Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Roof Think Browning Should Start

1235»

Comments

  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Doogles said:

    brchco12 said:

    Doogles said:

    TTJ said:

    RavennaDawg said:

    Whomever gives us the best chance to win should play. Why is this so difficult?

    If Browning plays in 2015, he will be worlds better as a true soph in 2016 than he will as a rs-frosh. And he will be better in 2017, and 2018.

    No one has ever said "That guy would be a better player if only he had spent last year on the bench in stead of seeing the field."

    If Lindquist gives us the best chance to win, he should play.



    Riddle me this, shit-for-brains: how good was Saint Marques in 2001?
    I'll take this a little further. Cody Pickett stepped in and was one of Washington's most prolific passers in 2001. It's about recruiting great players and having them be ready. People forget the Tui got hurt in the Rose Bowl and it was Pickett who stepped in and helped keep that game in hand. You're either good or you're not.

    If Browning is the best guy, he needs to play. And Pete needs to recruit somebody who will be ready to take over in 2019 that's not named Browning regardless. I think Browning is the guy, but i'm in the minority in thinking that Lindquist still has some game in him.

    As mentioned before, the slightest improvement can be a 2-3 game difference. If Browning is worth those victories, it's better for the program to win 7-8 and go to a shit bowl and continue recruiting than go 4-5 and have serious doubts about the direction under Pete.
    2-2 for a whopping 11 yards, but still
    IIRC both throws came on the game sealing TD drive. He could have gone 0-2 for 0 yards and a punt and who knows, maybe we have nothing to talk about since 92.

    The point is he was ready to play. Last time we've had two NFL QBs on the roster at the same time.
    Why do you hate Picket and Stanback or Stanback and Jake. Before I get corrected, Stanback did play (at least practice) at QB for the Patriots.
    Is Browning the next Picket?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    haie said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    In the perfect world, in order of importance.....

    1. Redshirt all OL and DL
    2. Redshirt QBs
    3. Redshirt everyone else

    At the end of the day, best players play.

    Exactly how I feel.

    You guys are dooging so hard for Browning it's unsettling.
    Because of the potential shitshow passing offense we might see this year if it's not him.
    hm. no comment here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter