Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Will Washington be extra motivated to beat USC this season?
Comments
-
PostGameOrangeSlices said:Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive. -
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year. -
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive. -
You mean like the Boston College game?RoadDawg55 said:
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.
-
Fair assessment. I don't think they will end up better than last year. So that's an 8-4 type team. I would think UW will be around a TD underdog. Unless UW is an absolute dumpster fire, I don't think it'll be a plungering. Talent is a problem but coaching, especially with an extra 5 days prep, will narrow that gap.RoadDawg55 said:
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.
Last year's thursday night home game SC didn't manage to put away Cal. Cal almost made a big comeback even though SC brought out the shiny helmets and a new velvet curtain for the Coliseum tunnel. I see a similar type game happening, where SC very likely wins but UW hangs within 7-10 pts the entire game. -
-
You can save deez nuts in your mouth. Oh never mind, you're too busy tongue-punching Sark's fartbox, again.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive. -
Puppylove_SugarSteve strikes again.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive. -
Shaking head in disbelief. At least Tomas isnt trying to be funnyBallSacked said:
You can save deez nuts in your mouth. Oh never mind, you're too busy tongue-punching Sark's fartbox, again.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
