter
    Also Kellen Moore and Aaron Murray (the QBs to which Browning is most similar IMHO) both redshirted. Hard to think Browning won't.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,826
    I cannot wait for PuppyLoveLamboSpooge to find this thread.
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Browning is going to be the guy. He wasn't that far behind the others and with a lot more reps and a few live games he'll be at worst where the others are.

    Lindquist just doesn't have it. He's had three full years. He was terrible against a bad Hawaii team, missing guys that were wide open. Also, he was far enough behind Miles last year that he didn't come in for relief in any games despite Miles' shitty play.

    The biggest reason Browning will play this season is it gives UW the most upside next season without sacrificing much this year. He will be a lot better as a true soph than rs freshman.

    Goff played as a true freshman and his QBR the next year went from 53 to 75. Even Sefo at Colorado went from 54 to 60. Miles QBR was only 49 last year.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,310 Standard Supporter
    But do you mean:

    He's going to be the guy to start at BSU?

    Come in after halftime or at some point during the BSU game?

    Start against Sacramento State?

    Or start at some point in 2015?

    Browning is going to be the guy. He wasn't that far behind the others and with a lot more reps and a few live games he'll be at worst where the others are.

    Lindquist just doesn't have it. He's had three full years. He was terrible against a bad Hawaii team, missing guys that were wide open. Also, he was far enough behind Miles last year that he didn't come in for relief in any games despite Miles' shitty play.

    The biggest reason Browning will play this season is it gives UW the most upside next season without sacrificing much this year. He will be a lot better as a true soph than rs freshman.

    Goff played as a true freshman and his QBR the next year went from 53 to 75. Even Sefo at Colorado went from 54 to 60. Miles QBR was only 49 last year.

Sign In or Register to comment.